User talk:IFBScholar

Jack Schaap
The article:
 * Did not explain the notability of the person. Being the head of a minor college somewhere and have written some books is no reason for notoriety per se, otherwise we should have a biography on any academic in any country in the world who is head of a department in a university, and Wikipedia is not a directory. Per WP:BIO we should have biographies only on notable people.
 * This is especially true that this college is unaccredited and its faculty seems to be drawn from the same place.
 * The references seem to be drawn from that college's page and publications, rather than from independent sources. This violates WP:REF.
 * The only independent reference is a press article about some anecdote. I don't think that it is significant for the head of a college to have been mentioned in the press because some of his students committed a crime, unless there's evidence that the crime implicated the college or something like that.
 * Per WP:BLP, we should be especially picky when we do biographies of living people. This biography has basically no independent sources, whereas independent sources can be found for notable people.
 * Finally, we got a complaint on OTRS that the biography was defamatory. David.Monniaux 09:49, 20 January 2007 (UTC)