User talk:Hvalfisken

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:ReCell-kit-2.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:ReCell-kit-2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 22:08, 11 February 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 22:08, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:ReCell-Spray-2.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:ReCell-Spray-2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 22:09, 11 February 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 22:09, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Copyright violations
The article Recell has been deleted for mass copyright violations. All the information you had on the page where lifted from various websites that are clearly marked as copyright, and not released on those pages under the appropriate licenses. Therefore their inclusion on Wikipedia is not allowed, as has been pointed out before. Canterbury Tail  talk  12:51, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

ANI Conversation
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Canterbury Tail  talk  16:48, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of ReCell Autologous Spray-On Skin
A tag has been placed on ReCell Autologous Spray-On Skin, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ukexpat (talk) 17:28, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Girl_facial_hyperpigmentation_6_mo_post-ReCell.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Girl_facial_hyperpigmentation_6_mo_post-ReCell.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? feydey (talk) 17:44, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

File:Diagram_migrating_keratinocytes.jpg
I have tagged File:Diagram_migrating_keratinocytes.jpg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Use rationale examples. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. feydey (talk) 17:45, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

deletion of post
I believe this article warrants inclusion as it does to things: 1. is probably the most comprehensive discussion of burns treatment on wikipedia (note links to other wiki pages) which is very valuable and provides numerous cited references. 2. provides information about a technology that is being widely used and of considerable interest to burn victims. I agree that sites such as [Honda Integra], [Dell] or [LifeCell] are company promoting ... but they're still up.


 * Please read WP:SPAM - your article was littered with all the hallmarks of an advertisement masquerading as an article. – ukexpat (talk) 18:05, 12 February 2010 (UTC)


 * not sure how to respond. there is no question but that spray on skin is an important technology to burn victims. there is only 1 product that has made this a workable technology. I'd be delighted to delete any reference to the company Avita - in fact i put in those references in response to another reviewer's comments about source. If you feel that this is too much of an 'infomercial' how can it be corrected? and as per my last response, go to [Honda Integra] - is this not a blatant advert for a product in the guise of a 'car fanciers' or 'history of a particular make of automobile' article?
 * Please let me know how this info could be presented in a less 'commercial' bent. thank you. I appreciate your concern and assistance. Hvalfisken (talk) 18:28, 12 February 2010 (UTC)


 * If you are intent on re-creating the article, I suggest that you do so first in a user subpage, like the existing User:Hvalfisken/ReCell Autologous Spray-On Skin (delete the redirect code first though), and then ask at WP:FEED for it to be reviewed. One example of the "hallmarks" I was referring to is the proliferation of the circle-R symbol - that is usually a sign that the text is at least based on materials from the manufacturer, even if not a copyvio thereof (and see also WP:MOSTM). When it comes to sources, please note that references to the company's website are not sufficient to demonstrate the notability required by WP:PRODUCT. You need reliable sources of the kind described in WP:RS and WP:IRS. Your access to images from the company may suggest that you have some connection to the company. If so, please read WP:COI. Finally, for now at least, "other stuff exists" is not a helpful argument in these discussions, we are talking about this article. Hope this helps. – ukexpat (talk) 19:15, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

OK, thanks. I'll modify and ask for review prior to posting. this is my 1st article, maybe didn't know the protocol.

Replaceable fair use File:Hypertrophic_dyspigmented_neck_pre.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Hypertrophic_dyspigmented_neck_pre.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 10:35, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Girl_facial_hyperpigmentation_ReCell_treated_area.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Girl_facial_hyperpigmentation_ReCell_treated_area.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 10:46, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

File:Girl_facial_hyperpigmentation_pre-ReCell.jpg
I have tagged File:Girl_facial_hyperpigmentation_pre-ReCell.jpg as orphaned fairuse. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. Otherwise, it will be deleted in seven days. Melesse (talk) 10:46, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

File:Hypertrophic_dyspigmented_neck_post.jpg
I have tagged File:Hypertrophic_dyspigmented_neck_post.jpg as orphaned fairuse. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. Otherwise, it will be deleted in seven days. Melesse (talk) 10:48, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

File:Hypertrophic_scar_left_breast_pre.jpg
I have tagged File:Hypertrophic_scar_left_breast_pre.jpg as orphaned fairuse. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. Otherwise, it will be deleted in seven days. Melesse (talk) 10:49, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

File:Leucoderma_on_calf_pre_ReCell.jpg
I have tagged File:Leucoderma_on_calf_pre_ReCell.jpg as orphaned fairuse. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. Otherwise, it will be deleted in seven days. Melesse (talk) 10:50, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

File:ReCell-child_chest_scald.jpg
I have tagged File:ReCell-child_chest_scald.jpg as orphaned fairuse. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. Otherwise, it will be deleted in seven days. Melesse (talk) 10:56, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

File:Recell_white_background.jpg
I have tagged File:Recell_white_background.jpg as orphaned fairuse. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. Otherwise, it will be deleted in seven days. Melesse (talk) 10:56, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

File:Soldier_face_burn_pre.jpg
I have tagged File:Soldier_face_burn_pre.jpg as orphaned fairuse. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. Otherwise, it will be deleted in seven days. Melesse (talk) 11:01, 14 February 2010 (UTC)