User talk:IP0W3RSH3LLi

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello IP0W3RSH3LLi, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Stephen S. Mulkey have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Copyrights. You may also want to review Copy-paste.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Translation. See also Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:50, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion
Hi IP0W3RSH3LLi: Welcome to Wikipedia. I'm sure that what you did was not intentional, but you nominated my new page creation for speedy deletion based on WP:BLPPROD. If you read the standard, this can apply to a biography of a living person which has no citations to reliable sources. The article I created, John M. Allen (soldier), is a biography for a person who died in 1847. The article cited a reliable source. I can also see that you are using the Twinkle gadget to nominate several other articles for speedy deletion. Though unintentional, nominating articles for speedy deletion without attempting to understand the underlying policies is disruptive. I am notifying an administrator. In the meantime, please use the WP:Teahouse for questions about editing. Thank you, Oldsanfelipe (talk) 00:37, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
 * I don't think adminstrative actions are active, I misunderstood that the subject as not alive and not subject to BLP, I apologise and my editd is reverted, isn't that enough? Thanks. --IP0W3RSH3LLi (talk) 09:16, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi IP0W3RSH3LLi: Thank you for understanding why I reverted your edit. No, I do not think that's enough. First, you have made a handful of nominations for speedy deletion which indicate that you don't understand the policies. Second, the Twinkle documentation includes the following warning, "Note: Never forget that you take full responsibility for any action performed using Twinkle. You must understand Wikipedia policies and use this tool within these policies, or risk being blocked." I reproduced the original formatting of the statement, so the bold is in the original text. Twinkle for a new editor is like handing over the keys of a sports car to a new driver. At this point, you would help yourself by disabling Twinkle and learning the core content policies, for example. There are tools for new editors, such as your sandbox and WP:Teahouse. In general, Wikipedia is very forgiving of mistakes, especially regarding new editors. You can learn how to edit incrementally. On the other hand, the use of Twinkle assumes that you understand the guidelines and policies. Please let me know if you have any questions. Oldsanfelipe (talk) 11:31, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Janell Carroll


Hello, IP0W3RSH3LLi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Janell Carroll".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. DannyS712 (talk) 09:18, 1 March 2019 (UTC)