User talk:ISD/Archive 6

Do you want to be listed as an admin prospect?
Your name has been proposed as a prospect for adminship at Requests for adminship/Vetting, which means that people may provide some feedback for you. It appears the proposer forgot to leave a note here for you. For the moment, I therefore commented your entry out. If you do want to be in that list, please feel free to put your entry back. &mdash; Sebastian 01:13, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

Nominated for admin candidacy
 Cirt would like to nominate you to become an administrator. Please visit Requests for adminship to see what this process entails, and then [ contact Cirt] to accept or decline the nomination. A page for your nomination at Requests for adminship/ISD . If you accept the nomination, you must state and sign your acceptance. You may also choose to make a statement and/or answer the optional questions to supplement the information your nominator has given. Once you are satisfied with the page, you may post your nomination for discussion, or request that your nominator do so. Cirt (talk) 17:59, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Please indicate your acceptance at Requests for adminship/ISD, just below where it says: Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: Cirt (talk) 18:18, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
 * You should also answer Questions for the candidate, at the nomination subpage. Cirt (talk) 18:24, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

Good luck! Cirt (talk) 19:01, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
 * There are more questions now for you to answer, at the RfA subpage. Cirt (talk) 20:30, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

Bigipedia GAN
I apologize, but apparently there was a typo. Here I signed up to review an article, but somehow, I was signed up to review Bigipedia. Unfortunately, I don't think I could review the article fully (though its quite funny, I've listened to it) and removed the signup. Sorry if you're confused too, I'm going to post at GAN.  ceran  thor 00:17, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/ISD
Your RfA is, at present, unlikely to pass. The best move would probably be to withdraw it. Don't worry though, there is always admin coaching, and one failed RfA with a comeback RfA that sails through 3 or so months later is fairly common. Irbisgreif (talk) 14:40, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
 * I was also just about to suggest withdrawing. There are already a lot of constructive comments there so you can have an idea what areas to improve in the future, and leaving it open is likely to just subject you to a lot of discouraging scrutiny...it might be better for your own spirits to just withdraw. r ʨ anaɢ talk/contribs 14:45, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
 * I also would suggest withdrawing. I'd also like to suggest that you consider making a subpage for your userboxes, as that way you'll be able to have a cleaner userpage. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 15:12, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

ISD: You can follow the steps at Guide_to_requests_for_adminship if you wish to close the RfA yourself. If that is confusing - just post here at your talk page that you wish to withdraw the candidacy, and I can then cite your comment and go ahead and close the RfA if you wish. Cirt (talk) 17:00, 30 September 2009 (UTC)


 * ISD, I've gone ahead and closed it, per Cirt's comment here. If for some weird reason this was not what you wanted to do, please feel free to revert and trout me. I'm sorry it didn't work out; that looked a bit brutal.  Thanks for offering to help, and I hope to see you around. --Floquenbeam (talk) 20:13, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorry it went the way it did, I'd be happy to advise you in the future and learn from the constructive criticism given at the RfA. Cirt (talk) 20:46, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Grandville (comics)
Hello! Your submission of Grandville (comics) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! r ʨ anaɢ talk/contribs 21:54, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Kwame Nkrumah-Acheampong
Hello! Your submission of Kwame Nkrumah-Acheampong at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! ≈ Chamal talk ¤ 06:44, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Thomas K. Dye
I have nominated Thomas K. Dye, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Thomas K. Dye. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. The Wordsmith Communicate 07:20, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:File:Press Badge Blues.jpg)
 Thanks for uploading File:File:Press Badge Blues.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. The Wordsmith Communicate 19:06, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:File:Tonight's Top Story.jpg)
 Thanks for uploading File:File:Tonight's Top Story.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. The Wordsmith Communicate 19:08, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:File:We All Came Out to Mantra.jpg)
 Thanks for uploading File:File:We All Came Out to Mantra.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. The Wordsmith Communicate 19:10, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:File:Regime Change.jpg)
 Thanks for uploading File:File:Regime Change.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. The Wordsmith Communicate 19:13, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Lee Todd (amateur footballer)
I have nominated Lee Todd (amateur footballer), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Lee Todd (amateur footballer). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Brilliantine (talk) 00:37, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Did You Know question
Hello! Your submission of The QI Book of the Dead at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! (Note: I always leave approvals to others.) Art LaPella (talk) 02:26, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Merge discussion
I closed Articles for deletion/Thomas K. Dye as merge. User:Barberio disputed this close and opened a deletion review, which was closed as the admin argued that merge closes are not considered at DRV. I merged the material to Newshounds and redirected the article; Barberio has reverted the redirect, though the material remains merged. A discussion on the merge is at Talk:Newshounds; your participation would be welcome. Fences &amp;  Windows  01:38, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

