User talk:Hut 8.5/Archive 18

Note that if you want to retrospectively alter your signature, retarget a redirect or other trivial change I don't really care.  Hut 8.5  19:16, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

How do I know the material was copyrighted? (Akmaie Ajam)
Hello, I made many edits on OnePlus Nord, and you deleted it. Why? Which material is copyrighted? How do I know if the material is copyrighted? I need clarification. Please answer this. Help me. Thank you. (Also sent to Emir of Wikipedia) Akmaie Ajam (talk) 00:36, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Sorry for me moving it up, but this is important. Please clarify now. How do i choose uncopyrighted material? Thanks. Akmaie Ajam (talk) 00:47, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
 * I'm in Indonesia. It's 8:40 (UTC+7) right here in Semarang, Indonesia. If you see my section, please reply as fast as possible. Any help is appreciated. Thank you. Akmaie Ajam (talk) 01:41, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

Pyrrho (RDBMS) and bikes
Regarding: Pyrrho (RDBMS). While at DRV it is arguably not necessary to restore the talk page with an unspeedy it is, both because it can contain notability information/references and because it probably triggers notification to relevant wikiprojects. I do not believe Talk:Pyrrho (RDBMS) has been restored. Pyrrho is likely most skeptical about this. I am somewhat hopeful you will be more happy to do this than you were with the refund of Guardian Bikes ... you might care to read this ... User_talk:Scruitineer. ( I also have a couple of essentially technology bike articles based in draft ... they may or may not go forward if I take the urge ) As to my position on bikes you may read this ... User talk:Djm-leighpark/Archives/2018 1. Please be aware I have a wry and dry sense of humour and at least someone has taken that DRV and unspeedied it and AfD was inevitable. Please keep up your good work .... you get through a lot (though please refund my stuff in future!) ... thanks in good faith.Djm-leighpark (talk) 21:41, 3 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Alright, there's no need to offer a long argument about the talk page, it just didn't occur to me that there was a talk page which should be restored and hadn't been restored already. I've restored it now.  Hut 8.5  06:48, 4 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Ta Djm-leighpark (talk) 07:10, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

FIFA copyright issue
Hello. :) I just wanted to drop you a note to say that I wasn't sure if you intended to close out the FIFA listing at Copyright problems/2018 June 24, so I have gone ahead and done so. Apologies if that was redundant to your intentions! As it happens, we agree on the conclusion, so that works out handily. I did drop a honking big wall of text about copyright law and precedence and our own policies, as I saw a lot of alarming misunderstandings in the talk page especially about the way things work. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:56, 14 July 2018 (UTC)


 * no problem, I wasn't sure whether to close it or leave it open for further comments, and you've answered it more comprehensively and authoritatively than I could have!  Hut 8.5  17:26, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

Job Order Contracting Page Deletion
Hello Hut 8.5: I'm inquiring on your deletion of the following page:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Job_order_contracting

What can we do to get you to restore it, so we can amend to meet your guidelines? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gssmith1986 (talk • contribs) 12:26, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

edited 13:23, 21 July 2018 (UTC) Thank you Hut 8.5 for replying to my query on this deletion. I hope I am responding in the appropriate place here. "We" in my inquiry above, are the Center for JOC Excellence, which is a US based non-profit Industry association comprised of Public Agencies (Federal, State, and Local Governments) and Contractors utilizing the Job Order Contracting technique. I'm providing a link to CJE Association here:

https://jocexcellence.org/

I am a former National Board member of this association, and currently on the education committee for it. I did not create the original article nor have I previously contributed to it; I concur with your assessment that the page had evolved into an advertising medium, which we attribute to certain JOC practitioner promoting its own version of JOC. I'm not certain who declared CJE ownership of the article either, but I understand that no one "owns" any articles. Perhaps we should have had a custodian responsible for monitoring the article evolution, but we did not. To that end, we'd like to recreate it in compliance with Wikipedia guidelines, however I don't have a copy of the original...is there somewhere we could recover that, amend it in compliance, and then republish? Also, thank you for your earlier prompt reply and help in this matter.Gssmith1986 (talk) 13:23, 21 July 2018 (UTC)gssmith1986

