User talk:IC89

Important Notice
Doug Weller talk 20:40, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
 * Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
 * Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
 * Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
 * No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
 * If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to [ do so].
 * Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
 * Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! —  Newslinger  talk   05:29, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

March 2021
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Project Veritas, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. —  Newslinger  talk   02:32, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

I did make a reason in the summary. It was four or five sentences long IC89 (talk) 05:07, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Your edit at Special:Diff/1013894478 was unconstructive because it deleted reliably sourced content against the consensus on the talk page. The edit summary did not contain a valid interpretation of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Feel free to continue the talk page discussion at . —  Newslinger  talk   10:57, 24 March 2021 (UTC)