User talk:IAmTheNeil

Your submission at Articles for creation: DaVinci Resolve has been accepted
 DaVinci Resolve, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Robert McClenon (talk) 05:55, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=DaVinci_Resolve help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Affinity Publisher has been accepted
 Affinity Publisher, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Jovanmilic97 (talk) 20:01, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Affinity_Publisher help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Hawklords
There is little point in having the Hawklords page redirect to Hawklords (1978). Simply move Hawklords (1978) the Hawklords as the primary topic, with its hatnote for Hawklords (2008). This will help with searches and fixes all of the original links, which are currently being re-routed through the redirect. 109.149.245.88 (talk) 15:05, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for the suggestion. Done. IAmTheNeil (talk) 15:38, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Mind the insults
"Fixing those lazily added, improper new citations." Bare URLs are perfectly fine to quickly source content that needs sourcing. While filling out the citation is important for linkrot, it's not critical over meeting WP:V. This is a collaboration, after all. -- ferret (talk) 14:57, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Fair play. Thanks for the info. Meeting standards is certainly what I’ve come to know from your edits. IAmTheNeil (talk) 16:34, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:DaVinci Resolve Logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:DaVinci Resolve Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:34, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Profound Mysteries, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andreas Nilsson. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

A detail in Profound Mysteries
Hi! There's a rather minor detail which still puzzles me. Asking you because you seem to be the user who added the text. In the development section we retell Goldfrapp' impressions of working with Röyksopp. The original text says: "and it was a fascinating joy creating "Impossible" together". The article paraphrasing stated that he described the creation process as a fascinating joy. I felt like this wording was quite inaccurate when taken out of context, so the better variant would be "the creative process". Please advise whether my guess is correct (English is my second language) and whether the meaning of the original statement is correctly paraphrased in this way, or it should still be "the creation process". Many thanks, --Ur frnd (talk) 22:04, 3 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Thank you for the suggestion! I think there's a small concern that "the creative process" could be taken to mean something more abstract than the creation of the album itself, but I agree that the previous phrasing wasn't ideal either; therefore, I've adjusted it to borrow a little more heavily from the original quote, to avoid misconception. Hopefully this will solve it :) IAmTheNeil (talk) 23:19, 3 May 2022 (UTC)


 * I agree with all your arguments. Seems unlikely that she had the creative process itself in mind. So the adjustment you have made, although it contains more direct citations, will certainly not distort the meaning. Thanks for the help! --Ur frnd (talk) 09:49, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Affinity Publisher Logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Affinity Publisher Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:03, 6 July 2024 (UTC)