User talk:I'm On Base

 I'm On  Base 's Current talk page

userbox
how about this one, bro. 3nih (talk)

RfB
Just now, someone tranascluded the RfB you created a couple of days ago to WP:RFA. I've removed it. Was this what you wanted, or was this done without your knowledge? --barneca (talk) 01:35, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Your RfB
I strongly suggest you immediately withdraw your RfB. You are completely unqualified for this position, and your nomination reflects badly on you. It will be rejected. Please save yourself and everyone else the trouble of multiple opposes before it is closed early by someone else. Thanks, Gwernol 01:36, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Gwernol, User:LAX transcluded it, not I'm on Base. I'm not entirely sure I'm on Base even knew it was live, and suspect this was a test.  I've removed it from WP:RFA (see above), and plan to delete it as a test page unless I'm on Base gives me a good reason not to.  I'm on Base, is this OK with you? --barneca (talk) 01:40, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes, this is certainly possible, although I'm On Base accepted his self-nomination, so deserves at least some of the "credit" for this. Gwernol 02:06, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Actually, I'm On Base didn't accept the nomination, even though it was a self nom. I've also asked the admin who transcluded to comment on their talk. SynergeticMaggot (talk) 02:21, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Hmmm... perhaps you're right. I was reading this as a signed acceptance. I guess it technically doesn't say "I accept", though I initially read it as an accepted RfB. Gwernol 02:26, 9 May 2008 (UTC)


 * I closed the RfB, as you are not an admin yet, and this is grounds to immediately remove and close. I suggest you read WP:ADMIN and WP:CRAT, as well as anything in Category:Wikipedia adminship. Please don't let this stop you from contributing to wikipedia. Best wishes. SynergeticMaggot (talk) 02:04, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

mushroomhead7697
he is a sockpuppet of TheGoodSide. he made it first and used his "good" account and the sockpuppet one one for evil


 * Since I've now confirmed that this isn't your first time violating WP:SOCK, you can now consider yourself indefinitely banned from Wikipedia now. --  Netsnipe  ►  04:36, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: I've deleted all sub-pages save User:I'm On Base/Awards and User:I'm On Base/Guestbook (Lists to watch for possible existing socks); and the talk page archives. - jc37 05:14, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Looking at this and wondering if we need a checkuser. - jc37 05:49, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

please
Hey I'm On Base, I'm glad to see you back here after waiting about a year. I see you're willing to contribute positively this time, so I hope your request is granted. Cheers,  iMatthew  talk  at 20:45, 11 August 2009 (UTC)


 * I'm not going to be the first to decline, but just so you know you may have to take this one up with ArbCom. Exploding Boy (talk) 23:01, 11 August 2009 (UTC)


 * I am not inclined to unblock. The following would help.  First, apart from the possibility that you might not continue to abuse Wikipedia, I don't see what Wikipedia stands to gain from unblocking you.  What would you contribute if unblocked?  Second, it's impossible to unblock you without you giving a full list of all your alternate accounts and IP addresses: as it stands now your last word on the subject is to continue to deny that you had ever used sockpuppets: that cannot stand.  Mango juice talk 05:38, 12 August 2009 (UTC)


 * I agree with Mangojuice. Please post a new unblock request with the following information:
 * The areas you would like to contribute in, and how you intend to do so
 * A list of all accounts you have used, including any IP addresses you are aware of. Do not omit any; this can be verified.
 * You may also wish to review this guide for more information, and you may want to consider following the instructions here as well. Hers fold  (t/a/c) 03:33, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

You have not as yet given us the alternative account names which you used simultaneously. This is absolutely essential as a preliminary to any consideration of your request. --Anthony.bradbury"talk" 18:25, 20 September 2009 (UTC)