Happy first edit day
 Happy First Edit Day! Have a very happy first edit anniversary! From the Birthday Committee, &#8208;&#8208;1997kB (talk) 13:40, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

User talk:GAYBJ
I think needs a talk page adjustment. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 06:41, 24 July 2018 (UTC)


 * sorry, I went offline after the block, I see someone else has already taken care of it.  Hut 8.5  17:18, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
 * GAYBJ fortunately quit, so it wasn't filling up my Huggle cue as often happens. Thanks for all of your hard work! Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 19:27, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Gabriella Crespi's page
Hi, sorry for bothering but I wanted to ask some help with Crespi's page. I am a fan of her work and I re-edited the page many times to solve the issues pointed out, but I am not understanding what I am doing wrong. Could I ask you a piece of advice? Thank you very much. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lorenzo Mattiello (talk • contribs) 13:03, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Hi
I was going to move back to my userpage and hold onto to it there but I guess it's too late for that. Freefalling660 (talk) 22:43, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes please restore it back to my userspace. Freefalling660 (talk) 12:57, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

Josve05a incorrectly marked content on my page for deletion
Josve05a has marked a load of labourously created press citations as copyright violation, when that is not correct. I have brought this to his attention, and he has asked me to request the undeletion of this mistakenly tagged content here. The page in question is for the game Insane Robots. Thank you.

Page recreation
Hi Hut 8.5. You recently deleted Wikipedia talk:UPIMAGE, which I had nominated as WP:G2. Do you find it strange that it was the second time that it had been created? I had nominated it back in May, for the same reason, and deleted it. It was created the first time by and the second time by.

It's a pretty obscure page title, especially given it's a talk page. Do you think it's the same person? Is it even worth the effort to see if it's a sock? --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 21:52, 7 August 2018 (UTC)


 * I suppose they could be socks but I doubt it and it doesn't make much difference. Googling the word "Hoxaifa" returns names of people living in India or Pakistan, so I suspect that user is from somewhere around there. The other user claimed in an edit summary to be a Nollywood film producer and director. Even if that's not true I suspect they're from Africa. The contents of the pages doesn't show any similarity. Neither user has made any other edits other than creating their user pages so it doesn't make much difference if they are socks and we don't have anything else to go on anyway.  Hut 8.5  06:47, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

Why was my page deleted?
You have deleted my page on Language MOOCs:

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Language_MOOC_(L-MOOC)&action=edit&redlink=1

Apparently due to:

22:26, 8 November 2016 Hut 8.5 (talk | contribs) deleted page Draft:Language MOOC (L-MOOC) (G7: One author who has requested deletion or blanked the page)

Who asked for it to be deleted? Can I have it back please?

I appreciate that it needs to be finished but will do so.

Thanks.

p.s. I was not logged on when I wrote this message. I am now. Timothy.M.Read (talk) 06:34, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

You calling my work "Drivel" and deleting a biography Draft Page
You deleted a Draft page written by a 3rd party (not by me) entitled "Draft:Richard_P._Crandall".

You said it violated copyright restrictions and you called my physics research "Drivel".

I am Richard P. Crandall (physicist), the person whom the Draft article was about. The author of that was simply referencing my autobiography which is on my website. I have written 2 published books, and have appeared on at least one television show, which aired in the state of Connecticut. I am ALLOWING that third party person to use my content Without Restriction. He has my permission to publish such article about me. Also my physics is not "Drivel". That is unfair and pre-judgmental BIAS. And it's not nice to say that to a person whom doctors have given only 1 more month to live!!!

I ask that you un-delete the article, and THEN let OTHER editors handle it!

And, I demand an apology.

