User talk:Hw gag 51

Welcome!
Hello, Hw gag 51, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Questions page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! VViking Talk Edits 13:11, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Regarding the Neutrality of The Article
Hey Buddy, I am thankful to you for reminding me about the neutrality of the articles. All the content written by me on Wikipedia was from a neutral point of view. I fairly, proportionately, represented the article and without editorial bias, all of the significant views was published by reliable sources, and events only. The article referred only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in on reputable websites. I used information of government websites to completely maintain the neutrality of the article. Thank You 😊! Hw gag 51 (talk) 20:13, 25 June 2019 (UTC)


 * As already mentioned, please avoid puffery and WP:PEACOCK terms like "top-ranked" in Wikipedia articles. Also, all subjective or promotional claims need an independent expert source anyway. Please try to focus on dry, directly verifiable facts instead. Thank you for your consideration. GermanJoe (talk) 11:16, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

July 2019
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Thakur College of Engineering and Technology. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Gab4gab (talk) 18:00, 1 July 2019 (UTC)