User talk:I'm Tony Ahn/Archive

Confirmed
Hey, I noticed you created this alternate account, so I've gone ahead and given it confirmed status - that should help speed up the initial setup. Cheers, m.o.p  06:17, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks! I&#39;m Tony Ahn (talk) 06:20, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

Hello Tony
I read your page on PR professionals editing, and it seems like a sincere and transparent attempt to discuss some important issues. I am not a PR pro, but have gotten involved with Corporate Representatives for Ethical Wikipedia Editing in an an attempt to convey the attitudes and concerns of committed editors. I believe that the quality of the edits is what should be judged, rather than the pay stubs of the editors. However, I believe that COI is a real concern, and that behavioral standards including frank disclosure, are important to maintaining the integrity of the project. When it comes to disclosure, you seem to meet the standard very well. I look forward to an in-depth discussion. 174.234.4.22 (talk) 03:08, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for writing! Thanks for your kind words. Where should we have this discussion? How should I contact you? I&#39;m Tony Ahn (talk) 03:23, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia and PR
Hello there, Tony. I recently came across your essay about PR engagement of Wikipedia, and there's a lot I liked about it. I too represent clients on Wikipedia, and this is also my secondary account, siloing the fun from the profit. Sounds like your approach is very much along the same lines, and I'd like to point you in the direction of some related efforts which have started just since the first of the year:


 * WikiProject Cooperation, and more specifically its Paid Editor Help page
 * Corporate Representatives for Ethical Wikipedia Engagement (CREWE) on Facebook

Looking at your Talk page, I see that someone mentioned CREWE to you recently, but didn't provide a proper link. So I hope this helps, and I hope you consider joining up. Cheers, WWB Too (talk) 14:00, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi, thanks for the invite. I joined CREWE last month, and I'm aware of Wikiproject Cooperation. I've been pursuing a solution to the issue independently for a few months now, and have buy-in from several important stakeholders. Will be able to share quite soon how that's going. Hope to chat more soon, when I have something to report. I&#39;m Tony Ahn (talk) 16:41, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

Rajo
Hi Tony. My opinion is that the Rajo biography is notable in Wikipedia terms. I feel like the paragraph that begins "In 2008" needs to be sourced out, or severely trimmed if all that material can not be found in published sources. You should attempt to identify his place of birth, occupation of his parents, and locate the high school he attended. I've made a few tweaks. It still has a somewhat promotional flavor and I'd advise another set of eyes to tweak things before the article is moved to mainspace. Best regards, —Tim //// Carrite (talk) 23:47, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I've been working on place of birth and occupation of his parents, no luck. However, I found that his high school has a Wikipedia entry, so I Wikilinked and added the location. Also took out that paragraph you mentioned. It isn't super integral to the article anyway. Thanks for your suggestions! I&#39;m Tony Ahn (talk) 00:20, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

Moved
I moved your request here so others will be more likely to see it. And i've left a response. Silver seren C 00:12, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Hey thanks! Will respond there. I&#39;m Tony Ahn (talk) 00:20, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Left a question for you there. Silver  seren C 01:08, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

Article move completed
The article is now at Rajo Laurel. Now all you need to do is add some categories and it should be good to go.

By the way, are you okay with this being submitted to Did You Know? I can go and do the nomination for you and all of that. I would just need you to let me know if there's a hook sentence that you'd prefer. Or I can just make one up myself. Silver seren C 20:46, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I'd love a DYK submission actually, thanks! No preference for the hook. I&#39;m Tony Ahn (talk) 20:52, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Nomination done
You can keep an eye on it here. Silver seren C 02:54, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks so much! I&#39;m Tony Ahn (talk) 05:14, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Local Splash
Don't really see anything there adding up to notability. Ninety employees, tiny revenues, "coverage" consisting of rankings in the "Top 5,000"; just not much there. -- Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  15:04, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your assessment. I've been telling them they need more press. I'll keep this in my sandbox until that happens. I&#39;m Tony Ahn (talk) 22:04, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Yeah, looking over the sources that exist, they are all invariably Business Wire or Market Wire, which means they are press releases. I'm not finding any true independent coverage. Silver  seren C 02:16, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Appreciate your review, thanks! I&#39;m Tony Ahn (talk) 02:19, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Rajo Laurel
Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:06, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Local Splash
Hi Tony, What is it that you do to get paid to edit pages? From the best of my understanding my boss might have traded some SEO services for a Wikipage and had me write the page. What's the best way to disclose this? I don't appreciate what you said, as I know nothing of what Local Splash might have said to you. I'm merely following orders in maintaining this page's integrity and articles for creation states nothing of how many indices or how deep they have to be to establish notability. Additionally, any other edits I've made have also been as a request of my boss as well. JeffBordeaux (talk) 06:09, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Answered most of these questions on the AfD page. In response to you not appreciating this, I'll invoke Ignorantia juris non excusat. In addition, I assume your job pays you a salary. If that's the case, the time you spend writing a Wikipedia article, you're being paid. Here at Wikipedia, that puts you in the category of "paid editor" which has specific guidelines and rules. I&#39;m Tony Ahn (talk) 00:26, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Ingrid Chua-Go
 Harrias  talk 00:02, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Rembrandt Flores
My review of Rembrandt Flores was very cursory. I just confirmed that it would likely pass an WP:AFD challenge. I did not really do a quality review. My review was probably more cursory than even a DYK review. No need to return the favor. However, I see you are a GOCE member. I have a lot of articles that have can use a GOCE review. Are you a sports fan?--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 05:32, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Not really, but that doesn't matter. I'm happy to help out. Point me to one. I&#39;m Tony Ahn (talk) 05:36, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

