User talk:Hyfjtc

October 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Motion Picture Association of America has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Motion Picture Association of America was changed by Hyfjtc (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.879463 on 2014-10-11T21:36:41+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:36, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Motion Picture Association of America film rating system. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Neil N  talk to me 21:43, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Formatting inconsistent with the Manual of Style for Television.
Hi, your edits here are not consistent with Wikipedia's Manual of Style for Television. We don't need italics and [[WP:BOLDFACE|boldface to denote premieres and finales. This content is easily gleaned by looking at the table of episodes. We also don't need other formatting to indicate holiday specials. You have previously submitted similar changes and they have been reverted. Please do not submit them again without first achieving consensus on the article's talk page. Please also familiarize yourself with the Manual of Style for Television as your edits are contravening all of the television formatting guidelines. If you submit the content again, sadly, it will have to be considered disruptive. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:01, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dilogy
Hello, Hyfjtc. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Dilogy, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:


 * 1) [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit edit the page]
 * 2) remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Domdeparis (talk) 15:01, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Dilogy for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dilogy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dilogy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.Icewhiz (talk) 19:58, 12 November 2017 (UTC)