Richard P. Crandall Xxrickc (talk) 04:27, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

Have a wonderful time!!!
 Hello Hut 8.5, Qwerty number1 has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Qwerty number1 (talk) 19:47, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Question
Hi, I just came across the page Dynamic Armor (now) and noticed it had been moved by you (a few years ago) from "Dynamic Armour". I was just curious why, as it appears there was nothing wrong with the original British English spelling, (the article states it's a development of the UK, a majority of the sources use the Br.Eng spelling and the page creator,, identifies as both British and a user of Br.Eng), so why move it to the American spelling? Thanks - wolf  13:20, 21 September 2018 (UTC)


 * the move I did in 2015 was to fix a cut-and-paste move done by someone else. At the time I worked on reviewing listings created by a bot of potential cut-and-paste moves. The original move was done by DeeJaye6. At the time the article didn't mention the UK at all but did note that the system was being considered for inclusion on a US Navy aircraft carrier. I suspect I didn't do any particular research into it at the time other than to note that the reason for the move wasn't ridiculous. The current article makes it much more clear that it's a British system and I have no problem with it being moved back to the British spelling.  Hut 8.5  18:04, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
 * I see. Like I said, just curiosity (not criticism). Thanks for the reply. - wolf  18:13, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

RfC withdrawn and restated
You had !voted at an RfC. I withdrew and restated it. See RfC on the intersection of WP:BLPSPS and WP:PSCI restated Jytdog (talk) 15:39, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

Draft:openHAB
Hi, sorry, my mailbox was full at the time you sent the e-mail regarding Draft:openHAB. Could you send it again, please? Thank you, and sorry for the inconvienience! Eff0ktiv (talk) 19:01, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

User talk:RaeSremmurdTentacion
You may wish to consider removing talk page access here thanks. -- Longhair\talk 04:05, 5 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Thanks, I think you can do that sort of thing yourself though.  Hut 8.5  07:52, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

Ethics of Animal Research
Hello there! I apologise for my untimely reply. I have been overloaded with work but I have some time to fight for this as I believe the subject is valuable to the wider community! I am going to type something on the page you linked me. I am very grateful you sent it to me and offered support thank you --ExistentialMariachi (talk) (UTC)

Draft of Georgia Tech School of Electrical and Computer Engineering
Hello -- I rewrote the content on this page and I'm wondering what needs to be done now in order to get it out of draft and published? Please let me know if there is anything I need to do. Thanks!

Ashbo00 (talk) 14:23, 12 November 2018 (UTC)Ashbo00

So from what I can tell, I will not be allowed to create a page for Georgia Tech's School of Electrical and Computer Engineering because I work at Georgia Tech? How can I go about requesting that a page be created for the School? Many other electrical and computer engineering departments and schools have wikipedia pages. Please advise. Thanks in advance for your help. Ashbo00 (talk) 22:51, 29 November 2018 (UTC)Ashbo00

Recreation of Dolphins and You
Hi Hut 8.5. You deleted the Dolphins and You article due to copyright infringement. Is it possible to recreate that article (even as a draft) so I can have the opportunity to correct the issues? Thank you and I appreciate your assistance. RickLOD (talk) 22:32, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Hunter Schafer
This edit right here shows you that this user created this article as a test from “brainstorming”. And clearly this article isn’t written how a Wikipedia page is supposed to be written.Trillfendi (talk) 22:06, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

Dennis Jeter Page Deleted.
I am Dennis Jeter. I created a page with my bio and you deleted it. Why? Do I need to put a link to my website as a source for the biography? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Djeter3 (talk • contribs) 22:17, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

New page
Hi,

I am new to the website and a public figure bikini model.

I was wondering if you could tell me how I could go about having a page made?

You can email me back on Eileen.odonnell@live.ie or via messages on Instagram @eileenodonnell_

Keep up the good work!

