User talk:Hypersonic man 11

November 2019
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Henry Danger. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. MPFitz1968 (talk) 11:18, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

December 2019
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Air China Flight 129, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Samf4u (talk) 13:52, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. McSly (talk) 13:50, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

January 2020
Your recent editing history at Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. McSly (talk) 04:21, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of GHL Systems


A tag has been placed on GHL Systems, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement of https://www.ghl.com/about-us. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Razer ( talk ) 08:34, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mr. DIY


A tag has been placed on Mr. DIY requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Razer ( talk ) 08:34, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Hypersonic man 11. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Razer ( talk ) 08:35, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Siasun robotics


A tag has been placed on Siasun robotics requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 06:01, 2 February 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Siasun Robotics for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Siasun Robotics is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Siasun Robotics until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Abishe (talk) 14:02, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

I am sorry. Can you Please give me some time to improve the page. I am sure I can do it well. Hypersonic man 11 (talk) 08:27, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Siasun Robotics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SSE ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Siasun_Robotics check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Siasun_Robotics?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:27, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for reminding me. The "sse" is the stock exchange short name.

Hypersonic man 11 (talk) 11:48, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

Good Article icon
Hello! I wanted to let you know that one of your recent contributions has been undone because it added the Good Article template to China Southern Airlines, an article that has not been promoted by the Good Article Nomination process. If you believe that this article meets the Good Article Criteria, then you are encouraged to nominate it for review by following the Good Article nominating instructions. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Good Article Nominations talk page. Thank you. -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 13:12, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sekolah Jenis Kebangsaan (C) Tun Tan Siew Sin


The article Sekolah Jenis Kebangsaan (C) Tun Tan Siew Sin has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Primary school, no evidence of notability"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 14:15, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Sekolah Jenis Kebangsaan (C) Tun Tan Siew Sin for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sekolah Jenis Kebangsaan (C) Tun Tan Siew Sin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Sekolah Jenis Kebangsaan (C) Tun Tan Siew Sin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fram (talk) 06:41, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of CDF Duty Free


A tag has been placed on CDF Duty Free requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.cdfg.com.cn/dutyFreeBusiness/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fuddle (talk) 19:36, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

User group topicons
The topicons on your userpage claim that you have many user rights that you don't actually have. The display of such topicons when you don't have the user right is highly discouraged. - ZLEA T\C 12:32, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

August 2020
The topicons on your userpage claim that you have many user rights that you don't actually have. The display of such topicons when you don't have the user right is highly discouraged. David notMD (talk) 13:28, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

November 2020
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Ethiopian Airlines. Jetstreamer $Talk$ 12:03, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

February 2021
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Type 056 corvette, you may be blocked from editing. Cordless Larry (talk) 10:08, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

July 2021
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as at Teahouse, (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment, or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button OOjs UI icon signature-ltr.svg located above the edit window.

Thank you. &#8213; Qwerfjkl talk  10:39, 22 July 2021 (UTC)


 * thank you, noted Hypersonic man 11 (talk) 10:41, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, People's Liberation Army Air Force. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. Cordless Larry (talk) 15:30, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

People's Liberation Army Air Force
 PLEASE STOP  changing or removing reliably sourced, content as you have done on  the People's Liberation Army Air Force article. If you continue these disruptive actions you may be permanently blocked from editing - FOX 52 talk! 16:43, 23 July 2021 (UTC)


 * these are not reliable sources, Flightglobal @2021 reports are just guesses. If they are real, how come we don't know what's happening in somewhere xinjiang! Hypersonic man 11 (talk) 03:04, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
 * refer to this negotiation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Teahouse#This_ain%27t_real%21...
 * I will be clearing the source and replace with unknown until further discussion. Hypersonic man 11 (talk) 11:22, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Pinging @FOX 52 &#8213; Qwerfjkl talk  11:56, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:CS/LR19


Hello, Hypersonic man 11. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "LR19".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 23:08, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

March 2022
Hello, I'm RovingPersonalityConstruct. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.

