User talk:Hy Brasil/Archive 1

Sitting Bull
Hello I have a bronze sculpture and I would like to know if it's Sitting Bull can you help? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cgborace (talk • contribs) 02:35, 23 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Sorry, I'm not much of an antiquarian. Good luck though. Zarcusian (talk) 02:37, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Why?
I would like to know WHY my addition to the "evolution" page was reverted! I'm REALLY SICK AND TIRED OF WORKING HARD IN HERE ONLY TO HAVE MY WORK DELETED! What was the reason for reverting my addition to the evolution page?


 * That page exclusively pertains to evolutionary biology by design. It isn't intended to be a comprehensive overview of the term evolution.  There's a disambiguation page for its various applications.  This is clearly stated at the very top of the page itself.  Best regards. Zarcusian (talk),


 * I wasn't trying to make it comprehensive. I was trying to make it accurate. Sorry... was banned, and unable to respond. DonaldKronos (talk) 21:31, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Kwanzaa
Thank you for your recent reversion of idiocy in the article on Kwanzaa. The perp is a racist, vandal, and liar; if you could help keep an eye on any contributions he may make after the vacation I've given him has ended (31 hours from now), I and (more importantly) readers would be most grateful. -- Hoary (talk) 09:50, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Hi, I noticed what he did to the Hanukkah article and followed up with his edits. Glad I was able to help. I'll certainly try to help keep an eye on them for further disruptive behavior. Best regards! Zarcusian (talk) 12:41, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Dhimmitude
Zarcusian,

I object to your revision of my contribution to dhimmitude. I was very mild, including only the fact that dhimmis live in a restricted status. I spared the readers of Wikipedia the long list of those restrictions. It is entirely false and misleading to simply say dhimmis are non-Muslim subjects living in a Muslim country. Please, allow my contribution to stand and I will spare everyone the full explanation.

Thank you, musoniki — Preceding unsigned comment added by Musoniki (talk • contribs) 00:56, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Hi, sorry for the lateness of my response. Your edits were reverted because they were clearly a violation of WP:POV, nothing more. It was simply the phrasing. I have no issue with the actual content, merely that it wasn't worded in a neutral manner.  Zarcusian (talk) 05:14, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Some reading material
Do not insult the vandals. — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 10:18, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The beer made me do it. Best regards! Zarcusian (talk) 15:29, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Crash Bandicoot
Please, I don't understand your logic. How can you possibly call a table that pretty much goes against the rules of Wikipedia and needlessly expands the page anything related to "perfectly nice"? You can't. And as Cat's Tuxedo said, it's unencyclopedic. That's perfectly concensus. 85.210.179.198 (talk) 13:06, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Meh, if two of you care, that's enough consensus for me. I do think you let yourself get needlessly worked up over it though.  Either way, best regards! Zarcusian (talk) 02:34, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Randy Moss
Zarcusian, I appreciate the reverts, but if you had warned that user I probably could have blocked them already. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 20:39, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
 * The irony is that it is very difficult for me to template anyone using my crappy old iPhone (takes a long time), but was in the process of doing so at the exact same time you left a message at their talk page. You beat me by about 30 seconds.


 * I'm experimenting with some sort of local stickies app on my phone for faster access when things like this happen. Best regards. Zarcusian (talk) 20:44, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
 * I suggest enabling WP:TWINKLE (you can easily do so in your preferences under 'gadgets'). That way, you can warn vandals with a single click.– Gilliam (talk) 00:19, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Rollback
I have [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=User%3AZarcusian granted] the "rollbacker" permission to your account. After a review of some of your contributions, I believe you can be trusted to use rollback for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see New admin school/Rollback and Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, contact me and I will remove it. Good luck and thanks. – Gilliam (talk) 00:18, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you kindly, I'll review the permission prior to using it to ensure I don't unintentionally abuse it. Will also look into Twinkle. Best regards! Zarcusian (talk) 00:23, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you . Zarcusion, only intentional abuse please--and my soup of the day was cold cucumber soup. Drmies (talk) 04:05, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Bella7790
Do you remember this girl Bella7790?? We adviced her but she keeps creating fake pages and editing with invented info. What should we do? Thanks. Anonpediann (talk) 16:51, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

RE: List of WWE Divas champions.
Hi, how do I report the vandaliser for constant disruption of the page?

Whoever it is, clearly has no respect for wiki, and must want themselves banned.

