User talk:Hzxzhang

Welcome!
Hello, Hzxzhang, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Hangzhou Travelsky, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! creffett (talk) 12:43, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Hangzhou Travelsky


A tag has been placed on Draft:Hangzhou Travelsky, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. creffett (talk) 12:43, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

COI
You have an obvious conflict of interest and you must declare it. If you work directly or indirectly for an organisation, or otherwise are acting on its behalf, you are very strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. If you are paid directly or indirectly by the organisation you are writing about, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:   . If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared. Concealing a COI can lead to a block. Please do not edit further until you respond to this message. Also read the following regarding writing an article


 * you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the organisation, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the organisation claims or interviewing its management. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls
 * The notability guidelines for organisations and companies have been updated. The primary criteria has five components that must be evaluated separately and independently to determine if it is met:
 * significant coverage in
 * independent,
 * multiple,
 * reliable,
 * secondary sources.
 * Note that an individual source must meet all four criteria to be counted towards notability.


 * you must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic.
 * there shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
 * you must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. You must also reply to the COI request above Jimfbleak - talk to me?  13:23, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

Reply
Thanks for declaring your conflict of interest. You need to make sure that you read and follow the guidance above to the letter. Looking at your draft, it didn't have a single in-line reference, just a link to your website, it didn't have a single wikilink (like Hangzhou) and it appears to be a text dump from an unknown source. If it's a copy of one of your own documents, either an English original or in translation from Mandarin, it can't be used here since your website claims copyright; see my original post. Much of it isn't even written in sentences. You also use opinions or loaded terms like leading and successful.

See, for example, Tesco as an example of a decent company article. Yours doesn't need that level of detail, but it shows you how a company article should be written, with comprehensive neutral text and independent sources. You should take your time over this. Although your COI statement saves you from an immediate block, if it's felt that your future attempts aren't compliant with our guidance, you could still be blocked as WP:Not here. Concentrate on writing about the company as a whole, not lists of products, and ask if you are unsure what is acceptable. Jimfbleak - talk to me?  05:36, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
 * You don't have to start a new section on a talk page if it's the same thread. Just indent using colons, as I've done here, so that it's easy to see who is saying what. There is no minimum requirement for references, although for a company article you will be expected to reference pretty well everything you claim. You should only use the company website for completely uncontroversial stuff like where it is, name of boss and similar. All drafts when submitted are assessed by humans, no bots or filters involved. Any review won't be by me either. :I'm not sure if you are asking for the return of the deleted text, but thta's not a good idea since it was deleted even as a draft. There are no refs to salvage, and the text needs a complete rewrite. It's good practice to save the text on your laptop or whatever before you post it here, so you have something to fall back on if it's deleted again. Refs don't need to be in English, but if they are not, include |language =Chinese (or whatever) as a parameter. The more you can say about the company other than what it sells, the more likely it is to survive, and if the company has been criticised, fined or anything else, you should include the negative stuff too.