User talk:Hwilcox81

Jeph Loeb
Hi. Why did you remove the photo I took of Loeb and placed into the article? Is there some reason you did not provide a rationale for switching the photo in your Edit Summary? The photo I took was in there first, and places him in a setting and in attire that is more visibly connected with his occupation, and he became noteworthy for. Unless you have a Good Faith rationale as to why the other photo is more appropriate, please do not revert arbitrarily, and make sure you place that rationale in your Edit Summary. Thanks. Nightscream 18:12, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Question: are you with Empath Studios? Tabercil 20:45, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

I am with Empath Studios. Jeph appreciates you taking that picture, but he says you know that he wasn't happy with it. This photo is the one that NBC provides when asked. This is Jeph's preference. Please understand and do not put your photo back up again. If you wish to discuss it directly with Jeph, I can provide his email address. Thanks hwilcox81


 * Jeph indicated that he wasn't happy with the one I initially took, but after Tim took several others, as did another friend of his nearby, and after I myself took others (after taking the flash off), he indicated he was satisfied with the last one I took. In any case, preference on the part of the subject is not a criteria for images in Wikipedia articles, and since you do not appear to be an editor with any experience on WP, please do not presume to tell me not what to do when editing articles.  But if you can provide his email address so that I can verify this with Jeph himself, yes, please do so.  Thanks. Nightscream 04:50, 10 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Hold on, hold on. Clarify for me: you're with Empath Studio's correct? And you took the photo, right? Yet how is it that the photo in question "is the one that NBC provides when asked"? Did Empath Studios give the photo to NBC?? Tabercil 21:39, 11 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Um, excuse me, Hwilcox, but you were asked a question. Please answer it.  The discussion is ongoing, and it is not appropriate to delete an entire discussion from your Talk Page until it has been resolved. (See Talk page guidelines for more on this.) Nightscream 16:41, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

One of the employees at Midtown Comics contacted me to corroborate the assertion that Jeph prefers Mr. Wilcox's photo. I accept this, so now the only issue is one of copyright. If we (that is, Mr. Wilcox) can clarify who is the owner of the copyright, or whether it's in the public domain, we can resolve this. Nightscream 20:13, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

This photo is property of Empath. I work for Empath. I work for Jeph. Jeph owns Empath. Cool? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.111.181.26 (talk) 06:11, 22 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Yes, Jeph has clarified this in an email, for which I am grateful to him. Thank you. Nightscream 06:38, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Samloeb2004.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Samloeb2004.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 03:34, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Samloeb2004.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Samloeb2004.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 10:58, 1 April 2022 (UTC)