User talk:Husseini1

December 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Abdul Ali Mazari has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.mazari.blogfa.com (matching the regex rule \bblog(?:cu|fa|harbor|mybrain|post|savy|spot|townhall)?\.com\b). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 21:28, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Removal of "by the biased central government" from Hazarajat
Greetings, I've removed your edit "by the biased central government" from the article Hazarajat. The reason is that that phrase is subjective (based on opinion) rather than fact, and has no footnotes to prove that it's an accurate assessment. Before editing, make sure that the facts you're stating are ones that would be hard to dispute by either party in a disagreement, or they'll generally be removed. Likewise, if there's a given interpretation of history that you think should be added, it has to be footnoted to a reputable, academic source. Wikipedia isn't necessarily about truth, it's about verifiability, so whatever you state has to be generally proven by existing scholarship. MatthewVanitas (talk) 03:54, 26 December 2009 (UTC)