User talk:ILuvBMW

March 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Juju has been reverted.

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \bblog(?:cu|fa|harbor|mybrain|post|savy|spot|townhall)?\.com\b (links: http://moderntribalist.blogspot.com/2005/05/gangs-use-voodoo-in-nigeria-sex-trade.html). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).

If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 18:04, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Blogs as sources
Your additions to the article juju are being removed because blogs are not not generally accepted as "reliable sources" according to Wikipedia policy. See WP:RELY. cheers Deconstructhis (talk) 18:54, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Again, please review the details of WP:RELY before adding material to the encyclopedia. The most recent material you've added to Wikipedia appears to be sourced from a website that does not meet the "reliability" standards required in the encyclopedia's policy. This is nothing personal, many people assume that simply because they're able to find something online that appears to be simply related to a point they're trying to make, that any source is appropriate, that is a mistaken assumption. The quality of the sources utilized in Wikipedia are an important part of maintaining the credibility that the project hopes to maintain. Before replacing the material in the article again, please take the time to read in detail the policy that I pointed out above and perhaps discuss it on the articles talk page first. I'd be happy to make some suggestions regarding possible alternative reliable sources for you. Also it's good to keep in mind that "[t]he source cited must clearly support the information as it is presented in the article" (again from WP:V). I'm sure that you're just as interested as every one else in making sure that our encyclopedia is properly sourced and reliable. happy editing. cheers Deconstructhis (talk) 20:01, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Deconstructhis (talk) 16:12, 21 March 2009 (UTC)