User talk:Hwoollen16/sandbox

Drcheech's peer review for Hwoollen16's edits to "Bladder outlet obstruction"
1. What does the article do well? I really like the proposed structure of the article edits. The structure makes sense and I think the list if pretty complete. 2. What changes would you suggest? While I agree with your focus on the most common pediatric causes of BOO, it may be pertinent to include additional causes that may be relevant to other populations (e.g. prostatic hyperplasia in older men, genitourinary malignancies causing obstruction, etc). 3. What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article? Anything! This is a very important topic and there is nothing currently written on it! Also, given that there is a possibility that patients' parents may use this article as a quick intro to a new diagnosis for their child, it is important to present this topic in an accurate yet accessible manner. 4. Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? I really like the way you divided up the treatment management in a chronological way (pre vs postnatal)... I will look to see if that works with my topic too. --Drcheech (talk) 21:17, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

Response to Drcheech's peer review
Thank you Drcheech for reviewing my article. As my primary focus has been on the outline of basically a brand new article, I am glad that you think the proposed structure is sound and complete. I have also gone back and added some adult specific causes of BOO to my outline, thank you for that suggestion. I agree it will make the article more complete. As you mentioned, I am also interested in having this page be a helpful quick reference for families when they are initially looking for more information on bladder outlet obstruction. I hope it will provide them some answers early on in their searches. Thanks again! Hwoollen16 (talk) 00:21, 25 October 2018 (UTC)