Is there any way I can report them for disruption?

Regards

80.192.130.85 (talk) 02:48, 15 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Don't worry, many eyes are watching the article, they'll be blocked soon. Best regards. Zarcusian (talk) 02:51, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Oh, but in the future that would be WP:AIV. Zarcusian (talk) 02:53, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Byronmarchant
I'm thinking maybe, at this point, given the most recent posts by the above editor to his user talk page, that you are right about the editor being demonstrably not here to help build an encyclopedia, and that there is a very good chance that a discussion at ANI might well reach the same conclusion. Just a guess, of course. John Carter (talk) 15:40, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Hi, thanks for the note. I think it may just be best to ignore him as I suspect he rather enjoys eliciting the reactions from us he's managed so far. Of course, if he continues the disruptive editing and/or personal attacks I can certainly post a message at AN/I.  If that sounds reasonable to you I'm just going to stop engaging him (although I think I've been respectful and patient, mostly) and see what he chooses to do. Thanks much. Zarcusian (talk) 15:47, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
 * He does seem to be going out of his way to annoy people, from what I've seen. Or, alternately, he is just too stupid to realize what a, um, member of the masses, as he more or less puts it, he is. Even if he just continues to go on at his user talk page as he has I think that might be grounds enough to go to ANI. I do get a feeling that he may be decided upon getting sanctions to in some way promote his book. I don't know if I've every heard of that before, of course, but there's a first time for everything. If he is set on that, though, it would obviously be only very limited publicity he would receive, but somehow he doesn't impress me as being the deepest thinker out there and might not realize that himself except perhaps by experience. John Carter (talk) 16:05, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I think more than anything this guy realized he wouldn't be able to properly use his book as a reference here and lashed out. None of this bodes well for the actual quality of his translation, that much is certain. I'll keep an eye on his account and the two IPs he used to edit the CMT article and ping you if I see anything that needs attention. You likely have more important things to do here but I really don't. Thanks again.Zarcusian (talk) 21:12, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

IP animation vandalism
Thanks. I wasn't sure if this too was vandalism, as I'm not familiar with Iwerks' work or the Tom and Jerry franchise. Certainly, I could no fins no reliable source to back up his claims. This is the same editor whose other IP is still blocked. There's no hope of a change of behaviour, so now that he's over 4 warnings and I've asked for this IP to be blocked, too. best, Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:48, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Hi Shawn, thanks for your attention to this matter. Unfortunately, this appears to be a rather large issue that most likely has gone on for months if not years. I suspect there have been many hundreds of undetected edits. I've previously opened a discussion at ANI with mixed results. I'm at work but will try to respond later with a little more helpful info.  In the meantime, if you'd be willing to keep some of these pages on your watchlist it would be immensely helpful.  Best regards, and congrats on hitting that 100k edit count, that's just an amazing number. Zarcusian (talk) 18:12, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks Zarcusian. Yes, I'll certainly keep a watch. The extent of this is rather staggering. If you could, please link that closed ANI, I'd like to get more up to speed. ANI is always a mixed result at best, in my experience. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:14, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Here is the archived thread. There's actually more but I won't be able to access it until later. Sorry I can't be of more help at present. Thanks again. Zarcusian (talk) 18:24, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Black Power
The "African American" was not use until 1988, no thank to Jesse Jackson. There is a misunderstanding that everyone is African American. Negroes were already here that didn't come from Africa. So to call everyone "African American" is taking away from the Negroes who is on this land before and Europeans contact. Oh you want to associate negro with slavery then wrong because not every negro was in slavery Mostly whites. The description of the first people were negro. Treaties were done with the term negro and removing negro is removing our of history. I don't see how people can run a site and not be educated with truth. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.9.157.250 (talk) 23:21, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Provide a source, or don't make similar edits in the future, thanks! Hy Brasil (talk) 23:32, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Chris Warner Page
Hi! Curious to hear more about why you undid the edits... I'm new to wikipedia editing so I would love to hear about your thought process when approaching editing articles. I definitely thought it had more extraneous info than necessary and was trying to focus on the main info, to reflect the pages of other bishops. His just felt really detailed. But, I would love to know why you switched it back! Thanks for your help! Unlikelyfire (talk) 17:04, 23 August 2023 (UTC)


