User talk:I64s/Archive 10

{| width=100% style="background:#F5FFFA; border:2px solid green;" |

This is an archive of my talk page. Please do NOT post any new messages here. Instead, post it at my main talk page. Thanks.

upload to wikicommons
yes please go ahead thanksChensiyuan 11:57, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

My RfA (reprise)
Well, it's been a week now that I've been an administrator and I'd like to take this moment to once again thank everyone who supported my RfA, and to let you all know that I don't think I've screwed anything up yet so I hope I'm living up to everyone's expectations for me. But if I ever fall short of those expectations, I'd certainly welcome folks telling me about it!

Atlant 14:12, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

A belated note - Gary Kirk's RfA


Requests for adminship/Elonka
Thank you very much for your support in my RfA. Unfortunately consensus was not reached, and the nomination was not successful. However, I do appreciate your participation, am still in support of the Wikipedia project, and will continue to contribute without interruption. Thanks again! --Elonka 16:30, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for supporting my RfA
Thank you for supporting my RfA that I have passed with 73/2/1.--Jusjih 09:30, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

RE:Meetup
Thank you for informing me about this. Currently, I cannot make any promises regarding this as I would most likely be working on these two days. However, I would let you know if my real world situation changes. Personally, if given the chance, I would indeed love to have a meet-up with you guys (and girls). -- S iva1979 Talk to me  16:13, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

WP:SG!
Just out of interest, am I still the youngest active SGpedian? -  SpLoT  / (talk) 06:40, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for October 30th.


You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:32, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

My Editor Review
Hi, I just started an editor review at Editor review/Jersey Devil and am trying to get feedback on my edits. Feel free to leave a review or comment. Thanks and bye.--Jersey Devil 01:59, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Request
Could you please not keep yourself logged in when you are away from your machine? Especially if you do end up becoming an admin leaving your account vulnerable could create major damage. JoshuaZ 06:12, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Thank you...
...for your support of my recent RfA. If I can ever be of any help with my fancy new buttons or if you just need a set of disinterested eyes to look at an article. BTW, I'm still waiting for more about Singapore hot dogs, even if they are nothing special, they still belong at hot dog variations :)  young  american  (ahoy hoy) 16:48, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Hi
Hello, Terence Ong. Can we be friends? Thank you. Ac s 4b 16:37, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

Sorry to interrupt but I hope that your wikistress will go down and soon be cured. Have a nice day! Ac s 4b 17:03, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Superior (proposed state)
Please see Vanderbilt University source and consider changing your vote. Articles for deletion/Superior (proposed state) MPS 18:30, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for November 6th.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:32, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

RfA thanks
 Thank you for participating in my RfA discussion! I appreciate you contributing your voice to the debate and its outcome. I hope how I wield the mop makes you proud. Thanks! &mdash; Saxifrage

Thanks
Hi Terence, even though we haven't interacted, I have seen you active at various forums... Thanks for your support to my recent RFA. Do let me know if I be of any assistance -- Lost (talk) 13:57, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
 * PS:My thanks note looks quite drab below all those swank notices but as I said in my RFA, I am technologically challenged...:) -- Lost (talk) 13:59, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Use of word "vanity" in AFD discussions
Just a friendly note regarding the use of "vanity" as a reason for deletion. (Articles for deletion/Joel Manning). Please instead use "conflict of interest" per the policy pronouncement at WP:COI. Cheers, Jpe|ob 00:22, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

RfA thanks
Hi Terence Ong, I am very thankful to you for supporting and comments on my succesful RfA. Shyam ( T / C ) 06:53, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for your input!
Thank you for taking part in my RfA. The RfA was not successful, mostly because I did a pretty bad job of presenting myself. I'll run again sometime in the next few months, in the hopes that some will reconsider.

In the meantime, one of the projects I'm working on is A Wikimedia Administrator's Handbook. This is a wikibook how-to guide intended to help new administrators learn the ropes, as well as to simply "demystify" what adminship entails. If you are an administrator, please help out with writing it, particularly on the technical aspects of the tools. Both administrators and non-administrators are welcome to help link in and sort all of the various policies regarding the use of these tools on wikipedia in particular (as well as other projects: for example, I have almost no experience with how things work on wiktionary or wikinews). Users who are neither familiar with policy or the sysop tools could be of great help by asking questions about anything that's unclear. The goal is to get everything together in one place, with a narrative form designed to anticipate the reader's next question.

