User talk:IQual/Archive 2

File source problem with File:Mfk topolcany.png
Thank you for uploading File:Mfk topolcany.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:03, 26 February 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 10:03, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Fk poprad.png
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Fk poprad.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 10:04, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Fk poprad.png
Thank you for uploading File:Fk poprad.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:04, 26 February 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 10:04, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Lokomotiva zvolen.png
Thank you for uploading File:Lokomotiva zvolen.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:05, 26 February 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 10:05, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Lokomotiva zvolen.png
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Lokomotiva zvolen.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 10:05, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Sokol dolnazdana.png
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sokol dolnazdana.png, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Eeekster (talk) 10:06, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Fk spisskanovaves.png
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Fk spisskanovaves.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 10:07, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Fk spisskanovaves.png
Thank you for uploading File:Fk spisskanovaves.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:07, 26 February 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 10:07, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Banik ruzina.png
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Banik ruzina.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 10:07, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Banik ruzina.png
Thank you for uploading File:Banik ruzina.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:08, 26 February 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 10:08, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Andrej Brčák


The article Andrej Brčák has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Crusio (talk) 22:59, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ján Varga


The article Ján Varga has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Footballer who is yet to have made a fully professional appearance, thus failing WP:FOOTYN.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jared Preston (talk) 21:15, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Artūrs Zjuzins


A tag has been placed on Artūrs Zjuzins, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  Cind. amuse  18:13, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

March 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Artūrs Zjuzins, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you.  Cind. amuse  20:38, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Martin Mravec


The article Martin Mravec has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Does not meet notability criteria. Has never played for a fully professional club.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stu.W UK (talk) 01:50, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Michal Faško


The article Michal Faško has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Does not appear to meet either WP:NSPORTS or (more importantly) WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —WFC— 15:56, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Ján Varga for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ján Varga is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ján Varga until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jared Preston (talk) 20:07, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Artūrs Zjuzins


A tag has been placed on Artūrs Zjuzins, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  Cind. amuse  21:28, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

Your Pages
Some of your pages you have made are not notable. Please make them otherwise it is likly to be deleted. As you see I have put a template on your pages which are not. I will not delete them though. Someone will if you don't put more info into your pages. Wilbysuffolk (talk) 09:56, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Fk vysoke tatry.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Fk vysoke tatry.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. We hope (talk) 19:36, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Fk nizny hrusov.png


A tag has been placed on File:Fk nizny hrusov.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ww2censor (talk) 05:19, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Fk vysoke tatry.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Fk vysoke tatry.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 05:08, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Roland Szabó


The article Roland Szabó has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG, and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:11, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

PROD Protocols
When contesting the proposed deletion of an article, as you did with Roland Szabó, please explain your reason for doing so in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:57, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Please use the move button...
...when moving articles to new titles in order to keep the editing history of the page. Copy&paste moves like you did on 2011–12 Slovak Superliga and potentially more articles are discouraged. Please read WP:MOVE for more information, especially section 10 on how to fix these copy&paste moves. Thank you. --Soccer-holicI hear voices in my head... 11:34, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
 * One more thing – names like "I. liga" are potentially too ambiguous; for example, the Polish or Romanian leagues follow a similar naming scheme. I would hence propose to add a "Slovak" to the title, i.e. "Slovak I. liga". --Soccer-holicI hear voices in my head... 11:38, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Fk topolany.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Fk topolany.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 04:28, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Corgon liga.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Corgon liga.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 04:56, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Kit body astrencin 11-12 home.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Kit body astrencin 11-12 home.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 04:50, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jakub Hronec


The article Jakub Hronec has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Not yet notable per WP:NFOOTY, as he has not yet played in a professional match.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gurt Posh (talk) 10:28, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Emil Le Giang


The article Emil Le Giang has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Article about footballer who hasn't played in a fully-pro league and which fails the general notability guideline.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jogurney (talk) 23:56, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Pavol Cicman for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pavol Cicman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Pavol Cicman until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. FiachraByrne (talk) 13:41, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Daniel Jurč for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Daniel Jurč is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Daniel Jurč until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. FiachraByrne (talk) 14:59, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Jakub Hronec for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jakub Hronec is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jakub Hronec until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Gurt Posh (talk) 04:20, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

Emil Le Giang AfD
Please do not remove the AfD template at the top of the article page - it is considered vandalism. If you want to comment on the AfD please follow the link to the discussion page and post your comments there. Best regards. Jogurney (talk) 14:17, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

Creating kit
Hi, I think this explains it: Template:Football kit.

