User talk:ISIHossein1995

Welcome!
Hello, Hosseinissina, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Your first article
 * Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
 * Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
 * and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place  on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Randykitty (talk) 15:06, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

June 2023
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Materials (journal). While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Randykitty (talk) 17:10, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Materials (journal), you may be blocked from editing. Take it to the talk page. Randykitty (talk) 08:12, 11 June 2023 (UTC)


 * The deleted text is maliciously intended to undermine the mentioned magazine and lacks reliable sources. The provided reference is not a reliable source for this journal ISIHossein1995 (talk) 09:36, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Materials (journal). This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Felida97  (talk) 09:57, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.


 * I think the brought text is incorrect and I can't hesitate to correct it, it seems there is a malicious intend behind the the sentence you added. Please take more concern about the ethics in science. Thanks, I provided reliable references, please consider them rather than stuck to and copy paste a previously written text ISIHossein1995 (talk) 10:06, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for promotion or advertising, as you did at Materials (journal). Randykitty (talk) 10:03, 11 June 2023 (UTC)


 * I'd provided reliable references, You deleted it without any consideration, please consider them rather than stuck to and copy paste a previously written text ISIHossein1995 (talk) 10:09, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
 * If there are useful tidbits among the promotional stuff that you added, please post them here for review and if warranted, I'll add the to the article. Please stop removing info on the special issues sourced to the journal's own website and criticised by an impeccable source (THE). --Randykitty (talk) 10:17, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
 * (ec) I just went through your edits and dont see anything that is sourced to independent reliable sources. I do see promotional blabla (time to publication), sourced to the journal itself (note that the info on SCImago is provided by the publisher). --Randykitty (talk) 10:27, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
 * I have provided the "6 weeks from submit to publish" from web of science, the most reliable reference in this field, about the edit "expecting decision 13.9 days after submit" The website of journal is monitored by MDPI, and the data is machine-generated and averaged based on the actual data. Above all of this, why did you delete the quartile page? the scimagoJR is one of the most reliable indexes in this field? ISIHossein1995 (talk) 11:29, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
 * While Clarivate lists lots of stats, they don't list speed of processing (not surprisingly, because they have no access to that info). How these data is collected is irrelevant and MDPI is not an independent source for info about the journal's processing speed. As for SCImago, I already explained to you that this is routinely removed from journal articles. Among all metrics available for journals, none has as yet replaced the impact factor, which is the sole metric that we include in journal articles. See WP:JWG. --Randykitty (talk) 11:57, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Please take a look and criticize every sentence you think is incorrect, please also check the reliable sources, a web site you provided (that may be written by yourself) is not a reliable sourece and reference, The provided references by me, is the Web of science, Clarivate, and scimagojr as the most reliable scietific journal indexing and qualification websites. Please elaborate and stop from being in stubborn war against an scientific journal


 * 1/ Materials is a semi-monthly peer-reviewed open access scientific journal that focuses on materials science and engineering. 2/ It was established in 2008 and is currently published by MDPI. 3/ The editor-in-chief is Dr. Maryam Tabrizian from (McGill University). 4/ Materials publishes a wide range of scientific content including reviews, regular research papers, short communications, and book reviews. 5/ Additionally, the journal occasionally releases special issues on specific topics. 6/ Authors can anticipate receiving an initial decision regarding their manuscripts within an average of approximately 13.9 days after submission, based on the median values observed for papers published in the journal during the second half of 2022. 7/ The journal holds a 2021 impact factor of 3.748, a JCR-Q1 ranking in the field of Metallurgy & Metallurgical Engineering, a CiteScore-Q2 ranking in the field of Condensed Matter Physics. ISIHossein1995 (talk) 10:25, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

OK, For clarity, I have taken the liberty to change your text slightly by numbering the sentences, for ease of discussion. Here goes:1/ First phrase is essential identical. 2/ Idem second phrase. 3/ Third phrase: essentially the same, remove "Dr" as is usual. 4/ Fourth phrase: promotional bolding. Slightly promotional wording toned down by me. 5/ Fifth phrase: "occasional" is demonstrably wrong. The journal itself list 1800 special issues for 2022-2025. This practice has been criticized by Inside Higher Ed, an impeccable source. You keep deleting this sourced information. 6/ This phrase is purely promotional and based on information provided by the publisher. The reference to WoS does not say anything like this. SCImago just displays whatever info it got from MDPI. 7/ While we routinely display impact factors, we do not include any other stats, per longstanding consensus at the WikiProject Academic Journals. Hope this explains. --Randykitty (talk) 10:47, 11 June 2023 (UTC)


 * You say ScimagoJR take data from MDPI, ridiculous, all of we know scimago takes data from Scopus, web of science and clarivate, you can refer to their page,
 * You say WOS does not say "6 weeks from submitting to publication" please check the following link: https://mjl.clarivate.com/journal-profile ISIHossein1995 (talk) 11:45, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
 * I did not say that SCImago take their data from MDPI, but the blurp that you linked to is publisher-provided and not an acceptable source. The "journal profile" link just goes to the master journal list page and doesn't display anything about Materials. If you search for "Materials", yu find in which Clarivate databases this journal is included, nothing else. --Randykitty (talk) 12:02, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Materials (journal). Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Randykitty (talk) 10:53, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page:. PhilKnight (talk) 12:08, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Randykitty (talk) 10:57, 11 June 2023 (UTC)