A second project, related but not entailed, is a book on wikimedia in general, with a history of how various policies evolved over time, interesting trivia (e.g., what the heck was "wikimoney" about?), and a history of how the wikimedia foundation itself came about and the larger issues that occurred during its history (such as the infamous "Spanish Fork").

Again, thanks for your input on the RfA, and thanks in advance for any help you might be able to provide for the handbook. -- SB_Johnny |talk|books 14:37, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

RE:IM
Yes, I have a Messenger account; however, I'd also like to think that I have some form of a social life, and I'd rather not have Wikipedia invade my personal life as such. So I'm going to have to decline your request - but you could always drop me [mailto:ranathalion@gmail.com an email] if there are any pressing issues. Thanks! - ryan  d  17:51, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for November 13th.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:28, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

b-day
I know this is early but...


 * My happy birthdays here! --Ginkgo100 talk · e@ 05:02, 17 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Happy birthday! Enjoy your day! Jam 01 06:21, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Happy birthday!
I know we haven't known each other for long, but in that time you've been nothing but friendly, helpful and hardworking. Your passion hasn't gone unnoticed. On this special day, I'd like to wish this quintessential user a very happy birthday, and good luck for his *ahem* future wikiendeavours ;D -  SpLoT  / (talk) 10:06, 17 November 2006 (UTC) 

has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing! -  SpLoT  / (talk) 10:06, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Steveo2 11:57, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

HAPPY BIRTHDAY

 * Happy birthday Terence! I hope you have a good day, and that you enjoy your (big) cake. | A ndonic O  Talk 14:32, 17 November 2006 (UTC) [[Image:Birthday cake.jpg|500px]]

Hey Terence, a very Happy Birthday to you! Enjoy your day :D -- May the Force be with you! Shr e shth91 15:20, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
 * A bit late, but Happy Birthday nonetheless! &mdash;Goh wz 17:13, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

RfA thanks

 * And a belated happy birthday! M a rtinp23 14:35, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

afd for airline destinations
Someone renominated airline destinations for afd. Since you voted keep last time, I thought you might be interested. DB (talk) 20:07, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

You're Welcome

 * Oh, you are welcome. I wasn't expecting a thank you note, you are very kind. Thank you for your trouble. | A ndonic O  Talk 21:37, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

I also would like to thank you for your message. I really enjoy giving out nice things, and to get some thanks for it was really good. Best wishes, Jam 01 08:04, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Meetup and AfD
I reconfirm that I will not be coming on 24 November due to exams.

Regarding WCC, it houses government offices and shops. That's true. But I still fail to see its notability in the worldwide context. Kimchi.sg 04:21, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

I don't see any mention of a wet weather contingency plan on the meetup page. Better have one, because the afternoon weather has been completely predictable this week - rainy. Kimchi.sg 13:07, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Security of your account (or lack thereof)
Just when I thought this and this were the last edits you'd let your friends make while you were "away at lunch", just 5 days ago you made this edit which was a mix of good addition and sneaky vandalism. Apart from your subsequent edit summary, I had no way of telling whether it was really you who made that edit.

Please, please, please, get into the habit of locking your computer whenever you leave it untouched, even if you are going away for just one minute. You can lock your computer in less than one second by pressing Windows Key + L. If I see you making another edit which appears to be even slightly vandalistic I may have no choice but to block your account indefinitely, the same treatment as given to those who disclose their passwords on their user pages or otherwise compromise the security of their accounts. Regards, Kimchi.sg 04:27, 20 November 2006 (UTC)


