User talk:Hypernick1980

Fred Meyer
Do not post libel and other personal information against current or former users of Wikipedia. Do not make excessive Reverts in order to protect your libelous postings.
 * Hold on just a second, what libel did I post. I stated that the information presented by this former member were false, I never violated the three revert rule, and I was not the only person that reverted the information. Hypernick1980 05:49, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

Posting that the user whom posted the information is in "violation of Wikipedia policies" is libel and personal information. If you felt that the accuracy of the information was incorrect, you could have stated just that -- that you believed it was false, rather than make excessive reverts in an attempt to assasinate the credibility of the user.

Image Tagging Image:Saltpalace2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Saltpalace2.jpg. I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag, so its copyright status is therefore unclear. Please add a tag to let us know its copyright status. (If you created/took the picture then you can use to release it under the GFDL. If you can claim fair use use  .)  If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know on the image description page where you got the images and I'll tag them for you. Otherwise, see Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have tagged them, too. Note that any unsourced and untagged imaged will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thanks so much. --Nv8200p (talk) 02:36, 24 September 2005 (UTC)

KTVX
You have received this message because you have edited a Salt Lake City media article in the past. We have recently had an edit war regarding the wording and inclusion of a paragraph on the KTVX article. In hopes of resolving this I have put together an informal survey. If you are interested, please stop by Talk:KTVX and add a vote. Thanks, A 09:20, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
re: your recent edit. That topic has been discussed on Wiki, in several areas, and resolved to read List of religions once classed as cults. Please see that article. Best wishes. WBardwin 06:24, 23 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia equals group concensus. After long -- very long -- discussions on a variety of articles, this is where the LDS movement has been placed in Wiki.  You may not agree.  That is fine.  On List of groups referred to as cults it reads Inclusion of a group within this list is dependent upon that group being labelled a "cult" or "sect" by one or more of the listed sources. It does not imply that it has been proved, in any manner, that that group is a "cult" or "sect".  Definitions, sources, and materials can all be cited, but Wikipedia's efforts are toward NPOV.  True neutrality may be unattainable on religious articles, and that topic is often debated here as faith and a religion's place in the cosmos cannot be proven.  But, your assertion probably belongs on the talk page at List of religions once classed as cults, where you can interact with editors involved in those discussions.   Best wishes.  WBardwin 06:43, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

AT&T
First of all, I did wait a week to gather a concensus. I waited even longer. Second, the page has been split, so why did you wit until now to say you oppose the split? aido2002 19:44, 2 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Look, the articles need to be split, and they were. And now that you started the unessicary voting on it, you'll see that HARLDY ANYONE DISAGREES! That's it! I resplit the articles, and would appriciate it if you stop trying to rejoin them! Why should they be rejoined? aido2002 06:13, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

Checkuser complete
You made a request for a Checkuser to be run, which has now been completed. See Requests for CheckUser for the results. the wub "?!"  22:26, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

Call for Ogden-area Wikipedians
Hypernick1980, I am a reporter for the Standard-Examiner and am doing a story about those in our community who contribute to the Wikipedia. Would you be willing to be interviewed for the article. Please contact me at jmuhlestein@standard.net and let me know if you are willing to talk to me. Thanks.

Non-free use disputed for Image:SLCGElast.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:SLCGElast.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:53, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

U.S. 91
Thanks for fixing the inaccuracies I left in the U.S. Route 91 article. I had been working on cleaning up the article, but got sloppy in the section you fixed. Davemeistermoab 16:53, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Saltpalace.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Saltpalace.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:25, 28 January 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Remember the dot (talk) 19:25, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

No content in Category:Venues of the 2002 Winter Olympic Games
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Venues of the 2002 Winter Olympic Games, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Venues of the 2002 Winter Olympic Games has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1). To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Venues of the 2002 Winter Olympic Games, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 15:30, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Utah Wikipedia Meetup
--Admrb♉ltz (talk) 22:21, 15 September 2008 (UTC) via AWB

December 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States
--Kumioko (talk) 02:39, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

January 2012 Newsletter for WikiProject United States and supported projects
--Kumi-Taskbot (talk) 19:04, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

2012 estimate of population of La Verkin
Thanks for adding the updated information; however it seems that it might be inaccurate, could you source it please. I have placed  templates around it. I say this, because I am one of the 2,000+ residents and have been for 6 years, and I have not noticed A) a distinct drop in population, and B) that many empty houses. I could be wrong, I am often wrong, but just throw that source up there. Thanks speednat (talk) 20:38, 25 February 2014 (UTC)


 * I see the problem: the 2010 data was wrong, I have since updated the 2010 data to the correct number; however could you still throw in the sources for your data. If not, I will do it later. ... Ps You don't need to reply on my page as I will watch yours. Thanks speednat (talk) 21:49, 25 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Thanks I forgot how to do this it's been a while since I've edited on Wikipedia. Have a great day Hypernick1980 (talk) 04:07, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Gay Pride Week listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Gay Pride Week. Since you had some involvement with the Gay Pride Week redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. TonyBallioni (talk) 21:55, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

2019 US Banknote Contest
Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk)