User talk:ITeachThem

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Hatirjheel copyright problem
I have removed content you added to the above article, as it appears to have been copied from http://ourdhakacity.blogspot.ca/2014/01/new-attraction-of-dhaka-citywow.html, a copyright web page. All content you add to Wikipedia must be written in your own words. Please let me know if you have any questions or if you think I made a mistake. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 01:31, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
 * No, it wasn't, since I have written that myself! I wrote that a long time ago and contributed to Wikipedia, here's the evidence: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hatirjheel&diff=579713477&oldid=579713167 (check the date, 08:18, 1 November 2013). Someone then deleted that from Wikipedia, and I just reverted that recently. Now check the date of the blog you've mentioned: http://ourdhakacity.blogspot.ca/2014/01/new-attraction-of-dhaka-citywow.html (January 5, 2014). Now isn't it clear that the paragraph you claim was copied from that blog was actually copied from Wikipedia? I added some new things and corrected some grammatical issues in the latest version of that paragraph that I added. Now I'm incapable of reverting your action, or even see that! It would be really helpful if you can just do that for me. I think you should've consulted with me before taking such actions! Thank you! —ITeachThem (talk) 23:11, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I have now restored the content. Sorry for the mistake. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:19, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
 * It's okay and thank you so much for understanding! —ITeachThem (talk) 19:51, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Shob Choritro Kalponik for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shob Choritro Kalponik is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Shob Choritro Kalponik until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kirbanzo (talk) 09:40, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

"River Flows In You" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect River Flows In You. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 5 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Mistakefinder (talk) 07:45, 5 August 2021 (UTC)