User talk:IEatpeople4Fun

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Vsmith (talk) 12:42, 14 May 2017 (UTC)


 * And, what articles do you intend to constructively edit / what are the first 3 edits you plan to make? Also, I'm not sure your username meets our username policy. SQL Query me!  03:41, 21 May 2017 (UTC)


 * I am willing to consider unblocking you, but it will make it clearer whether that would be a good idea if you can respond to the following points. (I also don't understand what is considered offensive about your user name. It looks to me no more offensive than many other joky user names.)


 * 1)  It would be helpful if you could make it clear that you now understand that posting "jokes" in serious Wikipedia articles is inappropriate, and that you won't do it again. (That applies both to funny jokes and to pathetically weak jokes that are unlikely to amuse anyone with a mental age above about 14. If you really honestly think that the childish edit that you made "would cause laughter in most people with a sense of humor" then your image of the level of maturity of "most people" is rather low.)
 * 2) Your second suggested edit has some merit, but the other two look to me like mere rephrasings of the same information. Can you explain why you think your changes would be improvements? The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 10:02, 29 May 2017 (UTC)


 * I read this appeal earlier, but I won't review it myself and will leave it to the good JamesBWatson (who I'd say is more forgiving than I am). My big concern is that your apparent interest in female genitalia, farting and erections is really not a million miles from juvenile trolling, and I can't help wondering if we should require you to follow the WP:Standard Offer and hopefully gain a little more maturity before being allowed back. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:30, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

@JamesBWatson Thank you for agreeing with me on my username. And I would like to make it clear that I now understand that the joke I posted earlier on the wikipedia article was gross and inappropriate. And that people use wikipedia for many things and I could have affected them negatively with my childish joke and I will not do it again. And I would like to say that the rephrasing I suggested on the article "Fart (word)" and "Morning wood" were what I believe to be easier to understand, make more sense and allows the reader to have a less advanced vocabulary to be able to fully understand the article.

@Just Chilling Stop engaging yourself in my unblocking process please. My username is no worse than most jokey usernames. If my username is unacceptable and is the reason for my blocking than I would like to report you for abusing your adminship as your username is no worse than mine.
 * If it is the case that there are other usernames also suggesting illegal activities then perhaps we should look at our username policy? Just Chilling (talk) 00:12, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

@Just Chilling In fact I have looked at the username policy before and can therefore state that there is nothing wrong/offensive about my username. If you disagree please point it out to me.

I won't review this request as I have already done so, but given that it does not address any of the concerns raised above, and only emphasises my concern that you are not mature enough to edit this encyclopaedia, I think it almost certain that it will be declined, and that you run the risk of having your ability to edit this page revoked. I strongly suggest you withdraw it and reconsider all the advice given above (including WP:Standard offer) if you wish to be allowed to edit at some point in the future. Optimist on the run (talk) 05:27, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

@Optimist on the run You can't block me for being immature. The slogan of wikipedia is "Anyone can edit" not "Only mature people with no sense of humor can edit". And as I have stated in the request for unblock I am enthusiastic about morning wood and farts and I would like to improve upon their articles so I don't see any valid reason to remain blocked.

. --UTRSBot (talk) 04:56, 9 January 2018 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 06:00, 4 February 2018 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 17:47, 4 February 2018 (UTC)