I haven't created one in a long time, so I can't help you with details.

Geregen2 (talk) 07:48, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

new kit
hello .. i cant create a full kit but this may help you

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Football_kit

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Football_kit_body — Preceding unsigned comment added by AhMeD BoSS (talk • contribs) 11:37, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

OK thank you. But I have a question for you, I would like to produce original jersey example http://svetdresov.files.wordpress.com/2010/10/presov_papaj.jpg or http://svetdresov.files.wordpress.com/2010/10/presov_biely_foto.jpg How do I do? templates according to football?

Peter Katona
I didn't do the original edit that changed the ethnicity. --User:Woohookitty Disamming fool! 10:47, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kevin Zonzon


The article Kevin Zonzon has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Article about footballer who has only played in Slovakia's (not fully-pro) second level and which fails the general notability guideline.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jogurney (talk) 21:30, 29 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Hello. According to WP:NFOOTBALL, a player needs to play in a fully-pro league (not simply for a professional club) in order to be assumed to meet the notability guideline. If you can add references to the article which show substantial coverage of the player in reliable sources, it can also satisfy WP:GNG. Best regards. Jogurney (talk) 22:15, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Matej Vozár


The article Matej Vozár has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Article about footballer who hasn't played and which fails the general notability guideline.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jogurney (talk) 03:58, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Matej Rakovan


The article Matej Rakovan has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Article about footballer who has only played in the (not fully-pro) second level of Slovakia and which fails the general notability guideline.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jogurney (talk) 04:01, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

Matej Rakovan
Rakovan was included as reserve goalkeeper at MŠK Žilina. Then he went on loan to MFK Tatran Liptovský Mikuláš. Rakovan is a member of the Slovakia U-21 team. I do not know what you mean by the word professional league, but Slovakia is a professional league mate. think that when it is automatically species level is inadequate? Rakovan and Zoznon have a professional contract as football players are paid their job as a higher level! AS Trenčín should also be considered for not fully-league club but when it advanced to the Slovak Superliga be it ok? Regards


 * Hello. If these people have appearance in Slovak Superliga matches, they would pass the NFOOTBALL notability guideline. However, there have not yet played at that level and the only way they would satisfy the notability requirement is if there are multiple reliable sources (such as Slovak-language newspapers or magazines) that have dedicated significant coverage of these athletes. So far, the articles just present references where the person's name is briefly mentioned (signing a contract or going on loan) and there is no indication that they have done anything notable or significant. Jogurney (talk) 13:06, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Tomáš Opiela


A tag has been placed on Tomáš Opiela requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Pesky ( talk  …stalk!) 12:34, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

Football Kit
This template may be the thing you are looking for Template:Football kit --Guerillero &#124; My Talk  17:28, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ousmane Samba


The article Ousmane Samba has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Article about footballer who has only played in the (not fully-pro) second level of Slovakia and which fails the general notability guideline.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jogurney (talk) 03:33, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Kit body whiteVman.png
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Kit body whiteVman.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Hammersoft (talk) 17:05, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Vladimír Andraščík


The article Vladimír Andraščík has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Article about footballer who hasn't played in a fully-pro league and which fails the general notability guideline.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jogurney (talk) 02:58, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dominik Kunca


The article Dominik Kunca has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Article fails our notability guidelines for football players.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jogurney (talk) 15:53, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nenad Živanović


The article Nenad Živanović has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:52, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Martin Gejdoš


The article Martin Gejdoš has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable footballer. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Argyle 4 Life talk  19:02, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

How to create own kit for my favourite fotball team ?
Hi, to create own kits for wikipedia:

1 - you have to get good pictures or drawings of the kits, e.g. http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6209/6147672554_8d10243360_z.jpg or http://img600.imageshack.us/img600/1543/200708barcelonah.png. 2 - create basic templates in photoshop or paint^^. watch the correct dimensions of the parts (body, left arm etc.). 3 - fill the created template with colour. it is better not to create logos or wordmarks because of copyright rules. 4 - upload the kits

I hope this discription helps you. Greetings Luxusfrosch (talk) 12:00, 20 September 2011 (UTC)