User talk:ICICLE65

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome! Ironholds (talk) 22:21, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion of User:ICICLE65
A tag has been placed on User:ICICLE65, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ironholds (talk) 22:21, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts
Kira Chinmoku 21:04, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

I have e-mailed the admin below for support, yet my account is to be deleted ! So frustrating :-( — Preceding unsigned comment added by ICICLE65 (talk • contribs) 21:45, 8 October 2013 (UTC)


 * The main concern being expressed here is that what you have written so far about the SOUNDSTORM band seems to be purely promotional / advertising material and doesn't appear to meet our criteria for notability. Notability requires significant coverage of the subject by multiple reliable sources that are independent of the subject.  For example, news stories about the band that aren't simply reprints of press releases, published by reliable mainstream newspapers, could be used to establish notability.  However, a reference to the band's own web site is not useful for establishing notability, since it is not something independent of the subject.  Also, blog or forum postings, reader comments on newspaper stories, etc. would not be considered "reliable sources" and cannot be used on Wikipedia.


 * The other problem is that your original user names (SOUNDSTORM2007 and SOUNDSTORMER) appear to be connected specifically and exclusively to the SOUNDSTORM band — suggesting either that those accounts were being used as "group" accounts for the band (not allowed here, since accounts are supposed to be used by individuals), and/or that the accounts were being used solely to write promotional / advertising material for the band. You might not have realized it at the time, but by repeatedly reinstating your material despite other people's objections, you were casting yourself in the mould of a disruptive, contentious edit warrior — a kind of behaviour which is not tolerated here.  Apologies if you weren't trying to be disruptive and were simply confused as to why material you thought was valid was being brusquely tossed in the dustbin with what seemed to you to be cryptic dismissals.


 * If you can present some solid new sources about SOUNDSTORM which validate its notability, it might be possible to include an article about the band here on Wikipedia. But we're going to need to see much more about the band than you have offered so far.  —  Rich wales (no relation to Jimbo) 06:31, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi All, Thanks so much for the feedback. The idea was to set up the page first and then build it up with notable references, links etc etc. I do honestly apologise for the inconvenience I have caused and realize that I need to build it up before "loading" to Wikipedia. I am a million miles from being an "edit warrior", and I'm sorry for giving you that impression as I can see why you did, very well, have that impression. Re: Multiple accounts, again, down to my naivety, please, can you delete these accounts as I couldn't now? You have my complete backing to wipe this whole thing away. I will go away and re-write and try to educate myself on Wiki t & c's before I consider loading up again.

All the best guys. appreciate all the feedback

Regards,

ICICLE65 It's a