OKBot
Hello, Tony. You can add the website you want covered into this page.--OsamaK (talk) 14:06, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Rembrandt Flores
Allen3 talk 00:29, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Stratford Residences (November 2)
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [ Articles for creation help desk], or on the [ . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! — Mr. Stradivarius  ♪ talk ♪ 02:04, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Xander Angeles (November 2)
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [ Articles for creation help desk], or on the [ . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! — Mr. Stradivarius  ♪ talk ♪ 02:49, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: When in Manila (November 2)
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [ Articles for creation help desk], or on the [ . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! — Mr. Stradivarius  ♪ talk ♪ 03:01, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at AfC Xander Angeles was accepted
 Xander Angeles, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! — Mr. Stradivarius  ♪ talk ♪ 11:42, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

When In Manila
I've replied on my talk page regarding Xander Angeles and When In Manila. I've also submitted the When In Manila article to AfD at Articles for deletion/When In Manila, which you are welcome to contribute to. — Mr. Stradivarius  ♪ talk ♪ 12:03, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Tim Yap
Hello! Your submission of Tim Yap at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! — Maile (talk) 01:39, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Tim Yap
The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/When in Manila


Hello I&#39;m Tony Ahn. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "When in Manila".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 13:39, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Hi, thanks. The article passed AfC and is up, so no worries. I&#39;m Tony Ahn (talk) 09:15, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Staff Virtual
Hi Tony. I'm requesting your page be moved to draft space, which is where we typically handle requests of the sort you made. I have a potential conflict of interest so I am not moving it myself but this should get the attention of uninvolved editors. You can also speed things up by putting AfC submission at the top of your page and deleting the edit request from its talkpage, and it should get handled faster from that template. Edit requests are really backlogged, but articles for creation are only a little backlogged! Frieda Beamy (talk) 19:49, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks, but I prefer the system I've set up and been using, which isn't violating any rules. Unless you're acceding to a request (and in this case the request was to move an article to mainspace, not draft space), please don't remove things from my userspace without asking me first. Further, you've now caused the article to be re-date stamped so it is listed at the top of the queue again. I have put it back where I want it and will request speedy deletion in the draft space. I&#39;m Tony Ahn (talk) 22:58, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
 * I apologize, Tony. I was trying to get additional attention for the article, as I would not be qualified either to move to mainspace or to flag the article as nonnotable. To fix the datestamp technically, you can drop the speedy deletion and ask for the page to be moved back instead. Or you can use AfC submission, use the old timestamp for the ts variable, and then explain why it was backdated (I'll vouch for that). AFC gets faster replies than edit requests. Frieda Beamy (talk) 23:54, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
 * What is your COI with the subject of the article? I&#39;m Tony Ahn (talk) 23:57, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
 * I have just answered that generally on my disclosure page. I also said at WP:PAIDHELP (section "Assisting with queues") that I am staying away from direct involvement with requests from other PR types but I hope my indirect involvement has been useful as the draft did get more attention. If User:Wilipino does not respond you can always go back to requested moves. You can also comment on datestamps here. Frieda Beamy (talk) 18:16, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

December 2014 GOCE newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:15, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

GOCE holiday 2014 newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:44, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

GOCE 2014 report
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:55, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

February 2015 GOCE newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:52, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

GOCE March newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:41, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

April 2015 GOCE newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:29, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

GOCE June 2015 newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:08, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

GOCE August 2015 newsletter

 * sent by via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:43, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

October 2015 GOCE newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors April 2016 Newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:48, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Martin Shirran


The article Martin Shirran has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (biographies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back. Thank you. This proposed deletion was started by User:Piotrus

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 20:47, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Martin Shirran for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Martin Shirran is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Martin Shirran until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 15:31, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

