User talk:IAC-62

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Ivor Novello
Hi. I understand your edit about Novello's birth name, and you are certainly correct, but it is clearer to refer to him as Novello throughout. It is crystal clear that, as a child, he must have performed under his birth name. The references to the book are very helpful. Obviously, the Novello article could use considerable expansion, so if you have the resources, feel free to go ahead and fill out his biography. For a good example of a more complete biography, see Noel Coward. All the best, -- Ssilvers (talk) 00:09, 11 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the new info. One minor technical thought: the reference goes after the punctuation, like this: Novello was nine feet tall.  There are some rather surprising things in the WP:Manual of Style, so look thru the MOS when you have a moment.  Of course, for a british person like Novello, spelling, etc. should be UK spelling (unless it's in a quote).  Question for you: You wrote: "For the UK tax year 1943-44, Novello had paid £19,948 income tax from his £35,400 earnings".  What does this have to do with the imprisonment, or anything else?  Happy editing!  -- Ssilvers (talk) 19:29, 12 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Hi. The amount of income tax paid by Ivor Novello demonstrates that he was not a parasite on the war economy, which was the implication in a fuel rationing offence. IAC-62 (talk) 23:37, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

WILLIAM KERMODE/ MARCH 2010 Thank you IAC-62 for your assistance in formalising my additions to your origianl entry. I originally compiled the info in 2008. I will try to submit a photo image of his work if I can Giddy-Whelk (talk) 12:42, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Suma beach pre-war.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Suma beach pre-war.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:28, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

RfC at Robert E. Lee
As a recent contributor to Talk:Robert E. Lee, you are receiving this notice for an RfC at of a proposed restatement of a wp:primary source which contains more points than the existing block quote from the letter. The primary source is a 1856 letter of Lee’s to his wife from Texas as found at Alexander Long, Memoirs of Robert E. Lee: his military and personal history (1886), p. 82-83. Opponents have seen wp:original research in the proposal as drawing conclusions not found in the primary source. A rewrite of the first proposal follows an edit break. TheVirginiaHistorian (talk) 08:59, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Battle of the Beaufort (1982)
I'm sorry, I don't understand what this means: "Mordechai Goldman... invalided out of the army after being wounded".

Could you clarify it? Jokkmokks-Goran (talk) 00:56, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

The article says he was wounded by Syrian artillery outside Beirut, after the Beaufort action, and later invalided out as unfit for army service. IAC-62 (talk) 17:15, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

A very old edit
Hi, I see you're looking back to see what I did many months ago; I hope you're not taking my (quite gentle) comment too hard. I guess you've noted that I made many edits, and that the article went from the jaws of deletion to properly-structured, fully-cited, and distinctly more defensible. Actually there was a full-blown deletionist campaign against the entire project, and hundreds of articles vanished for ever. I brought at least 50 articles from AfD-ready to GA in the course of six months, removing a large amount of fan-material and original research, and adding whole new sections of scholarly analysis with many hundreds of citations. A whole shelf of learned books. I'm afraid that if in the midst of such an event, one uncited but actually verifiable claim gets the chop, it's hardly surprising. Nice that we now have the leisure to chat about single edits in detail. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 18:23, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

I prefer the nazgul article as it was. It is now too long and much of it retelling the story. I don't much like many of the Tolkien experts who make careers out of the books, and the ideas of such are now presented as authoritative. Your own editing style is at times dismissive and even somewhat arrogant, as with your deletion of Gaelic nazc as 'nonsense'. Tolkien was aware of nazc and ghoul, as he said in the work I quoted. He appeared to dislike it, as he hadn't consciously intended it. The possible, just, Gaelic derivation of admiral, as compared to the arabic standard was also dismissed; years ago, haven't been back to look.IAC-62 (talk) 19:11, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)