User talk:ILgdl18/sandbox

Looks like you've got the rubric structure down, and that it's coming along well. Add more information as you find it, and it'll be good to go. Interesting choice in disease by the way! --OliviaRas92 (talk) 18:05, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for your feed back! I added a recent research section when I found an article talking about preventative treatment. --ILgdl18 (talk) 07:25, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

Overall I think it looks good, might try to add a little more to some of the sections (if able) and I would read over it again for punctuation errors (Ex: Forgot a period in the second to last sentence in the abstract). I also would like to make a suggestion. You have a couple areas where you have abbreviations, like "A.E." or "UVA". I think it would be a good idea to identify what those abbreviations mean the first time you mention them, after that just use the abbreviations. Hope that helps. --Svela01 (talk) 01:58, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for looking over my work. I added a prognosis, epidemiology and recent research part. I had a hard time finding information for this topic as it is uncommon and this type of skin lesion is not researched as much as the umbrella termd polymorphous light eruption. --ILgdl18 (talk) 07:25, 12 December 2019 (UTC) --Sweiner02 (talk) 16:31, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Has some formatting issues. Compare to other pages.
 * Needs thorough and detailed linking to other wikipedia articles.
 * Needs some editing for grammar and clarity.
 * You keep using "said to" this adds nothing. Remove all uses.
 * Needs in text citations! Look at other wikipedia articles to see the level of citation required. Must use the wikipedia citation tool. Do not list separately. Let wikipedia make your list.
 * Do not abbreviate your disease. It's confusing.
 * Diagnosis needs more info.
 * Missing prognosis, epidemiology, and recent research.

Thank your feed back. I was not able to add much more to the diagnosis section because the diagnosis of acne aestivalis is visual and does not require extensive testing. The diagnosis requires a patient history testimony and an exam of the skin. The font is different but as we saw during office hours it is unknown why the font is different. I think that is out of my control.

--ILgdl18 (talk) 07:25, 12 December 2019 (UTC)