2010 WikiCup Signups Reconfirmation!
To ensure that everyone who signed up is still committed to participating in the 2010 WikiCup, it is required that you remove your name from this list! By removing your name, you are not removing yourself from the WikiCup. This is simply a way for the judges to take note of who has not yet reconfirmed their participation. If you have not removed your name from that list by December 30th, 2009 (by 23:59 (UTC)) then your name will be removed from the WikiCup.

It's worth noting the rules have changed, likely after you signed up. The changes made thus far are:
 * Mainspace and/or portal edits will not be awarded points at all.
 * Did you know? articles (which were worth 5 points last year) will now be worth 10 points.
 * Good articles (which were worth 30 points last year) will now be worth 40 points.
 * Valued pictures will be now awarded points, however the amount (5 or 10 points) is still being discussed.
 * Featured lists (which were worth 30 points last year) will now be worth 40 points.
 * Featured portals (which were worth 25 points last year) will now be worth 35 points.
 * Featured articles (which were worth 50 points last year) will now be worth 100 points.
 * Featured topics (which were worth 10 points per article last year) will now be worth 15 points per any article in the topic that you were a major contributor to.
 * Good topics (which were worth 5 points per article last year) will now be worth 10 points per any article in the topic that you were a major contributor to.
 * In the news will still be awarded points, however the amount (5 or 10 points) is still being discussed.

If you have any final concerns about the WikiCup's rules and regulations, please ask them now, before the Cup begins to avoid last minute problems. You may come to the WikiCup's talk page, or any of the judge's user talk pages. We're looking forwards to a great 2010 WikiCup! On behalf of the WikiCup judges,  iMatthew  talk   at 03:43, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Love Soup - DVD - Series 1.gif
 Thanks for uploading File:Love Soup - DVD - Series 1.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 07:21, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of East Hampton Hospital Trust
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is East Hampton Hospital Trust. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/East Hampton Hospital Trust. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:09, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:MTW Cast.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:MTW Cast.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 06:37, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

The 2010 WikiCup begins tomorrow!
Welcome to the biggest WikiCup Wikipedia has yet seen! Round one will take place over two months, and finish on February 26. There is only one pool, and the top 64 will progress. The competition will be tough, as more than half of the current competitors will not make it to round 2. Details about scoring have been finalized and are explained at WikiCup/Scoring. Please make sure you're familiar with the scoring rules, because any submissions made that violate these rules will be removed. Like always, the judges can be reached through the WikiCup talk pages, on their talk page, or over IRC with any issues concerning anything tied to the Cup. We will keep in contact with you via weekly newsletters; if you do not want to receive them, please remove yourself from the list here. Conversely, if a non-WikiCup participant wishes to receive the newsletters, they may add themselves to that list. Well, enough talk- get writing! Your submission's page is located here. Details on how to submit your content is located here, so be sure to check that out! Once content has been recognized, it can be added to your submissions page, from which our bot will update the main score table. Remember that only articles worked on and nominated during the competition are eligible for points. Have fun, and good luck! Garden, iMatthew, J Milburn, and The ed17 19:19, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

