User talk:INDICATOR2018

February 2018
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Citobun (talk) 11:26, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

March 2018
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you purposefully and blatantly harass a fellow Wikipedian, as you did at User talk:O1lI0.
 * I don't have any responsibility to handle your complaint. What I see is you are editing and using multiple IPs.
 * This link records the fact that you were harassing me.

--O1lI0 (talk) 13:16, 8 March 2018 (UTC) . My posts, however, are definitely not "the same". And how do you think of your blatant personal attack on me through this edit. (A bad guy with many IPs.)--INDICATOR2018 (talk) 13:39, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Firstly, you harassed me first by posting GROUNDLESS warnings in my talk page. And my post in your talk page is merely a NOTICE rather than the so-called "harassment". Your posts, however, are arguably harassment. Again, NO DOUBLE STANDARDS! --INDICATOR2018 (talk) 13:19, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Clearly you have misinterpreted JamesBWatson's words. What he (possibly) said was "Please don't repeatedly post the same message to a user talk page"
 * I think using multiple accounts to edit war is a bad thing, doing bad things is a bad guy is normal logic. Or you do not use multiple accounts/ edit war?--O1lI0 (talk) 13:46, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Whatever you say cannot change the fact that you have attacked me. --INDICATOR2018 (talk) 13:48, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

March 2018
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Citobun (talk) 13:15, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Block notice
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing of various kinds, including: edit-warring on a number of pages, continuing to do so even after you yourself had posted an edit-warring warning to another editor's talk page, indicating that you are well aware of the policy; a belligerent attitude to editors with whom you disagree; editing to promote a point of view (by adding content supporting that point of view, changing existing content, and removing content unfavourable to that point of view). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 14:26, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Question
James, I know I have engaged in editing wars and should be thus blocked. Yet I would like to know how my edits are "disruptive". As you can see, Citobun's accusations against are are either content disputes or simply unreasonable. --INDICATOR2018 (talk) 14:32, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Content dispute? The argument is that you're WP:NOWHERE, not that your content is bad by itself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.156.233.252 (talk) 09:44, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Arbitrarily making false accusations against me is not a sign that you have abided by WP:CIVIL. --INDICATOR2018 (talk) 12:45, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
 * P.S. There is no such thing as WP:NOWHERE. --INDICATOR2018 (talk) 12:46, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
 * It was a typo. How is that "arbitrarily making false accusations against you"? I just summarized the ANI discussion, or at least my takeaway. What did I do?

Honestly, I'm seeing a lot of this - you accusing people of violating WP:CIVIL or otherwise being unkind to you whatever their offense was, even if it was listing diffs or warning you for violating 3RR. I'd suggest setting your accusation to the offense, or maybe cooling off your editing habits a little. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.156.233.252 (talk) 13:00, 9 March 2018 (UTC)