User talk:Hyunsoo Lee/sandbox

Peer Review
I think what you have so far is a great start! It seems like you've found a lot of really good sources to use and have given a lot of thought into even small changes you'd like to make within the overall article. Coming from the perspective as someone who doesn't know much at all about this topic it would be nice to maybe provide some examples of studies or current research that has been done using phytoliths. I think that by doing so you could help give a bit more context to why using phytoliths is useful. When I read through the current article that seemed to be missing a bit, even though there's a small section in the "History of phytolith research" I think even giving one example of a research paper which has been published on this topic would be really nice. Overall though I think your plans sound great and I'm looking forward to seeing what you come up with!

Sylerb 19:03, 16 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Thank you so much for the kind comments! Hyunsoo Lee (talk) 20:15, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

comments
This choice is excellent...I am surprised there is very little content on paleoecology using phytoliths currently in Wikipedia! You will make a great contribution. Some things to consider: 1) taxonomic resolution of phytoliths, 2) indicators of vegetation structure (for example, new research shows the light environment affects phytolith morphology ). This also looks like good article Try to locate the broadest review articles on the topic of phytolith analysis. Answer.to.the.rock (talk) 13:42, 25 May 2017 (UTC)