The Recall Man
I just started the article on this BBC radio drama, currently being repeated on BBC 7. Believe it or not, it's set in Middlesbrough! Since you've often edited articles I've worked on, I though you might appreciate the chance to contribute to this one. Djdaedalus (talk) 20:42, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

dyk hook question
Please see my concern about your dyk hook here. Thanks, — Mattisse (Talk) 23:34, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Demon Candy: Parallel


The article Demon Candy: Parallel has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Notability not established, as third-party reliable sources are absent. Unable to find other sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ucucha 21:42, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

WikiCup 2010 January newsletter
We are half way through round one of the WikiCup. We've had some shakeups regarding late entries, flag changes and early dropouts, but the competition is now established- there will be no more flag changes or new competitors. Congratulations to, our current leader, who, at the time of writing, has more listed points than and   (second and third place respectively) combined. A special well done also goes to - his artcle Jewel Box (St. Louis, Missouri) was the first content to score points in the competition.

Around half of competitors are yet to score. Please remember to submit content soon after it is promoted, so that the judges are able to review entries. 64 of the 149 current competitors will advance to round 2- if you currently have no points, do not worry, as over half of the current top 64 have under 50 points. Everyone needs to get their entries in now to guarantee their places in round 2! If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, by email or on IRC. Good luck! J Milburn, Garden, iMatthew and The ed17 Delivered by JCbot (talk) at 00:15, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

WikiCup 2010 February newsletter
Round one is over, and round two has begun! Congratulations to the 64 contestants who have made it through, but well done and thank you to all contestants who took part in our first round. A special well done goes to, our round one winner (1010 points), and to and , who were second and third respectively (640 points/605 points). Sasata was awarded the most points for both good articles (300 points) and featured articles (600 points), and TonyTheTiger was awarded the most for featured topics (225 points), while Hunter Kahn claimed the most for good topics (70). claimed the most featured lists (240 points) and featured pictures (35 points), claimed the most for Did you know? entries (490 points),  claimed the most for featured sounds (70 points) and  claimed the most for In the news entries (40 points). No one claimed a featured portal or valued picture.

Credits awarded after the end of round one but before round two may be claimed in round two, but remember the rule that content must have been worked on in some significant way during 2010 by you for you to claim points. The groups for round two will be placed up shortly, and the submissions' pages will be blanked. This round will continue until 28 April, when the top two users from each group, as well as 16 wildcards, will progress to round three. Please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup; thank you to all doing this last round, and particularly to those helping at WikiCup/Reviews. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, by email or on IRC. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn, Fox, iMatthew and The ed17 Delivered by JCbot (talk) at 00:47, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Sofawolf Press
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Sofawolf Press. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Sofawolf Press. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:09, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Ruth Belville
I was hoping someone would create that. Nice article by the way. :) TheRetroGuy (talk) 23:48, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

WikiCup 2010 March newsletter
We're half way through round two, and everything is running smoothly. leads overall with 650 points this round, and heads pool B. currently leads pool C, dubbed the "Group of Death", which has a only a single contestant yet to score this round (the fewest of any group), as well five contestants over 100 points (the most). With a month still to go, as well as 16 wildcard places, everything is still to play for. Anything you worry may not receive the necessary attention before the end of the round (such as outstanding GA or FA nominations) is welcome at WikiCup/Reviews, and please remember to continue offering reviews yourself where possible. As always, the judges are available to contact via email, IRC or their talk pages, and general discussion about the Cup is welcome on the WikiCup talk page.

