User talk:Hypnôs

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from deleting comments in a Talk Page such as Talk:Sphinx water erosion hypothesis that seek to improve on the article. Bill the Cat 7 (talk) 21:00, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

Hello,I am Historydiver,I am trying to make a new page on Wikipedia, It's Duan Kan,but it's in construction currently, I need help please.(talk) 9:02 PM ,Tuesday, January 30 ,2024(CTZ) — Preceding undated comment added 03:05, 31 January 2024 (UTC)


 * @Historydiver Hey, if you want to create an article, here is a guide for you: Help:Your first article. It's best to create a draft first, so you can take your time writing it, without it being deleted. Hypnôs (talk) 03:13, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Younger Dryas and it's Impact Hypothesis
Aloha @Hypnôs! Please don't misunderstand my comments on Talk:Younger Dryas. I now see that you have a great deal of experience in this citation method and usage of footnotes from looking at the site Great Pyramid of Giza where you are a major contributor. This appears to be a well written article and I have bookmarked it for later reading.

Looking at Template:Sfn, I was able to implement a few of the basic examples in my sandbox and realized that other less experienced users, such as Dudley Miles and Proxy Data who have knowledge that could improve Wikipedia in these areas may have difficulty using the Sfn method I think that Gilgamesh's concern may have addressed his own issue by inserting carriage returns so that each line of the Template:Cite is on a separate line in source editing mode. The only edits I found for Gilgamesh are regarding this formatting useful for source editing, except for the major revert to content added by Dudley Miles on Talk:Younger Dryas.

I suggest that you look for a site other than Younger Dryas or YDIH that is more stable, and has less citations to introduce this citation method. It has several advantages, and in the Giza Pyramid article you answered a question I had about making the Bibliography alphabetical by first author last name. Reading over the Sfn template, there may be some other methods that may make it easier for new editors. I would also support documenting a case for the Wikipedia template developers to help automate this method to make something similar to the Visual editor Cite button support the Automated and Re-Use functions. For example, the "Cite: button could have a choice for "Inline HTML reference" (the current functionality), a raw citation (as in the Bibliography section of Giza), and generate and Sfn tag (where the user could enter the tag, (e.g., [Author_Name YYYYa]) instead of Sfn automatically entering the tag. Dmcdysan (talk) 20:48, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 24
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Emerald Tablets of Thoth the Atlantean, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hermetic.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 24 March 2024 (UTC)