User talk:I64s

Nomination for deletion of Template:Singapore in 2006
Template:Singapore in 2006 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 15:45, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:SGCOTF article header
Template:SGCOTF article header has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 05:56, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Singapore general election, 1997
Template:Singapore general election, 1997 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.  Zack mann  (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:31, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of East Coast Park Service Road


The article East Coast Park Service Road has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable road, fails GNG"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. R22-3877 (talk) 10:47, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of PageOne Communications


A tag has been placed on PageOne Communications, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Mean as custard (talk) 09:41, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.Deb (talk) 13:39, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

The WikiEagle - January 2022
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:37, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

April 2022
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain namespaces ((Article) and Draft) because of historical copyright violations in that area. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 22:05, 25 April 2022 (UTC) I have blocked you per the evidence provided in this CCI request. I realize you are no longer really editing, but if you want to be unblocked, you must commit to no longer copying from sources and demonstrate a better understanding of copyright. Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 22:07, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Icon Loft for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Icon Loft is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Icon Loft until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Darylgolden(talk) Ping when replying 12:45, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of One Raffles Link for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article One Raffles Link is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/One Raffles Link until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Darylgolden(talk) Ping when replying 04:49, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for merger of Template:Life in Singapore
Template:Life in Singapore has been nominated for merging with Template:Singapore topics. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:42, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

Terence's talk redirects to this page
Hi. I answered a query of yours at the Help Desk and in following up to see whether it had helped with your draft at User:Terence/sandbox, I tried to navigate to your Talk Page, only to find that the link redirects to this page for I64s. That seems a bit odd, since blocked I64s (above) in both article and draft namespaces. Can you explain what is going on? Strictly speaking, you haven't been editing in the spaces you were blocked in but the redirect here seems weird to me. Mike Turnbull (talk) 17:23, 20 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi Mike:
 * No I don't know whats going on either.
 * What did you mean when you said "Strictly speaking, you haven't been editing in the spaces . . . " That's very disturbing; I have been spending hours and hours doing what I though was editing. Terence (talk) 13:11, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
 * See above. In User_talk:I64s, an admin "blocked [I64s] indefinitely from editing certain namespaces ((Article) and Draft) because of historical copyright violations in that area". You, @Terence, as far as I can tell from your contributions since that date, have, except for one edit to 10 Downing Street on 7 July 2022, only edited Talk pages and your own sandbox, which would thus not be a blockevasion, even if you indeed have I64s as a second account. If I64s is not an account controlled by you, then I don't understand why you have chosen to link your signature so it ends up directing people here (via User_talk:Terence). Mike Turnbull (talk) 14:15, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
 * @Michael D. Turnbull: Hi, i64s and Terence are different accounts. User talk:Terence only links here because i64s was renamed from Terence to i64s. Terence appears registered before the rename because Terence was also renamed (in 2018) from User:Sir Cloudesley Shovel II to User:Terence. Hope this helps. ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me! 14:24, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks, @ARandomName123. So the way forward is for Terence to overwrite the current redirect at User_talk:Terence with some content (or blank that page) and from then on anyone who wants to contact them will be in the correct place.... Mike Turnbull (talk) 14:32, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Ok I am here at User talk: I64s. Now what do I do?
 * I still don't understand how all this happened. It's exhausting!  Terence (talk) 16:32, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
 * @Terence: Hi, I've removed the redirect and left a standard welcome message. Problem should now be resolved. ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me! 16:37, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks!! Terence (talk) 17:02, 21 February 2024 (UTC)