User talk:ILovetoEditWikis

File:MonicaRodriguez.jpeg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:MonicaRodriguez.jpeg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 01:07, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:MonicaRodriguez.jpeg


A tag has been placed on File:MonicaRodriguez.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – Train2104 (t • c) 13:10, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

April 2020
Hello, I'm Wallyfromdilbert. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Thom Tillis, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''Content such as "support free trade agreements" or "opposes gun control" are not very helpful to add to articles about politicians. Context and nuance is important, which is why reliable independent sources should be used to verify content and help decide what to include and how to phrase it. Thank you.'' – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 22:44, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Unsourced editorializing
Please do not add statements such as "Tillis opposes net neutrality" when that is your own opinion and not supported by the source you are citing. The article you cited only talks about one bill to repeal certain FCC regulations, while also talking about a potential compromise that was never reached, but does not talk about opposition to all net neutrality principles or rules. As I explained to you above, nuance and context is essential to accurate content in BLPs, rather than broad statements that are not based on actual reliable sources. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 17:26, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

Reply: Tillis is the co-sponsor of the Restoring Internet Freedom Act, a bill to nullify the Federal Communications Commission’s Open Internet Order. That's literally the bill to overturn Net Neutrality as reported by multiple sources. Tillis also explicitly says in this letter to a constituent that he "supports Chairman Pai's desire to overturn these mandates. . Respectfully, I don't believe this is editorializing at all but rather stating a fact about the Senator's stated position on the issue. ILovetoEditWikis (talk) 22:42, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

Reliable secondary sources
Your edits must cite reliable secondary sources, such as newspaper coverage. If you cite primary sources, as you did here, the edits will very likely be removed. Thus, if you want your content to survive in the long-term and if you want to avoid the hard work being wasted, you need to cite newspaper coverage. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 21:06, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)