User talk:IAmBecomeDeath/Archive 1

Your draft article, Draft:Rituals


Hello, IAmBecomeDeath. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Rituals".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13. An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Rankersbo (talk) 14:00, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Phillip W. Berman concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Phillip W. Berman, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Phillip W. Berman


Hello, IAmBecomeDeath. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Phillip W. Berman".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the  or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Cahk (talk) 20:11, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bird & Bottle Inn has been accepted
 Bird & Bottle Inn, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! SwisterTwister  talk  23:30, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Your edit to Julian Assange is disputed
I've started a discussion at Talk:Julian_Assange. NadVolum (talk) 20:25, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Divas Nightclub & Bar has been accepted
 Divas Nightclub & Bar, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Divas_Nightclub_%26_Bar help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Bkissin (talk) 18:48, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:The Electric State (Graphic Novel)


A tag has been placed on Wikipedia:The Electric State (Graphic Novel) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

"Invalid namespace"

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ~ Eejit43 ( talk ) 03:42, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

The Electric State (Graphic Novel) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, The Electric State (Graphic Novel), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~ Eejit43 ( talk ) 03:46, 19 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Hello, IAmBecomeDeath,
 * Please stop moving your article around to different namespaces and page titles. Page moves should only be done when necessarily. Please think them through so that you don't need to do subsequent moves to correct for mistakes.
 * If you have questions about editing on Wikipedia or its policies, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 06:29, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
 * I find it a tad disconcerting that you passionately responded a post I placed on Talk:Administrators about admin accountability, a subject about which you suggest that ARBCOM has been too strict, and then six minutes later you appear to have gone to my profile and posted on the talk page about a totally unrelated matter, that you were not involved in. First, and foremost, I find it unfortunate that anyone would be opposed to holding people in positions of responsibility accountable, or to find problematic the incorporation of due process.
 * You state: "We aren't licensed, we are all unpaid volunteers who spend time doing what we feel called to do, and 99.99% (including you) are anonymous." I am sure your passion is compelling. But, it is of no moment. In any case, if this is a method of legitimizing the contributions of some more than others, I'm not sure that is really in the spirit of the project.  Anonymous users have been on wikipedia forever.  I am certainly happy to identify myself to WikipediA users if I thought it would serve some purpose, other than allowing those with bad intentions to conduct harassment campaigns.
 * There is a documented history of Wikipedia political bias, bullying, and viewpoint discrimination. One need only point to the situation involving the gamergate controversy, particularly the abuse of user "Devil's Advocate" to see abusive admins and editors.  (See "Towards Better Visual Tools for Exploring Wikipedia Article Development — The Use Case of "Gamergate Controversy" - https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/ICWSM/article/view/14701.)
 * See also:
 * Liu, Geoffrey: Why I really hate Wikipedia administrators (August 26, 2009)
 * Lawrie, James: Corrupt Wikipedia Admin Quits After Almost a Decade of Data Protection Breaches Across Multiple Jurisdictions (February 25, 2021)
 * Administrator abuse on Wikipedia (http://wikibin.org/articles/administrator-abuse-on-wikipedia.html)
 * Paling, Emma: Wikipedia's Hostility to Women (The Atlantic, OCTOBER 21, 2015)
 * Martin, Brian: Persistent bias on Wikipedia: methods and responses.  Social Science Computer Review, Vol. 36, No. 3, June 2018, pp. 379-388; doi: 10.1177/0894439317715434
 * Farjoo, Manhad: Is Wikipedia a Victim of Its Own Success? (Time, Sept. 28, 2009):  "In Wikipedia's early days, every new addition to the site had a roughly equal chance of surviving editors' scrutiny. Over time, though, a class system emerged; now revisions made by infrequent contributors are much likelier to be undone by élite Wikipedians. Chi also notes the rise of wiki-lawyering: for your edits to stick, you've got to learn to cite the complex laws of Wikipedia in arguments with other editors. Together, these changes have created a community not very hospitable to newcomers."
 * Cordially,
 * IAmBecomeDeath (talk) 00:11, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics
– bradv  14:07, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Electric State (graphic novel) has been accepted
 The Electric State (graphic novel), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=The_Electric_State_(graphic_novel) help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! BuySomeApples (talk) 17:37, 22 July 2023 (UTC)