User talk:IRRAD

Speedy deletion nomination of User:IRRAD


A tag has been placed on User:IRRAD, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising,. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the |the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Mean as custard (talk) 12:27, 10 June 2011 (UTC) Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because it appears to be mainly intended or used for publicity and/or promotional purposes. Please read the following carefully.

Why can't I edit Wikipedia?

Your account's edits and/or username indicate that it is being used on behalf of a company, group, celebrity or other well-known individual, or organization for purposes of promotion and/or publicity. The edits may have violated one or more of our rules on spamming, which include: adding inappropriate external links, posting advertisements, and using Wikipedia for promotion. Wikipedia has many articles on companies, groups, and organizations, but such groups are generally discouraged from using Wikipedia to write about themselves. In addition, usernames like yours are disallowed under our username policy.

Probably not. See WP:FAQ/Organizations for a helpful list of frequently asked questions by people in your position. Also, review the conflict of interest guidance to see the kinds of limitations you would have to obey if you did want to continue editing about your company, group, or organization. If this does not fit in with your goals, then you will not be allowed to edit again. Consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead.
 * Am I allowed to make these edits if I change my username?

You are still welcome to write about something other than your company or organization. If you do intend to make useful contributions on some other topic, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following:
 * What can I do now?


 * Add the text on your user talk page.
 * Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:Listusers to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy.
 * Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, please see how to appeal a block.  At am a  頭 21:13, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

This page should not be speedy deleted because...
This page should not be speedy deleted because IRRAD as a user didn't intend to use wikipedia for promotional purposes but to share our experiences working for rural villages with the global fraternity. The idea of sharing the work came from the following main reasons:
 * 1) Many a times we need to refer internet for content relating to Integrated Sustainable village development methodology, Mewat- a backward district in rural haryana, approaches to rural development etc.; however there has not been much help available.
 * 2) Through this article we intended to share our learnings with the interest groups so that our contributions may help others.

We began writing the article after referring many other NGO articles. This was the first time we were contributing to wikipedia and we did try to adhere to the wikipedia editorial guidelines, however we have now realised that we missed out checking some important points from the vast pool of guidelines. We started our posting using the sandbox as advised. Since the content in the sandbox remains only for 12 hours, we practised the way of writing aricles there and straightaway went to the main user page to write the first draft. We missed the opportunity to improve the article to suit the enriching encyclopedic content on the website as we had pressed 'save page'.

We understand that the article submitted by us violated the G11 category of criteria for speedy deletion as per wikipedia. As a follow up we agree to fundamentally restructure the article. We propose to undertake the following improvements to the article:
 * 1) To make the content neutral
 * 2) Make it more focused to rural development in India and not the implementing agency
 * 3) To highlight the problems of the district Mewat, where it lacks and few possible solutions to address those challenges
 * 4) Add more independent references
 * 5) Contribute to the community portal on rural development.

We would request you to kindly unblock our user page to enable us to contribute to wikipedia. --IRRAD (talk) 08:08, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

This page should not be speedy deleted because...
This page should not be speedy deleted because... --IRRAD (talk) 05:05, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

{{unblock-spamun|Insti IRRAD as a user didn't intend to use wikipedia for promotional purposes but to share our experiences working for rural villages with the global fraternity. The idea of sharing the work came from the following main reasons: Many a times we need to refer internet for content relating to Integrated Sustainable village development methodology, Mewat- a backward district in rural haryana, approaches to rural development etc.; however there has not been much help available. Through this article we intended to share our learnings with the interest groups so that our contributions may help others. We began writing the article after referring many other NGO articles. This was the first time we were contributing to wikipedia and we did try to adhere to the wikipedia editorial guidelines, however we have now realised that we missed out checking some important points from the vast pool of guidelines. We started our posting using the sandbox as advised. Since the content in the sandbox remains only for 12 hours, we practised the way of writing aricles there and straightaway went to the main user page to write the first draft. We missed the opportunity to improve the article to suit the enriching encyclopedic content on the website as we had pressed 'save page'. We understand that the article submitted by us violated the G11 category of criteria for speedy deletion as per wikipedia. As a follow up we agree to fundamentally restructure the article. We propose to undertake the following improvements to the article: To make the content neutral Make it more focused to rural development in India and not the implementing agency To highlight the problems of the district Mewat, where it lacks and few possible solutions to address those challenges Add more independent references Contribute to the community portal on rural development.