User talk:IO1Magus

Speedy deletion nomination of The IO1
Hello IO1Magus,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged The IO1 for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. For more details please see the notice on the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:The_IO1&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Natureium (talk) 22:10, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

April 2018
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but it appears you have written or added to an article about yourself. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to an existing article about yourself, please propose the changes on its talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was my page deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Natureium (talk) 22:19, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

Undisclosed paid editing
Hello IO1Magus. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to The IO1, and that you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:IO1Magus. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 22:38, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

No sharing
The comments on Talk:The IO1 suggest that more than one person is using this account. One comment written by this account stated, in the first person, "I am an artist and this page was created to allow my fans to see more information about me." Another comment from an anonymous editor said, "tHIS PAGE IS NOT SELF PROMOTION AND WAS CREATED BY MY MANAGER". So which is it? Did the artist create the page or did his manager?

Wikipedia's username policy states that accounts can only be used by one person, the same person, for the account's entire lifetime. Accounts can never be shared, and any evidence of shared use can be used as grounds for the account to be blocked. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 22:42, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The IO1


The article The IO1 has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 00:47, 11 April 2018 (UTC)