 * It appears to be reliably sourced, non-contentious, material. If you’d like to remove it, you should probably start a discussion on the talk page of the article. Hy Brasil (talk) 04:26, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

Fight Club
Hi. Just wanna let you know that I'm mad at you for reverting my edits on Fight Club, just why?. You think mixed reception has to do with box-office faliure, it doesn't. Also, can't you see I was just putting actual critics, since your saying we're considering actual critics rather review cites. Just stop. Your making a big mistake whenever I edit something. SuperSuperSonic207 (talk) 15:02, 26 August 2023 (UTC)


 * If you want to make that change, discuss it on the talk page. Your phrasing is clunky and is not an improvement. It seems like you are having trouble comprehending the text in the article. See WP:CIR. Hy Brasil (talk) 15:06, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
 * It's supposed to be an improvement. Mixed reception doesn't effect the box office faliure and i'm also trying put "actual" in order to avoid critic sites. JUST STOP ALL OF THIS OKAY, AND LEAVE MY EDITS ALONE. SuperSuperSonic207 (talk) 16:15, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
 * I know you are new here, but I’d stop the yelling/caps right now or you likely won’t last long. Article talk pages are used to discuss changes. Stay off of my talk page unless you plan to remain civil. If you have changes to discuss pertaining to the film, go to that article’s talk page. Hy Brasil (talk) 17:07, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

Trying a add a source for Entertainment Tonight about a Kim Possible reboot
Hy Basil, I'm trying to add links to Entertainment Tonight about a Kim Possible reboot. Please I need help SuperSuperSonic207 (talk) 18:18, 26 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Head over to the WP:TEAHOUSE for now. There is a large group of editors who work to help out newer folks. Explain the edit you’d like to make and they can help you. You can ask your questions and they will help! Hy Brasil (talk) 18:25, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

October 2023
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Dhevvadhoo dynasty, from its old location at User:Hy Brasil/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. - Rich T&#124;C&#124;E-Mail 20:35, 2 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your help, I was a bit lost regarding that step. Didn’t seem right to submit it as my own mailbox but I couldn’t figure out how to change the location. I’ll have to review the steps next time prior to submitting a draft. Hy Brasil (talk) 20:39, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Boreas
Hello mr Brasil. Boreas Is also the god of Ice and snow since he is the god of winter he is also associated with everything that inlcudes winter plus joy and entertaiment. Also the Athenians viewed him as a tutelary deity because he was said to keeping away enemies like when he sank 400 Persian ships with his winter storms. Please im telling you the truth I have found this through a reliable source. 2A02:587:1F04:1700:95F9:650F:B63E:128D (talk) 13:26, 6 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Go to the article’s talk page, provide the source, and discuss the edits you want to make there. Hy Brasil (talk) 14:48, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Nevermind, I see that you are evading a block. Don’t post here again. Hy Brasil (talk) 14:52, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

FYI: wp:EWN
See wp:EWN Note: link functional until "(Result: )" filled in. Cheers Adakiko (talk) 08:14, 8 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Thank you for everything you do around here. Hy Brasil (talk) 13:33, 8 October 2023 (UTC)


 * BTW: did you have any thing to add to the EWN ticket? Cheers Adakiko (talk) 18:28, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
 * No, I think you mentioned everything relevant to the situation. Hopefully the matter will resolve itself. Thanks again.Hy Brasil (talk) 22:04, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

Japanese Gods
￼Hello mr Brasil how can I edit something wihtout it get it later reversed??? I have found reliable sources. 2A02:586:1E33:AA51:CD90:EC99:87E2:9F53 (talk) 12:37, 16 October 2023 (UTC)


 * You have been blocked for disruptive editing. You can go to your main account and submit a block appeal. Otherwise you are not allowed to edit Wikipedia. Hy Brasil (talk) 13:05, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dhevvadhoo dynasty has been accepted
 Dhevvadhoo dynasty, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Dhevvadhoo_dynasty help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Drewmutt ( ^ᴥ^ ) talk  22:04, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Dhevvadhoo dynasty
Hello Hy Brasil, I thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Dhevvadhoo dynasty, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Dhevvadhoo dynasty.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Chris Troutman ( talk ) 00:20, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about The Haunting of Harrington House
Hello Hy Brasil, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, The Haunting of Harrington House, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/The Haunting of Harrington House.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with. And don't forget to sign your reply with. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 05:16, 25 May 2024 (UTC)