User talk:INTLAB

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [ Articles for creation help desk], or on the [ . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! RadioFan (talk) 17:30, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

status advice
As reviewing administrator, who often works on academic subjects here, I need to apologize for the   prior reviewing by a editor who do not realize that being the editor in chief of a major journal   is pretty much a guarantee of notability. But I must alert you that it is possible that they will nonetheless challenge the article--there is no way of preventing it. The best way of defending it is to add 3rd party references for the awards, and to indicate the number of citations of the most cited papers. Please see WP:PROF for the relevant standards.

However, there is a more serious problem. A Wikipedia article may not be copied   from a web site, even the subject's own -  it's a copyright violation, although  if you own the copyright and are willing to give us permission according to WP:DCM (permission that irrevocably gives everyone in the world the right to copy, reuse, and modify the material),  it is easier to rewrite. and rewriting will be needed in any case. The existing AfC was a complete copyvio from the web site, and as an administrator, I had to delete it. Be aware you will need to rewrite the articles to Wikipedia style; a good place to start learning it  is    our guide to writing Wikipedia articles.

First, give the basic information--the source should be the CV-- birthplace and date, degrees, previous positions. If there are published books, list them in formal bibliographic style. In a field dependent on journal articles, list the 3 or 4 most influential articles, getting citation figures from Scopus or Web of Science or Google Scholar, or some other appropriate source.. Do not include conference presentations, book chapters, and other minor published work.

Include major national level offices and awards, but not minor ones. Be sure to list editorships (but not mere editorial board membership) --we consider it very important, and you should add it to the articles for the relevant journals also, with a link to the bio. Include the society fellowship, but not ordinary memberships.

If the person has any notable students who would qualify for Wikipedia bios, include them. The person's PhD & postdoctoral advisors probably also qualify for bios here; add them and link them, even if they do not yet have articles.

It is not necessary to cite the basic information in detail to other than the official CV. However, give any actual references providing substantial coverage from 3rd party independent published reliable sources, print or online, but not blogs or press releases, or material derived from press releases. For any part you quote directly from a published bio, include quotation marks and a reference.

Pay particular attention to the way we make links to other Wikipedia articles. Avoid WP:Peacock terms: do not use words of praise, or state that the person is important: the contents of the article will show it.

Include only material that would be of interest to a general reader coming across the mention of the subject and wanting the sort of information that would be found in an encyclopedia. Do not include material that would be of interest only to those associated with the subject, or to prospective students--that sort of content is considered promotional. Keep in mind that the goal of an encyclopedia is to say things in a concise manner, which is not the style of  press releases or  web sites, or CVs,  which are usually more expansive. If you need any assistance, please ask me directly on  ''' my user talk page.   DGG''' ( talk ) 18:09, 3 August 2013 (UTC)