User talk:I6097063

Feedback on your article
Hello I6097063, Thank you for writing your article in your sandbox! I have read the article and would like to give some feedback to improve your article to Wikipedia standards and customs. While your tutor will judge it content wise, I will look if it meets the quality standards we have on Wikipedia. I standard look for a series of subjects that need improvement or are okay. I hope you can implement this feedback to your sandbox article before your final version. Thanks! Romaine (talk) 12:42, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Intro sentence: good! (But no need to write "Original" in the first sentence with a capital.)
 * Links: good! However, be more careful: in the first sentence the word "Dutch" is twice present, but each of them has a different meaning (language vs country). The one that is linked, is about the language, but links to the country: wrong!
 * Headers: To me the headers are somewhat confusing. Usually an article starts with the context, then followed by the contents, and then the reception. Instead you mix them up. The structure of an article is usually chronologically: context-contents-reception. Please re-structure you article accordingly.
 * References: A very good start, but every paragraph needs to end with a reference. Also, please be a bit more precise: add references after the dot.
 * Context/timeframe: In this section I expect to read about what has led to the existence of the book and the timeframe in what the book was written, not about the book itself. In other words: what came before the book. In the section "The author" the first to paragraphs are about the context, the 3rd one is about the reception (-> separate section please). The section of "Historical context" is to me a bit weird as there should only be one section in the article that is about the context.
 * How was the book received: Missing! This section I expect to read about how the book was received, what people thought of it, how it was used, awards for the book, what the author did after the book (as result of), etc. In other words: what came after the book?
 * Ready to publish: I am happy with your first attempt, but re-writing/re-structuring is needed.