User talk:IExistToHelp/Archive 3

April 2017
Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus, as you did to Hetkhamar. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains under way. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 22:38, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for lying about making mistakes, pretending someone else was using your computer, wasting people's time. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Floquenbeam (talk) 15:21, 18 April 2017 (UTC) You apparently think we're idiots, and you can blame your mistakes on someone who wandered by your unattended computer to do the same kind of thing that you admit to doing yourself 5 minutes previously. You are wasting people's time, and the benefit to the project of having you help out does not outweigh the cost. I'd suggest at a minimum no one unblock this account until they've admitted to the lying, and agreed to stay away from NPP for 3-6 months. At a minimum. Personally, I would not unblock you until you've matured 3-4 years. --Floquenbeam (talk) 15:24, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Does this mean I should contact you after six months? It's IExistToHelp   talk  23:36, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
 * You should make an appeal after 6 months. PhilKnight (talk) 23:37, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

So in October is what you're saying. It's IExistToHelp   talk  23:38, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes. PhilKnight (talk) 23:39, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Info for future admin reviewers
This user was still pretending to be someone else in an autoblock unblock request 20 minutes before this last unblock request here. --Floquenbeam (talk) 00:22, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
 * User talk:ClasherofRoyales
 * User talk:WangViolin

Now, you're just blaming me for everything that happens at this IP address. It doesn't mean that I created the two accounts above that I am them. It's IExistToHelp   talk  22:58, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of One Paseo


A tag has been placed on One Paseo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Blueclaw (talk) 01:28, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

One Paseo moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, One Paseo, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 08:12, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Potato Chip Rock
Hello, IExistToHelp. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Potato Chip Rock, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:


 * 1) edit the page
 * 2) remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Salimfadhley (talk) 22:59, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Stanley M. Burstein
Hello, IExistToHelp,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Stanley M. Burstein should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Stanley M. Burstein.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Salimfadhley (talk) 22:52, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Jasmine Stiles for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jasmine Stiles is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jasmine Stiles until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Salimfadhley (talk) 23:12, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Mentorship
Your 6 months is almost up (in 12 days it will be) so I feel like I should put forward an offer of mentorship. If you can demonstrate your incident won't happen again then an admin might consider to unblock you, possibly with restrictions.  J 947 ( c ) (m)   21:47, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Draft:One Paseo concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:One Paseo, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:One Paseo


Hello, IExistToHelp. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "One Paseo".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 12:02, 5 February 2018 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 00:24, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Don't create sockpuppet accounts to evade your block (User:Weekssonia). Don't ping me from the sockpuppet account for no reason, I'm not going to turn a blind eye to it. When it has been a year since your original block (18 April), I'll restore your ability to edit your talk page to request an unblock. You should really study WP:Guide to appealing blocks between now and then, so you can make your best case, as we won't be responding to multiple inadequate unblock requests again. --Floquenbeam (talk) 15:26, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
 * As you've created another sock, you will need to wait 6 months to appeal. When you have done that, you may communicate with the community via WP:UTRS, as you seem to already know, given the UTRS banner above. TonyBallioni (talk) 01:00, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Category:Animals of Central America has been nominated for discussion
Category:Animals of Central America, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor(talk) 06:02, 27 August 2018 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 04:28, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

I Sincerely Apologize
I sincerely apologize for my past actions on Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons. I swear that I will misbehave anymore or create any more accounts. Also, most of my new accounts were not used abusively, I have seen that having multiple accounts is okay. Yet, a majority were only blocked for being my accounts not because I used them abusively, which I didn't(I didn't pull off a User:INeverCry and create the accounts to help me get admin).

Thank you-- It's IExistToHelp   talk  03:56, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Please list all accounts that you’ve previously used. Given your responses in UTRS, I’m not convinced this should be lifted. TonyBallioni (talk) 04:00, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
 * My pleasure. All the accounts listed here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Wikipedia_sockpuppets_of_IExistToHelp and Kong of Lasers. I created HolidayOk as well, but didn't really use it. Concerning the edits for my other accounts, here you go: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/AmphiEditor, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Blitzbop, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Calihio, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Nylonempty, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/OrwellFan, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Weekssonia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/WhyHistory. My brother used Kong of Lasers to upload his pictures on Wikimedia Commons. -- It's IExistToHelp   talk  04:13, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Thank you for acknowledging these. I have no other comments, but did want to ask about them given the UTRS. TonyBallioni (talk) 04:17, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Honestly, to me, looking through CU and the history, it appears you haven't given us the full list. That and your still editing logged out, evading your ban, even when it's only a single edit. And that was just two days ago. -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 05:37, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
 * , It was an outdated fact about Canyon Crest Academy. I mean, if you would prefer incorrect information over me fixing it, go ahead. I go to Canyon Crest Academy and I saw that the Canyon Crest Academy page was outdated. So I fixed it using the facts they(my principal) gave me. If you think that the facts I fixed were incorrect, you can email the principal since that is where the facts came from and ask him to look at the page. Plus, if I were evading my ban, I could just literally edit on any device that I didn't use Wikipedia on instead of this one. I can go to my friend's house(he lives near me) and edit as well. But I didn't.-- It's IExistToHelp   talk  17:16, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
 * We would rather you stop violating WP:SOCK and WP:EVADE. If that means leaving incorrect information in place for a little while until another editor comes along to correct it, that's fine. --Yamla (talk) 17:36, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

So I can't even fix outdated info anymore just cuz I'm blocked?
I haven't made a new account in a while. Also, I wasn't trying to evade my block. That was not my intention at all! I'm not a super psychologist so how am I supposed to convince anyone whose first instinct is to not believe me? You made this extremely unfair against me, I have already stopped making new accounts and using any other account besides this and Kong of Lasers(because I keep on getting emails from Wikimedia Commons). As for evading, I have literally put I am IExistToHelp on all my userpages and talk pages. -- It's IExistToHelp   talk  18:27, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
 * You can convince people by not violating WP:EVADE. Starting now. --Yamla (talk) 11:57, 16 September 2018 (UTC)


 * IExistToHelp, you seem to misunderstand what "evade" means. You evade your block every time you edit a Wikipedia article or talk page, any Wikipedia page at all except for this user talk page, as long as you are blocked. It has nothing to do with whether you are upfront about your block evasion or not. It has nothing to do with whether your edits are constructive or not. Obviously, if you start trolling or vandalising or creating socks for the sake of deception, that would also be unacceptable, but not because it would be more evading than what you have been doing now. It looks like you didn't know that, but now you do, so re-read the decline reason above and please follow the recommendations there. --bonadea contributions talk 13:19, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Can you please block my ip addresses for a year thank you. -- It's IExistToHelp   talk  22:59, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
 * I don't know your IP addresses. --Yamla (talk) 12:14, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Ok, then.-- It's IExistToHelp   talk  00:18, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Hi everyone-- It's IExistToHelp   talk  03:13, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi SQL Query me!  03:34, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

TPA
By now you know the drill: since you’re just using your talk page to mess around and abuse the unblock process, I’ve revoked your ability to use it. You can appeal using WP:UTRS. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:10, 26 September 2018 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 02:15, 26 September 2018 (UTC)