After about 2.5 years of editing and reminders by other editors (including myself) you should know by now that: Then, you took the above two points and went on to misattribute information from a deprecated source to a completely different source (here and here.)
 * Your additions must be verifiable (WP:VERIFY) and that it is your responsibility to ensure that they are (WP:BURDEN); you failed to do that here
 * You should not use deprecated sources (WP:DEPRECATED); which you did here

It's time to respect consensus and develop conscientious editing skills. - RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs) 11:34, 18 March 2022 (UTC)


 * @RovingPersonalityConstruct Which article are you pointing out, lecturer. Since I'm not allowed to add Chinese origin state media reports on my Chinese based articles, what do you want me to do? Speak for the inaccuracy and misleading old information, wise lecturer. Hypersonic man 11 (talk) 11:56, 18 March 2022 (UTC)


 * @RovingPersonalityConstruct The Fuzhou class reverted edit is filled with prejudicement and injustice within the whole Wikipedia factbook and regulations. Look at the talkpage... How am I supposed to add that Global Times link on this ironic and catastrophically horrible site. How do you get the newest info other than Chinese state media. Speak for yourself with your inadequate 2.5 years experience. Scram off you've lecture me couple of times but this time, it is unacceptable. Hypersonic man 11 (talk) 12:00, 18 March 2022 (UTC)


 * @RovingPersonalityConstruct if you have your eyes wide opened, read the article from GT. What a foolish act. Hypersonic man 11 (talk) 12:01, 18 March 2022 (UTC)


 * @RovingPersonalityConstruct I noticed this severe crisis and issue, when the state media publishes info now, you must wait for foreign media to literally copy and paste the article until you can cite the exact same thing. bullish Hypersonic man 11 (talk) 12:03, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
 * what is this? an authorized verifying machine? Hypersonic man 11 (talk) 12:04, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=1077388283&diffmode=source
 * This is baseless, I could've added a SCMP source. Hypersonic man 11 (talk) 14:30, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

If you feel so strongly about the existing consensus, then the best thing you can do is get involved in the community process and try to change it. For example, if you disagree with Global Times being on the deprecated list, you should raise that concern at Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Check out the sections of Village pump too, if you are so inclined.

But regardless of the outcome, your edits are subject to Verifiability and Consensus. Yes, that may very well mean you may not edit in the way that you like; that's just the way it is. - RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs) 21:00, 18 March 2022 (UTC)


 * I did argue about it, fellow democratic and idiotic individuals on this platform just deem it a propaganda powerhouse... So, that's it. As for the WS-15 page, I'm going to add a verified source. For the Fuzhou class destroyer, I'm going to undo it and try to add the GT source. Hypersonic man 11 (talk) 02:04, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Stop throwing in those regulation pages. I'm not going to open it because it is baseless. Wikipedia should be neutral and sourced properly Hypersonic man 11 (talk) 02:08, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
 * This suck Hypersonic man 11 (talk) 10:10, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

October 2022
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at China. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. intforce (talk) 14:23, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Kajang Line Revert
Please look at the reference first before you deem as unreferenced. It is inside the top line. “All trainsets data are as follows (updated December 2022)” There’s no point of me flooding the table with the same reference tag. Stop reverting with said accusation. Vincent LUFan (talk) (Kenton!) 03:06, 21 December 2022 (UTC)


