User talk:ILuvMad

January 2024
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Jaap Marais, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. ''You are introducing spelling and other mistakes at a rapid rate. Please stop.'' Greenman (talk) 18:22, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

I see that most of your edits have the edit summary "spelling mistakes", but in fact scarcely any of them do correct spellings. Some of the edits have replaced correct spellings with incorrect ones; some have gratuitously added capitalisation to words which are not proper nouns (without changing the spellings at all); some have introduced incorrect apostrophes into plurals, not possessives or contractions; at least one has imposed a US spelling on an article on a British subject; etc etc... Please stop trying to "correct" spellings, because your attempts to do so are doing more harm than good. JBW (talk) 23:18, 30 January 2024 (UTC)


 * idk how to edit rly, thats just the easies way, can you give me advice? ILuvMad (talk) 15:51, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Many of your edits have been reverted for introducing errors. Only suggestion I have now is to take care before making any edits, to learn what you're doing wrong by reading the edit summaries of your reversed edits, and try to improve. For example, one of your common mistakes is to use something like 1990's, which is the possessive, rather than the correct form, 1990s. Greenman (talk) 06:14, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi ILuvMad! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages

-- 17:19, Wednesday, January 31, 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:ILuvMad


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:ILuvMad requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.  Waqar 💬 18:36, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Spelling and punctuation changes
Wikipedia does not give preference to any national variety of English over others. In some cases there is a good reason for using one national variety; for example in the article Winston Churchill it makes sense to use British English, while in the article San Fransisco it makes sense to use US English. However, when there is no such specific reason for preferring one version, it is not acceptable to change content of an article to comply with one's own preferences. In the article Glenbrook Vintage Railway, which is on a New Zealand topic, your change from "Labour" to "Labor" was not correcting a spelling mistake; it was replacing the spelling which is normal in New Zealand (and most other English speaking countries) with a spelling largely restricted to North America. That is not the only time that you have done that kind of thing. If you aren't sure about things like that then it will be better for you not to try to correct spellings. Also, don't make changes such as replacing 80s with 80's. An apostrophe should be used to indicate a possessive form of a noun or to indicate a contraction, not to indicate a plural.

Adding links to articles
I see that some of your edits have added links from one article to another, known as "wikilinks". Wikilinks can be very helpful, but it is a very common mistake among new editors to add too many wikilinks to articles. Generally speaking, a wikilink should be added only if it provides information which is likely to help readers of the article in which the link is placed to understand content of that article, or provide further information closely connected to content of that article. That normally means either a link to an article which explains words or expressions in the article containing the link, or a link to an article which provides background information which is necessary in order to understand content of the article containing the link. Linking to articles in other situations is not just unnecessary, it can actually be harmful, because research has established that the more irrelevant, or only slightly relevant, links there are in a page, the less likely readers are to find the ones which they might find useful. Thus, for example, nobody reading the article The Real World: Sydney is likely to need to consult the article Australia in order to understand what "Australia" means, nor does the article Australia contain any information about The Real World: Sydney, so linking the one to the other is not likely to be helpful. JBW (talk) 19:25, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

After receiving my messages above you have continued to add unnecessary links to common words into articles, to add additional copies of links which are already present in the articles in question, and to change words to US spellings, without any evident justification, and without giving any explanation. Many new editors make mistakes such as those because they don't realise they are mistakes, but continuing to do the same things after being warned about them is a different matter. Please take these warnings seriously; if you don't, then you are likely to be blocked from editing by an administrator. JBW (talk) 22:30, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

February 2024
Hello, I'm My Pants Metal. An edit that you recently made to Wikipedia seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! My Pants Metal (talk) 20:51, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

 You have been blocked temporarily from editing for continuing with the same kinds of unconstructive editing that you have been warned about, in some cases warned more than once. Please read the messages above, and when the block is over make sure you take heed of those messages. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. JBW (talk) 23:06, 6 February 2024 (UTC)


 * i will try to do better and make good edits, can you give me another chance? ILuvMad (talk) 16:14, 7 February 2024 (UTC)