User talk:I.pinnell

Question on deleted draft
Hello! New to Wikipedia so sorry for the issue! I attempted to create a draft article for the Flourishing Business Canvas but it was marked as spam. I am part of a volunteer group of global first explorers who have been using the canvas, and wanted to make information on it more accessible to people on the internet as I think it is a useful and proven tool (and notable considering the number of journal articles on it and global community using it). I attempted to write it in the same style and layout as the Wikipedia article on the traditional Business Model Canvas to ensure it was neutral and informative. Any suggestions on why it was marked as spam (but the existing article on the related Business Model Canvas is fine) would be really helpful! I.pinnell (talk) 18:19, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi. I'm an administrator here on Wikipedia.  I took a look at your deleted draft, and I think I can point to a few things.  First, Wikipedians tend to be suspicious of adjectives.  Words like "popular" and "unique" are used to puff up something and make it sound more impressive.  That's expected in a press release, but it's inappropriate for an encyclopedia.  The phrase "enable more effective collaboration" is pretty much meaningless.  I guess you could say something is a "collaborative tool", but I never heard a real person say, "My new car enables more effective vehicular transportation."  Although, who knows, maybe PR guys talk like that to their friends.  What you want to do is describe a topic using slightly formal wording and stick to verifiable facts.  No flowery words, no buzzword bingo like "it enables innovation by proactively changing paradigms to encourage sustainability", etc.  Stuff like that will get your article tagged as promotional and possibly deleted.  If you're involved with the topic, you should also read our guideline on how to manage a conflict of interest. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 22:36, 8 June 2017 (UTC)


 * There are several problems here. Firstly, you're not just "part of a volunteer group"; WP:PAID is likely relevant to your position. Secondly, the draft's sources all fell into one of three categories: Sources that didn't mention the Flourishing Business Canvass (Ehrenfeld), sources that were authored or co-authored by people connected to the Flourishing Business Canvass, and ones that were not reliable (blogs and other websites without editorial oversight). If there is any independent coverage of the Flourishing Business Canvass, the draft didn't show it; instead it was a summary of all the nice things people associated with the project have written about it (plus some nice things that weren't actually confirmed by the sources, inependent or not). Huon (talk) 22:39, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, I.pinnell, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Flourishing Business Canvas, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! &mdash; O Fortuna   semper crescis, aut decrescis  17:14, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Flourishing Business Canvas


A tag has been placed on Draft:Flourishing Business Canvas, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. &mdash; O Fortuna   semper crescis, aut decrescis  17:14, 8 June 2017 (UTC)