User talk:Hwqaksd/Archives/2020

2020 user talk archives
 * AfC-2:0

Hwqaksd, you are invited to the Teahouse!

 * cool Hwqaksd (talk) 16:34, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

October 2020
Hello, I'm Balon Greyjoy. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Daryl Maguire—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Balon Greyjoy (talk) 07:16, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Alright, apologies if I had mistakenly reverted something that appeared to be vandalism but wasn't. :D Hwqaksd (talk) 07:17, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
 * I was surprised by your response, and I realized that I was (unsuccessfully) attempting to revert the same vandalism that you were. I'm guessing that you got to it just before me and I clicked the revert button right after Huggle sent an update. My apologies for that! Balon Greyjoy (talk) 07:59, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
 * That's alright, hopefully we can both continue on our adventures of counter-vandalism. Hwqaksd (talk) 21:17, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Oh My Girl
Why did you revert my edits? EN-Jugwon (talk) 07:47, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
 * I believed it to be vandalism;after all, you blanked the ¨Awards and Nominations¨ section if I am to be correct. If it wasn´t vandalism, then you can revert the edit. Cheers. :D Hwqaksd (talk) 07:49, 14 October 2020 (UTC)


 * I actually created a new page for Oh My Girl's awards and nominations and edited their page to redirect user's to the new one. Sorry that I caused confusion. EN-Jugwon (talk) 07:53, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
 * It´s alright.Hwqaksd (talk) 07:54, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

NOS4A2
I’m not sure I understand why you reverted my edit to this article. I primarily edited information that was incorrect. So, you have reverted the information back to incorrect. 2600:387:5:814:0:0:0:45 (talk) 17:41, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Huh. Apologies for that. :D Hwqaksd (talk) 18:25, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Deer (Scotland) Act 1996 has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Deer (Scotland) Act 1996. Thanks! Dan arndt (talk) 06:52, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the aforementioned comment; as this is (hopefully) my first article, I'll try to use it when editing the draft later on. :D Hwqaksd (talk) 06:58, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Deer (Scotland) Act 1996 has been accepted
 Deer (Scotland) Act 1996, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Deer_(Scotland)_Act_1996 help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Hitro talk 11:11, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rhodosalinus sediminis has been accepted
 Rhodosalinus sediminis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Rhodosalinus_sediminis help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Hitro talk 08:24, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Welp, two drafts accepted in a row. I'm pretty proud of myself. Hwqaksd (talk) 08:25, 4 December 2020 (UTC)