User talk:IM.SO.ANGSTY

Speedy deletion of Lit. Mag
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Lit. Mag, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 17:27, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Lit. Mag
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Lit. Mag, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 17:34, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

March 2008
Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia you will be blocked from editing. Mister Senseless&trade; (Speak - Contributions) 17:34, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you create an inappropriate page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 17:35, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Hi Angsty

Thanks for deciding to contribute to Wikipedia. However you should be aware that just because something exists that does not mean it deserves a Wikipedia article. Wikipedia is not the place for all the information in the world.

Your Lit. Mag. does not appear to be notable, since it is a school magazine (just one of many thens of thousands). See Notability for how we decide whether something deserves an article or not. If there is a reason why your magazine is more significant than others you should say so as soon as possible on the talk page, before the article is deleted.

Even if the article is deleted, don't let that stop you from creating other articles about important subjects. DJ Clayworth (talk) 17:37, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you use Wikipedia for advertising, you will be blocked from editing.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 17:40, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 17:40, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 17:41, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam);
 * and you must always:
 * 1) avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Conflict of Interest.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 17:42, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Everyone is giving you good advice, here's some more: Articles have to be about something notable, that is, of general interest. Click on Notability for an explanation of what that means. Also, they must give independently verifiable sources. Articles that don't meet these requirements are likely to be deleted. If you want to learn about making useful contributions, read the Introduction and the Guide to creating your first article. JohnCD (talk) 17:43, 11 March 2008 (UTC)