 * @Vincent60030 fanpage isn't an accurate source, cite something directly from Prasarana or MRT Hypersonic man 11 (talk) 03:33, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
 * As I mentioned yesterday, MOT/Prasarana Bhd., not fanpage. Please take note here. Hypersonic man 11 (talk) 03:34, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
 * If you insist to proceed further with the citation, may I know where is the data from the fanpage sourced from? Is it from Prasarana or MOT. Hypersonic man 11 (talk) 03:38, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
 * if not, that's clearly just an enthusiast-runned fanpage without clear verification and is considered unofficial Hypersonic man 11 (talk) 03:39, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
 * You should do train tracking yourself and stop calling it a fanpage. It is a legitimate way of collecting data whether trains are seen or not. It is so simple. Don’t make this overcomplicating. Also can you stop preaching Prasarana or MOT as a reliable source? They are primary sources. WP:Primary Primary sources are less reliable than secondary sources. Do you need Prasarana people to go down and scout at every station to track which trains are in service? Use common sense. Vincent LUFan (talk) (Kenton!) 04:27, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Also a word of advice, stop thinking you’re improving an article by only removing content. That’s not what editing is about. You have better tasks to help with than to remove things only. Vincent LUFan (talk) (Kenton!) 04:27, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
 * That's a fanpage, it's even written within the website name. Who's doing the train tracking, how can the process be independently verified? Even so, Prasarana Bhd. or MOT are the only source that's reliable, fanpage are enthusiast-runned and isn't official, accurate or verified in any sense.
 * Furthermore, YES INDEED, Prasarana does have a team of technician at the depot to service rolling stocks and record their status, this job ULTIMATELY COMES DOWN TO PRASARANA/MOT instead of UNOFFICIAL FANPAGE.
 * Moreover, I didn't claim that any articles have been improved as the data got sweepingly deleted, it's just removing unverified facts and making the page more accurate, that is ultimately better than adding unverified and inaccurate yet misleading contents, as someone clearly did with the design, ridership data, and rolling stock status by citing unreliable fanpage runned by enthusiasts as well as voiding the citation.
 * A word of advice from me, mind your attitude and the way you express yourself, it's very naïve to attack someone rudely directly or indirectly on this free online encyclopedia. Hypersonic man 11 (talk) 05:14, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Also, how is the trainset data collected, and where is it collected. Why are there unknowns and who is doing it? Hypersonic man 11 (talk) 05:17, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
 * MLPTF has its own verification done regularly. Plus it is also a registered organisation. It is official under ROS body. Again, primary sources include direct information given by the organisation who operates the railway. Data should be collected from independent people like rail enthusiasts AND the public who independently contribute to the trainset tracking database. I am pretty sure all Wikipedians can fly over to Kuala Lumpur and verify the trainsets themselves if that makes it more verifiable. Everyone have eyes to see. Why should data be collected only from the depot? MLPTF whilst being able to seek for verification, there is also a strict SOP on the status of trainsets. Unknown is not something fixed, and should not be held accountable for verifiability. However, it is different from “not spotted” due to the extent of the duration of the train being missing. Vincent LUFan (talk) (Kenton!) 08:10, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Judgement is just an user opinion and isn't accepted unless solid proof is shown. Still a fanpage, it's not official, verified nor accurate in any sense, too much unknowns, not spotted or guessing within the large table of data. Also, they've been train missing and not found since nearly 2 years ago, or train slated as decommissioned and is believed to be under repair in depot since the last century. Ultimately, there's to much uncertainty and inaccurate data to be classified as a proper source. Hypersonic man 11 (talk) 13:56, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
 * MLPFT's SOP, procedure or process, whether as a registered or a non-profit fanpage, all of the above are mostly just user opinion and it is undeniable that MLPFT functions as a fanpage and as a rail-enthusiasts-runned unverified site that isn't accurate. Hypersonic man 11 (talk) 13:58, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
 * I also want to clear the air that I apologise if my attitude protrayed hostility or passive aggressiveness. My intentions were to help on editing efficiency while being able to provide as much information as possible. I do not condone uncited sources should be read, but knowledge is knowledge. And my biggest priority, imho, should be to help expand content. Usually my last resort is to remove said content, which I have proven myself during my good article edit “marathons”. I do my best to hold the highest standards. And arguments do happen. But I just want the best for the reader ultimately. I hope you understand. I am also looking for a compromise to move the trainsets to a list, which I am ultimately seeking from others’ opinion too. Hope to hear from you soon. Sincerely, Vincent LUFan (talk) (Kenton!) 08:10, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

Editing news 2023 #1
Read this in another language • Subscription list for this newsletter

This newsletter includes two key updates about the Editing team's work:


 * 1) The Editing team will finish adding new features to the Talk pages project and deploy it.
 * 2) They are beginning a new project, Edit check.

Talk pages project

The Editing team is nearly finished with this first phase of the Talk pages project. Nearly all new features are available now in the Beta Feature for.

It will show information about how active a discussion is, such as the date of the most recent comment. There will soon be a new "" button. You will be able to turn them off at Special:Preferences. Please tell them what you think.



An A/B test for on the mobile site has finished. Editors were more successful with. The Editing team is enabling these features for all editors on the mobile site.

New Project: Edit Check

The Editing team is beginning a project to help new editors of Wikipedia. It will help people identify some problems before they click "". The first tool will encourage people to add references when they add new content. Please watch that page for more information. You can join a conference call on 3 March 2023 to learn more.

–Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 18:19, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)