Thanks, Eileen — Preceding unsigned comment added by Odonnell 18 (talk • contribs) 16:49, 13 December 2018 (UTC)

Socking
Hi, Hut - I'm not sure if you're aware of the history behind the BLP you restored and moved to Draft:Naman_Ambavi. There is an open SPI case Sockpuppet_investigations/Brianna_Wiest. The article has been reviewed by at AfC and NPP, and the attempts to get their BLP published (there is reason to believe the editor has a COI) date back to 2013. The BLP fails GNG and is quite insistent on getting published, regardless of the failed reviews, thus the sock activity and concern over the COI. Atsme ✍🏻📧 02:05, 18 December 2018 (UTC)


 * the page was only deleted in the first place because the author asked for it. Given that the creator requested restoration minutes afterwards I suspect that they didn't really mean to do this and were instead asking for something else, such as moving it back to draft space. I moved it back to draft space as an alternative to relisting the AfD which was going on at the time of deletion. If the author moves it back into mainspace without massively improving it I'd be happy to delete it if possible or prevent the user from moving it again. I'm not sure the alleged socking is a big concern here as it appears to be a new editor editing while logged out.  Hut 8.5  08:09, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Perhaps you overlooked this AfD? I'm not sure what you're referring to about author's request to delete. may be able to explain this situation better than I. Atsme ✍🏻📧 13:38, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
 * No, I'm not overlooking the AfD, as you can see from the fact that I've mentioned it above. The AfD was not closed as Delete, it was closed as Speedy Delete because the author requested deletion. As I said, the article was deleted because the author requested it and not because of the result of the AfD. I could have reopened the debate after the creator requested restoration but I opted to move it back to draft space instead.  Hut 8.5  18:19, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
 * The non-admin closure further complicated things because there was a draft in existence, AND an article in mainspace, which may explain this edit and the parallel histories mentioned by . The author was asking that the Draft be deleted and history merged, and he tagged it incorrectly as you can see by the red text. You see, when his AfC was declined, he ignored the decline and moved the article himself leaving the draft behind:
 * 07:05, December 15, 2018 Brianna Wiest (talk | contribs) deleted redirect Naman Ambavi by overwriting (G6: Deleted to make way for move) (thank)
 * 07:03, December 15, 2018 Brianna Wiest (talk | contribs) moved page Naman Ambavi to User:Naman Ambavi (revert) (thank)
 * 12:52, August 22, 2013 Peridon (talk | contribs) deleted page Naman Ambavi (A7: Article about a real person, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject) (thank)
 * Look at User talk:Brianna Wiest and you will see that on Dec 14th I tagged the article A7, and the tag was deleted by his IP sock here. Removal of that tag was his 1st policy vio as author of the article, if like you say, he edited without logging in or if he was socking which equates into 2 policy vios. I don't have access to the actual article history to know which was the article and which was the draft because it all shows up as if was always in draft. What I do know is that we have an open SPI, and a mistaken G7 that should have been an A7 for the article (that also included deleting the draft), and that 5 years ago the same article was an A7: Article about a real person, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject (deleted by Peridon). Nothing has changed to make it pass GNG.
 * After I tagged the article A7 my tag was quickly removed by the IP (sock) - 1st policy vio. Another editor restored the CSD tag and it was removed again - 2nd policy vio. Then the IP (sock) prepared to move the draft into mainspace (read the edit summaries), and added the hist merge tag. You don't go through all that effort when you want to delete your article. He was wanting to delete the draft and merge the history into the article. Somehow, among all the disruption caused by the author, the efforts of the NPP reviewers became lost in the confusion and the G7 request for the existing draft/merge history is what floated to the top in lieu of the A7. The author's improper tagging, IP disruption and tag removals, his attempt to move the draft into mainspace himself which created this mess, and well, his non-notable article lives on in draft space. For our efforts, we're left to deal with a SPA, potential SPI and COI editor all rolled into one with their same non-notable promo BLP in Draft space they are bound and determined to get back into mainspace. I am forced to leave it at that considering the sequence of events are much too complex for me to explain. Sorry for any inconvenience I may have caused you. Atsme ✍🏻📧 20:40, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Sorry, what exactly are you asking me to do here? I can't immediately see anything which would justify deleting the draft again, or blocking the creator.  Hut 8.5  21:35, 18 December 2018 (UTC)


