User talk:ISUEngineerGuy

License tagging for Image:Formula Car.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Formula Car.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 04:05, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Adoption Request
Hi. I see you have requested adoption and I am seeking to adopt. Please take a look at my userpage and see if I am a good fit to be your mentor. If you agree to be adopted by me, then let me know on my talk page by clicking the "+" symbol at the top of the page and letting me know. If not, I would still be glad to answer any questions you have at any time. Welcome to Wikipedia! Also, your user page isn't the place for discussions. They should only occur on talk pages, like this one, or of the article in question. MECU ≈ talk 13:50, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Okay. Great. I can see we have lots to do. First, when you are editing talk pages, you must sign your comments by putting  which will turn into your username (linked to your userpage) and the time. Only do this on talk pages (such as this one, and my user talk page) but never articles. Second, when you edit a talk page and are starting a new subject, such as what you did to my talk page, you should create a new section header. It's fairly simple, just put the header (whatever you want to name it, related to your topic) with two equal signs on each side as the very first entry on it's own line. So, ==Adoption== would look like this:

Adoption
Third, you asked me what I thought about your article, but I don't know what article you are talking about. You should have wikilinked to the article to be more specific. (I know ways I can find what article you are talking about tho, but you should just link it). See WP:LINK for information on that. I've put a bunch of information above in the green box you should look at. Don't worry about trying to read it all or memorizing it, just get the general idea.

Lastly, I'm guessing you were referring to ISU Formula SAE? It appears that this is a college club (we had one a CU, but I wasn't in it) and that there isn't really information about your team in the media. If you had won a season, then I could see an article about it, but otherwise I don't see that it is WP:NOTABLE enough for Wikipedia. Campus papers wouldn't count in this case either. Try to find some sources about the team. I think a lot of that information would be better on the Formula SAE article instead though, so you could work on that article. I hope that's enough to get you started. Please feel free to contact me at anytime. I'm on IRC and have AIM if you prefer those methods as well. -- MECU ≈ talk 18:13, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
 * That sounds great and best of luck to you and your team. But Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. We don't have articles for things that will happen, or "when you win this year" and being small and student-run does make you different, but it's still not notable. We have to be able to attribute our information to reliable independent sources. Also, we are not for original research. Since you are also involved with this group, you should see conflict of interest policy as well. Lastly, there's no need to put your signature onto a new line, just put it at the end of your text like this: -- MECU ≈ talk 18:43, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Some of the language you used in my talk page was future tense, in justifying the notability of this article. You are right that you never said you were part of the team, but it was logical to assume as such with your username and the name of the article. I actually had checked out the references, 1 which is the team website which isn't reliable and the other three which are just for general Formula SAE information, and none of them refer to ISU in any capacity. -- MECU ≈ talk 19:05, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Request to participate in University of Washington survey on tool to quickly understand Wikipedians’ reputations
Hello. I'm part of a research group at the University of Washington. In April, we met with Wikipedians to learn what they would like to know about other editors’ history and activities (within Wikipedia) when interacting with them on talk pages. The goal was to gather feedback to help design a tool that could quickly communicate useful information about other Wikipedians. We have now created a few images that we feel represent some of what our participants thought was important. We would appreciate it if you took a few minutes of your time to complete an online survey that investigates whether or not these images would be useful to you. Your quick contribution would be very valuable to our research group and ultimately to Wikipedia. (When finished, the code for this application will be given over to the Wikipedia community to use and/or adjust as they see fit.)

We are particularly interested in feedback from new editors! We want to make sure this tool meets your needs.

Willing to spend a few minutes taking our survey? Click this link.

Please feel free to share the link with other Wikipedians. The more feedback, the better! The survey is completely anonymous and takes less than 10 minutes to complete. All data is used for university research purposes only.

Thank you for your time! If you have any questions about our research or research group, please visit our user page. Commprac01 (talk) 23:10, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Additional details about our research group are available here.