 * What a lousy threat! I really hate it when contributors are treated in this manner. The threat of ban is totally unwarranted; those edits were just pranks on the user's namespace, probably by his friends. To threaten with an indefinite ban is ridiculous and abusive. --Vsion 07:44, 20 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Terence, I suggest you lock your computer while you are away. You cannot afford to leave your account open for other people to commit vandalism with. However, Kimchi – I would suggest that you tone down that warning. Indef-block makes it sound like an abuse. &mdash; Nearly Headless Nick  {L} 12:35, 20 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Struck out. Kimchi.sg 08:55, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for November 20th.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:51, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

forgot
oh yeah, you told me before. shall do so from now on. would take of the backlog. thanks. Chensiyuan 07:07, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Opus Dei RFC
In answer to your question on the AFD discussion, yes, Opus Dei members seem to actively be inserting propagandistic/"brochure" style material into Wikipedia. There are 5-6 single-purpose accounts who have hundreds of edits, but not a single one unrelated to Opus Dei. There's been a history of puppetry on Opus Dei topics-- for example, when the Opus Dei article was trying to be nominated as a FAC, there were 3-4 users who "suddenly showed up" and voted for Opus Dei as their first or second edit.

There's actually been a big edit war going on with regard to that today. After lots of NPOV problems, I have recently done a major rewrite on the Opus Dei article-- but it's been getting reverted by the OD promoters and driving me bonkers! lol. I'm now requesting comments on the talk page. Could you look over the page and comment on whether the rewrite is an improvment and maybe help out in the ensuing discussion? --Alecmconroy 14:04, 27 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks so much for you help out lately on that.  It seems like there's a pretty strong consensus that the rewrite is an improvement (11 our of 11 outside views), so, hopefully that's settled.  There's a slightly different debate ongoing right now about whether or not the improvement introduced NPOV problem.  If you have a second, could you look it over and offer your opinion on whether that's the case?  --Alecmconroy 15:30, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Associated-Rediffusion
is an interesting addition, the article being about the UK television station (1955-1968) that mentions, in passing, Overseas Rediffusion.

I'd agree that O-R needs an article to itself (a sad lack of sources last time I tried) but putting the SGpedian's template on the existing article seems a bit, well, wrong, on so many levels.

In my opinion only. Your mileage may differ :o) ➨  ЯEDVERS  19:47, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for your support
I wasn't going to send thank-you cards, but the emotional impact of hitting WP:100 (and doing so unanimously!) changed my mind. So I appreciate your confidence in me at RFA, and hope you'll let me know if I can do anything for you in the future. Cheers! -- nae'blis 23:35, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for November 27th.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 02:00, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Image:Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh cropped.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh cropped.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Oden 09:30, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

RfA thanks
Thank you for voting in my RfA, I passed. I appreciate your input. Please keep an eye on me(if you want) to see if a screw up. HighInBC (Need help? Ask me) 16:06, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Kaya toast
has been tagged for deletion. care to voice your views on the talk page? thanks. Chensiyuan 17:09, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Congratulations!



 * On my method of working this out: When I noticed that the statistics were showing over 1,000,000 media files, I refreshed both the stats page and the "recent uploads" page simultaneously, counting back the dozen or so files to find yours there (so, say it was showing 1,000,023 files, I checked the 24th from the top). I did this multiple times, and yours came out each time. Therefore, it's very likely that yours was it. :) Daveydw ee b ( chat/review! ) 11:11, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Haha! Congrats on your one minute of fame! &mdash;Goh wz 12:30, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Let our meeting time be constant
On 30 November 2006 at 4.36 pm (SST), you changed the meeting time on Meetup/Singapore 3 such that it was brought forward by half an hour to 11.30 am. I had some thoughts on the change; please visit the meetup's talk page. Thanks. &mdash;Goh wz 13:51, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

RfA: Khukri
Just a quick note to say thanks for your support on my recent RfA. It became clear very quickly that my editing background was going to detrimental to my nomination. Having seen other recent RfA's fail once one or two admins opposed and others just piled on the vote, I decided it would save the ignominy if I withdrew my nomination. I don't intend to change the work I do as it's what I enjoy, so it'll be unlikely I'll apply again. Anyway thanks again for taking the time to review my nomination and giving your support. Regards Khukri ( talk  .  contribs ) 11:45, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Singapore Airlines fleet
Please do not change the Singapore Airlines page. It is in the correct format and the way the other people who changed it had it layouted was incorrect! We are trying to compromise which fleet table we want to use for Wikipedia and so far, this is the most popular table, which is why I created it for Singapore Airlines. The way it was was also hard to read!--Golich17 17:30, 2 December 2006 (UTC)