User talk:ITdynamIC

Welcome!
Hi ITdynamIC! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! --Srleffler (talk) 02:31, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

January 2023
Hello ITdynamIC. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:ITdynamIC. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. MrOllie (talk) 21:05, 26 January 2023 (UTC)


 * I have no equity interest in Novartis, nor do I work for the FDA, NIH, or the New York Times, the references. Please read the FDA press release to understand why this is worth highlighting.  Thanks ITdynamIC (talk) 15:39, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
 * That is splitting hairs that the relevant policy does not split. Are you associated in any way with Novartis? Or are you employed by an organization associated with them? MrOllie (talk) 15:52, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Answer is no to both questions. ITdynamIC (talk) 17:34, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

William Elvin Jackson
I just saw your email about William Elvin Jackson. I kept the reference you added. I just removed the sentence. The fact that Jackson summarized his work is not worth mentioning. If there is something useful to say about "simultaneous broadcast of radio range and telephone transmission to pilots in mid air" other than that Jackson wrote a summary of his work on that, we should say so. Was that one of his greatest achievements? Is that technology particularly notable among all the other things he developed, so that it is worth a special mention? We need some reason to talk about that topic other than that Jackson happened to write a summary of his work on it.-- Srleffler (talk) 19:48, 29 March 2024 (UTC)