User talk:IUSBProf

67.236.154.17 has removed earlier copies of this without justification. Judging from the contributions that 67.236.154.17 is making, they seem to be an IUSB administrator. In my view the removal of this content is censorship. The original contribution of this text is referenced to local media sources. If this text is to be removed again, please provide a credible explanation for doing so.

February 2009
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. DFS454 (talk) 15:42, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Conflict of interest
Please review our guidelines regarding conflicts of interest. If you indeed are a member of the faculty of IUSB, then it may be inappropriate for you to edit this article without a) discussing it first on the article's talk page and b) disclosing your affiliation with the school beforehand.

Furthermore, I have deleted the whole controversies section from the article. Quite frankly, Wikipedia is not a place to chronicle every minor controversy and scandal that hits a university and, in the big picture, things like grading controversies and the student press butting heads with the administration may seem important to IUSB right now, but they contain very, very little encyclopedic weight.

Let me know if you have any questions.  caknuck °  is a silly pudding  16:35, 7 February 2009 (UTC)


 * I have initiated further discussion of this matter at WP:ANI.  caknuck °  is a silly pudding  17:20, 7 February 2009 (UTC)