User talk:I3onnie

March 2023
Hello, I'm Adakiko. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Matt King (politician) seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 08:07, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to DemocracyNZ. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.- gadfium 08:16, 30 March 2023 (UTC)


 * The party's ideology is literally freedom of choice. Calling it an "anti-vaccine mandate" party is like calling Labour a "Pro tax" party - it's not at all neutral I3onnie (talk) 08:25, 30 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia goes by what wp:reliable sources state. Those sources state "anti-vaccine". Adakiko (talk) 08:43, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Matt King is strongly against that message - at most he says the party is anti-mandate, but you wouldnt change any of the other parties to "Pro-mandate" - it's one of their policies, not their ideaology I3onnie (talk) 08:45, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
 * It does not matter one bit what Mr King thinks. The only thing that matters is how it’s presented in reliable secondary sources. And please have a read of Help:Minor edit; your use of the minor edit check box has thus far been 100 per cent incorrect.  Schwede  66  14:25, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
 * It absolutely matters what Mr King thinks...he's the leader of the party. A first source. How is it better to use secondary sources from media outlets which are known to use anything but neutral language?
 * I'm incredibly frustrated that this site is being used for people to push their political views, rather than as an educational resource.
 * As for minor edits "A minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute"
 * I whole-heartedly believed this when making these adjustments as what is currently written is a fallacy. I3onnie (talk) 18:08, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at DemocracyNZ, you may be blocked from editing. - gadfium 18:36, 30 March 2023 (UTC)