 * See User talk:Anthony Appleyard. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 23:32, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi Hut - now that we have taken the proper steps to AGF, can you please help expedite this case? After you moved the article back to Draft, the author added more promotional material cited to sources he authored. It's a rather obvious case of promotion-sock activity-COI involving a non-notable person. Can you please speedy delete the Draft and do whatever is necessary to prevent this user from wasting any more of the community's time? I've asked  to look into the open SPI case.  The MfD is here. I have always been willing to mentor and help problematic editors who are here to build the encyclopedia, but this SPA has a different plan for the pedia. Thanks in advance...Atsme ✍🏻📧 13:52, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
 * I suggest we just wait for the result of the MfD. Most of your complaints against this editor aren't valid reasons to speedily delete a draft. I think it is definitely getting close to being a G11 candidate but I'd rather let the MfD sort it out.  Hut 8.5  16:21, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Hut 8.5!


Happy New Year! Hut 8.5, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Donner60 (talk) 07:22, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

E G Brisch - declined page
hi there - many thanks for taking a look at my draft page for E G Brisch recently. I just wanted to say that I am his son and wrote the text.I thought his details would be of interest as his classification scheme was widely used and forms the bases of many such systems today. I made a wordpress site for him and thought it would be ok to use my own text for Wiki ? I will be happy to reword it if you insist.

Many thanks - Gerry Brisch Riga-to-Rangoon (talk) 12:09, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

DRV discussion
Hi, Just noting that I saw you comments and now better understand your point. I still don't think there is a huge line between this and folklore (where WP:FRINGE wouldn't apply), but I do get where you are going. I'd have responded in the discussion but it's a bit of a cluster, so... Good luck! Hobit (talk) 21:24, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

Deletion of Boundless (production company)
Regarding: Deletion of Boundless (production company) I would argue that since it's a functioning entertainment company, responsible for making many of the most popular programmes on British Television it should never have been deleted, but rather expanded. However rather than expand the page, edits have been reducing the size (not helpful in my view). I had not got round to cleaning up the page or explaining it. If it's reinstated, I can expand the page and clean up any outstanding issues.  The Emperor of Byzantium  (talk) 00:30, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

103.52.140.65
was blocked by you in June, went back to vandalizing.

<-- pinging admin who applied the previous block.

Also see his global contributions. --Guy Macon (talk) 20:24, 21 January 2019 (UTC)


 * thanks, as it's obviously the same person I've blocked for 3 months.  Hut 8.5  20:40, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Cockloverfag
Who could have guessed an account with a name like that was vandalism-only? I'm shocked! Shocked, I tell you! HalfShadow 00:34, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Einar_Torfi_Einarsson
Dear Hut 8.5,

I'm wondering about the deletion of my draft. The text there is one I wrote with the composer a while ago. It has been used by others, including the website you cite. Now, what can I do about this? Also, eventually, to a big extent it's biographical data, which will be similar on different platforms? Looking forward to hearing your reaction.

Best wishes, Robert — Preceding unsigned comment added by Albersen12 (talk • contribs) 09:33, 15 February 2019 (UTC) Albersen12 (talk) 09:43, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

MeWe social media site
I'd like to unprotect the page MeWe, if possible. I've worked up a draft article which should pass notability, citation, and other standards. I'm open to naming the page "MeWE (social media site)" or some variation, as there is already a "Mewe" redirect page in use. It's gonna be confusing, since "mewe" is a name and has meaning in other languages, it appears. - Tim1965 (talk) 02:31, 27 February 2019 (UTC)


 * OK, I've unprotected it, you can either create it as a redirect or move your draft there.  Hut 8.5  22:11, 27 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Thank you! - Tim1965 (talk) 00:31, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Chris Collins(Politician) listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Chris Collins(Politician). Since you had some involvement with the Chris Collins(Politician) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 22:24, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

Deletion
Hi Hut 8.5,

I created my first page, but it was deleted because of one piece of content that was deemed copyright. Can I please have a copy of the content, I edited it directly on Wikipedia, so do not have a backup. I will ensure that all content will be rewritten as to not invoke any copyright.

Starthought (talk) 16:14, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

--- Updated email on file. The copyright content was only one paragraph. I am rewriting it now, but wanted the original to ensure I didn't miss any important information. In the meantime I recreated the page. Please let me know if you have any further concerns about the content. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Starthought (talk • contribs) 17:42, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

Help
Hello Mr Hut, I saw you reverted one deletion of Sanjay Razdan. I think the nominator felt shamed and came again and this time involved some people. But I am unable to understand that those guys are evaluating the page on WP:GNG whereas WP:GNG clearly indicates that if the subject received significant coverage and even WP:Prof verifies the notability. I am really unable to understand the agenda. Should I focus on written policies or personal opinions of the nominators? Because articles with almost no references are on Wikipedia because when we google we knows the notability. Anyway, I am really confused because I want to create more pages. Please suggest a better place to learn how to create a page to satisfy the users opinions. MaxiColeman40 (talk) 16:11, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

Unprotect
Hey H, I saw many years ago you move-protected Portal:Organized Labour; I think it makes sense to move it to Portal:Organized labour, as (probably becasue of the protection) it was the only portal that was not moved to follow article capitalization back in 2010 when the rest of the portals were retitled. Could you please unprotect it so I can do the move? Thanks! UnitedStatesian (talk) 22:18, 6 May 2019 (UTC)


 * sure, done.  Hut 8.5  06:38, 7 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Thanks. Could you also remove your move protections of Portal:Aviation and Portal:Catholicism?  Think it makes sense to have them located instead at Portal:Aircraft and Portal:Catholic Church respectively, to match the titles of the article.  UnitedStatesian (talk) 00:05, 13 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Sure, unprotected those as well.  Hut 8.5  20:47, 13 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Last one (I think): can you unprotect Portal:Military of Australia? It should be at Portal:Australian Defence Force so the title matches the article on the subject.  Thanks! UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:25, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry for butting in here User:Hut 8.5, but I'm letting User:UnitedStatesian know I would oppose such a move. The portal is not merely about the current military but about military history of Australia as well. Please request such a move so that we can discuss it. BusterD (talk) 21:45, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Done that one as well. I'm honestly not sure why I protected these now.  Hut 8.5  20:46, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

I want to make revisions
Hi Hut! I'm going to revise the page you deleted to make it more compliant. Is there a way to get the draft back so I can revise? Thanks!

Lisaziviello (talk) 15:02, 14 May 2019 (UTC) Lisaziviello

Kim Sun-hui
Hi Hut 8.5. Please could you restore Kim Sun-hui to my userspace? Subject is a notable international soccer player who was the captain of the North Korea team at the 1999 FIFA Women's World Cup. I'd like to see if I can improve the article before putting it back to the 'mainspace'. Many thanks, Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 09:57, 18 May 2019 (UTC)


 * in that case you'll need to start again, Kim Sun-hui was a redirect to Kim Soon-hee, who's a weightlifter. The deleted page was never an article.  Hut 8.5  14:07, 19 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Okay, will do, thanks for taking a look. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 14:09, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

Ankole-cattle
Hi! We edit-conflicted there – unfortunately there's still more, so I've blanked it. Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 15:31, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

Welcome to the Neighbourhood (Boston Manor album)
Hi Hut 8.5, regarding this article, I did perform a Carbon dating on the source, which appears to have been created back on June 11, 2018, which is prior to the creation of this article. Am I missing something? Thanks.  Onel 5969  TT me 20:57, 19 May 2019 (UTC)


 * that site appears to be copying its descriptions from Wikipedia, e.g. this cached version credits "Description provided by Wikipedia under Creative Commons Attribution CC-BY-SA 4.0". The page might have been created in 2018 but that doesn't mean the text has been at the URL for that long. Note that currently the URL doesn't have that text at all.  Hut 8.5  21:29, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the explanation, hadn't realized that. Sorry to take up your time. Onel 5969  TT me 21:32, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

Scots language.
The text you removed is on the public domain (as it was written sometime in 1800) and the English translation was not copyrighted. Wouldn't that mean, that there is no copyright violation?

