User talk:Hvvisweswaran

October 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Indian philosophy has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Indian philosophy was changed by Hvvisweswaran (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.951246 on 2014-10-14T05:37:45+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:37, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Indian philosophy. Your edits have been reverted or removed. Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Four times, four times removed; next is the notice-board for edit-warring.  Joshua Jonathan   -  Let's talk!   14:33, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.


 * Hi Hvvisweswaran. Your point is valuable, but adding info "sourced" with your own blog is not accepted. Read WP:RS, and try to find some reliable sources. Bets regards,  Joshua Jonathan   -  Let's talk!   14:36, 14 October 2014 (UTC)


 * my edit was removed. I never intended to disrupt. I am an academic.

the topic of indian philosophy does not include south indian thinking. it is unfair and to be rectified. individuals like me have only wiki to express our views. please read my last edit to see how it is offensive or out of context. This is the first attempt to include thirukkural into the indian philosophy circle. so please think out of the box and decide. at last the editor of wiki is supreme. irespect it.
 * hvvisweswaran 16:54, 14 October 2014


 * thank u for accepting my point. For effective and relevent reference, unfortunately there are none. my reference is a pioneer. I was invited to present the views of the paper in society for asian comparative philosophy, SACP, held at binghamton ny. unfortuntely I missed the opportunity due to ill health. I am 72 yers of age.now how can I put forth my point. you can assess my paper in the blog and decide. it may take time. I feel it worths. let wiki move beyond the existing and explore and add new views. again I tell you, I respect the editor's decision. 17:07, 14 October 2014 Hvvisweswaran


 * I'm going to have a look. When you post a message, you can sign with ~ . It will automatically change into your username, plus the date. Best regards,  Joshua Jonathan   -  Let's talk!   18:54, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Thirukkural
Hi Hvvisweswaran. You added:


 * ''"Though Indian, all of the works discussed above pertains to Aryan/Vedic thinking. The rich Dravidian civilization and their philosophy of life, as depicted in the famous and popular work of Thiruvalluvar, Thirukkural (திருக்குறள்) is not included in the study of Indian Philosophy. So far all these discussions are confined to Aryan,Vedic,Philosophy. A new discussion is initiated in Philosophy of Peninsular India - ThirukkuRaL_aRam
 * ''In that it is discusssed how the Baghavat-Gita and Thirukkural take up the same ideas ,which impact the human life, are differently discussed. The discussion is synthesis of the both works. By including Thirukkural in the discuusion, we get the topic of Indian Philosophy complete.

There are three points:
 * 1) The focus on Aryan/Vedic philosophy, and the exclusion of Dravidian (Tamil?) philosophy
 * 2) Thiruvalluvar's Thirukkural as exemplary for Dravidian philosophy
 * 3) The interplay between Aryan/Vedic philosophy and Dravidian philosophy


 * Ad1: this point has been mentioned by others, I'm quite sure. McMahan mentions the interplay between those cultures: "Empty Vision: Metaphor and Visionary Imagery in Mahayana Buddhism", p.61-62. The western understanding of India has been shaped by Brahman informants; see Hinduism.
 * Ad2: George L. Hart, "The Relation Between Tamil and Classical Sanskrit Literature", p.339.
 * Ad3: Idem; see also Sanskritization.

Your paper may be of interest to some readers, but it's not WP:RS. Maybe you can add it as an external link (bottom of most WP-pages) to Tirukkuṛaḷ.

I hope you're not dishearted by this; you did your best. All the best,  Joshua Jonathan   -  Let's talk!   19:15, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Tirukkuṛaḷ, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Tirukkuṛaḷ was changed by Hvvisweswaran (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.963439 on 2014-10-16T03:43:38+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:43, 16 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Dear mr. Hvvisweswaran, my apologies. I adviced you to add the link. I'm afraid that this is not going to work. The edits to Tirukkuṛaḷ have alos been reverted; next time someone is sure going to block you for a day, which would be a pity. You could open a discussion at the talkpage of Tirukkuṛaḷ, but most likely other editors will also say that your research is qualified here as non-noteworthy, no matter how much effort you put in it. could you be of help here? Best regards,   Joshua Jonathan   -  Let's talk!   12:29, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes, Wikipedia does not accept original research. They need to add reliable source. -- Tito ☸ Dutta 16:08, 16 October 2014 (UTC)