WikiProject assessment tags for talk pages
Thank you for your recent articles, including John Lemp, which I read with interest. When you create a new article, can you add the WikiProject assessment templates to the talk of that article? See the talk page of the article I mentioned for an example of what I mean. Usually it is very simple, you just add something like to the article's talk, with keyword replaced by the associated WikiProject (ex. if it's a biography article, you would use WikiProject Biography; if it's a United States article, you would use WikiProject United States, and so on). You do not have to rate the article if you do not want to, others will do it eventually. Those templates are very useful, as they bring the articles to a WikiProject attention, and allow them to start tracking the articles through Article alerts and other tools. For example, WikiProject Poland relies on such templates to generate listings such as Article Alerts, Popular Pages, Quality and Importance Matrix and the Cleanup Listing. Thanks to them, WikiProject members are more easily able to defend your work from deletion, or simply help try to improve it further. Feel free to ask me any questions if you'd like more information about using those talk page templates. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 13:33, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
 * That would require me to figure out which Wikiprojects are associated with each article, something I know little about. Wikipedia, being the encyclopedia anyone can edit, has other editors more capable than I of selecting and adding the appropriate Wikiproject. Thanks for adding them to John Lemp's article. I&#39;m Tony Ahn (talk) 18:49, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Lisa Tenner for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lisa Tenner is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Lisa Tenner until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 13:40, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Help!
I've lost access to my alternate account. The email address associated with it is no longer valid and I can't remember the password. However the account (User:Noraft) clearly identifies this account (User:I'm Tony Ahn) as being owned by the same person. I&#39;m Tony Ahn (talk) 08:10, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
 * If I'm correct, there is no possible way to recover a lost password without an email. &mdash; Music1201  talk  00:15, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
 * , I've been reading Logging in:What if I forget the password?, and it looks like perhaps you should be posting this at WP:AN. If there is a way to recover your alternate account, they should be able to help there. — Maile  (talk) 14:25, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Horse Races Now


The article Horse Races Now has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (software) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back. Thank you. This proposed deletion was started by User:Piotrus

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 13:04, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

John Lemp
I think he is notable, but you forgot categories. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 18:21, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
 * I didn't forget anything, as it isn't my responsibility to add anything to Wikipedia, the encyclopedia anyone can edit. If you think he belongs in categories, add him to some. I&#39;m Tony Ahn (talk) 19:01, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Staff Virtual


The article Staff Virtual has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back. Thank you. This proposed deletion was started by User:Piotrus

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 13:47, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. FoCuS contribs ;  talk to me!  00:32, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Paid editing inquiry
Hello I&#39;m Tony Ahn. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a black hat practice. Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly. Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. Please disclose all articles which you previously or currently acted as a paid editor. Your comments at Articles for deletion/Lisa Tenner prompted this inquiry. You should also fill out and add connected contributor (paid) on the talk pages of those articles. Thank you. J bh Talk  02:11, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
 * I never edited Lisa Tenner in mainspace. I wrote the article in userspace, and an independent third party moved it to mainspace. Then I added a photo. You will see that my required disclosure is prominently listed at the top of my user page, and it has been there for years. All edits from this account can be considered paid edits, as I use a different account for my personal work. This disclosure/paid account system is outlined in the essay that is wikilinked to my disclosure and was developed with input from a member of the Wikimedia Foundation, a member of the Arbitration Committee, and a veteran administrator. I&#39;m Tony Ahn (talk) 03:05, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you, however the ToU now, and for a while has required the disclosure of individual clients ie who you are working for and on whose behalf the edits are being made. In the case of being hired by an individual to work on their page the two would be the same thing however if, for instance, you were hired by an intermediary firm to work on a subject's article both the subject and intermediary would need to be disclosed. It does not matter whether you work on the article in draft space, user space or, against WP:COI best practices in main space. (On a quick look I see you started John Lemp and edited Kenneth McPeek, United Laboratories and others in Main space without disclosure) The disclosures must be made and maintained. I understand it may be an annoyance to do so but the purpose of the WP:PAID disclosure rules are to allow other editors and interested readers to know what articles were created or "managed" by PR professionals without having to, for instance, go through your edit history.  Again, thank you for your forthright disclosure that you are a paid PR professional. Wikipedia's policies and the WMF's Terms of Use have however moved beyond that to requiring more detailed disclosure. As I see every indication that you are a good faith editor and forthright professional I look forward to your more detailed disclosures. If you disagree with or think I have misinterpreted the disclosure requirements please let me know.  J bh  Talk  12:15, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
 * An example of the use of paid and would be   while on the article talk page you, or someone working from your user page disclosures would use connected contributor (paid) with the same parameters disclosed by you on your user page.  J bh  Talk  12:44, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
 * All paid edits are for the article subject. I'll add that to my disclosure template. I&#39;m Tony Ahn (talk) 17:31, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

re: RS Guidelines
I fully agree that the guidelines need more clarifications. Do ping me when you start any discussion, and I'll be happy to contribute. --<sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 11:19, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

No More Reviews
Hi, while I'm generally sympathetic to PR practitioners who want to contribute to Wikipedia in a manner that respects rules and guidelines, I'm not going to be able to review any more of your work, at least not for a very long while. My objectivity is being challenged and soon they'll be calling me a meatpuppet or worse, so respectfully, ask other editors. And I recommend you spread it around so they don't end up with the same problem. Rotate your crops, so to speak. Cool? Wilipino (talk) 10:51, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
 * If you recall, we met because you answered a request for edit tag I put up. I generally go back to people who are willing to review my clients' articles, but okay, all good. I&#39;m Tony Ahn (talk) 14:17, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors September 2016 News
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:36, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gastric Mind Band (September 19)
<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gastric Mind Band and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Gastric_Mind_Band Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:David.moreno72&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Gastric_Mind_Band reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David. moreno 72   13:10, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors December 2016 News
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors February 2017 News
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:21, 20 February 2017 (UTC)