Lou Marinoff's wiki page
I do not find particularly helpful your deletion of my material, nor your snarky comment that Wiki is "not my CVC host". --> FYI, my CV contains three times as much as I posted. If you don't like my listing of books, book chapters, and articles then just say so. --> You have also deleted descriptive biographical facts about my work which have NOTHING TO DO with my CV. --> You have reverted to an ugly, incomplete, and fatuously misrepresentative page that does a profound disservice to my profile and your credibility. I would appreciate some clear guidelines about what will pass muster on my Wiki page. Loumarinoff (talk) 22:29, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Requests for Undeletion? EnPowered
Hi there, I was curious if you could help me determine the status of my request for undeletion (EnPowered - https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion&diff=897565387&oldid=897565252#EnPowered ). I'm asking since you would be familiar with it, as you commented on it. I assume it timed out after 7 days without a response. Are you able to confirm that was the case, and if so what next steps are? Thank you in advance, JScott-NL (talk) 14:22, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

Request for Undeletion
seems to be requesting the undeletion of Felix Römer (disambiguation) to User:Edwin of Northumbria/sandbox, from which they seem to have accidentally moved it. See their comments at User talk:DannyS712 and User talk:Edwin of Northumbria. Based off of the deletion reason, I don't think that this should cause any problem. Thanks, StudiesWorld (talk) 18:27, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

Raquel Rabinovich
Hello and thanks for your edits. I reverted an addition by User Geofq of copyvio material to the above page; I see you also reverted Geofq's addition of the same material about a week ago. Does this kind of thing need Revdel? Just curious. Thank you. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 03:11, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
 * You can certainly request revdel for pieces of copyvio which were quickly removed, yes. It isn't required, the main thing is that the copyvio is removed from the article. I'm not sure offhand why I didn't revdel that edit.  Hut 8.5  21:15, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Lindbergh Lavista Corridor Coalition
Why did you delete this page Lindbergh Lavista Corridor Coalition? Material was not copyrighted. Facts are just facts regardless of sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LLCorridor (talk • contribs) 21:26, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Your decline of CSD for The Castle Convent School
Hi. With this edit you chose to "decline, A7 doesn't apply to schools and there's enough context to identify the subject". As you'll know, A7 "applies to any article about a real person, individual animal, commercial or non-commercial organization, web content, or organized event that does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, with the exception of educational institutions." Notability (organizations and companies)'s WP:NSCHOOL says "For-profit educational organizations and institutions are considered commercial organizations and must satisfy those criteria." The Castle Convent School article says it "is a professionally managed co educational institution" (my emphasis). This page on its web site discusses fees, which to me indicates it is a for-profit school. What do you think? It's still an article with just the one line of prose and 2 sources, neither of which describe why the subject is important. Thanks. -Lopifalko (talk) 20:30, 11 June 2019 (UTC)


 * if it's a for-profit private school then A7 still doesn't apply, as a private school is still a school. A7 does apply to companies which provide educational services, as long as those services aren't done through a school, college, university etc, but this one does claim to be an educational institution so I think we'll have to act as if the exception for educational institutions applies. WP:CSD does say "Administrators should take care not to speedy delete pages or media except in the most obvious cases". I'm happy for you to nominate the article for deletion through WP:PROD or WP:AFD, it certainly isn't much of an article and the subject may well be non-notable. Articles on non-notable schools are often dealt with by redirecting the title to an article on education in wherever the school is.  Hut 8.5  20:56, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for the RevDel
Hi Hut 8.5, thank you for deleting the copyvio revisions on Sean McGuire. When created, the article was a copyvio so that's why I tagged it with G12. I wasn't sure if any material would remain, so thank you for sorting through it and rescuing the information that was acceptable. Hope you're well, Jip Orlando (talk) 22:48, 13 June 2019 (UTC)