Although unrelated to the WikiCup, April sees a Good Article Nominations backlog elimination drive, formulated as a friendly competition with small awards, as the Cup is. Several WikiCup contestants and judges have already signed up, but regular reviewers and those who hope to do more reviewing are more than welcome to join at the drive page. If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn, Fox, iMatthew and The ed17 Delivered by JCbot (talk) 22:16, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Bob Hope
I'd like to point out to you that WP:MOSBIO has clear guidelines about how to specify nationality in the lead sentence. It specifically states not to include terms like "British born", but only the citizenship that the subject held when they became famous. The place of birth should be noted in the infobox, which can be seen while reading the lead. Further details go in the "Early life" section. Now, if Hope held dual citizenship when he attained fame, then the lead should be changed to describe him as British-American, as Cary Grant is described. However, in general, those who moved and became citizens of a new country as a child as Hope did at five years old, are described only as a citizen of their adopted country, as their notability does not depend on their birth citizenship. Yworo (talk) 13:28, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Ozy and Millie
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Ozy and Millie. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Ozy and Millie. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:09, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

WikiCup 2010 April newsletter
Round two is over, and we are down to our final 32. For anyone interested in the final standings (though not arranged by group) this page has been compiled. Congratulations to, our clear overall round winner, and to and , who were solidly second and third respectively. There were a good number of high scorers this round- competition was certainly tough! Round three begins tomorrow, but anything promoted after the end of round two is eligible for points. 16 contestants (eight pool leaders and eight wildcards) will progress to round four in two months- things are really starting to get competitive. Anything you worry may not receive the necessary attention before the end of the round (such as outstanding GA or FA nominations) is welcome at WikiCup/Reviews, and please remember to continue offering reviews yourself where possible. As always, the judges are available to contact via email, IRC or their talk pages, and general discussion about the Cup is welcome on the WikiCup talk page.

Judge iMatthew has retired from Wikipedia, and we wish him the best. The competition has been ticking over well with minimal need for judge intervention, so thank you to everyone making that possible. A special thank you goes to participants and  for their help in preparing for round three. Good luck everyone! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn, Fox and The ed17 17:34, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Jack (webcomic)
You mean to tell me that it wins just because it got some cheapo award that's apparently doled out like free samples at Costco; it otherwise fails WP:N but let's keep it JUST FOR THE AWARD?!?! Get real. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 21:01, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Comedy in the Signpost
"WikiProject Report" would like to focus on WikiProject Comedy for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Also, if you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. -Mabeenot (talk) 22:16, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Hey, I added some answers, . Thanks very much for thinking of me and including me in this interview. What do you think? :) -- Cirt (talk) 15:36, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

Mark Steel's in Town
Nice article. I've given it a peer review, included presenting 20 more sources that you can use. Fences &amp;  Windows  18:01, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

WikiCup 2010 May newsletter
We are half way through round 3, with a little under a month to go. The current overall leader is, who has 570 points. He leads pool C. Pools A, B and D are led by, and  respectively. Anything you worry may not receive the necessary attention before the end of the round (such as outstanding GA or FA nominations) is welcome at WikiCup/Reviews, and please remember to continue offering reviews yourself where possible. As always, the judges are available to contact via email, IRC or their talk pages, and general discussion about the Cup is welcome on the WikiCup talk page.

Two of last year's final 8, and, have dropped out of the competition, saying they would rather their place went to someone who will have more time on their hands than them next round. On a related note, a special thank you goes to for his help behind the scenes once again. There is currently a problem with the poster, perhaps caused by the new skin- take a look at this discussion and see if you can help. The competition has continued to tick over well with minimal need for judge intervention, so thank you to everyone making that possible. Good luck to all! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn, Fox and The ed17 20:49, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Now That's What I Call Steampunk! Volume 1
Hello! Your submission of Now That's What I Call Steampunk! Volume 1 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!  Sp in ni ng  Spark  17:42, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Now That's What I Call Steampunk! Volume 1
 — Rlevse • Talk  • 00:02, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

Reviewer rights
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Karanacs (talk) 15:29, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

ITN for José Saramago
-- HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   20:29, 18 June 2010 (UTC)