User talk:I (Dream,Plan & Achieve)

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because it appears to be mainly intended for publicity and/or promotional purposes. If you intend to edit constructively in other topic areas, you may be granted the right to continue under a change of username. Please read the following carefully.

Your account's edits and/or username indicate that it is being used on behalf of a company, group, website or organization for purposes of promotion and/or publicity. The edits may have violated one or more of our rules on spamming, which include: adding inappropriate external links, posting advertisements and using Wikipedia for promotion. Wikipedia has many articles on companies, groups, and organizations, but such groups are generally discouraged from using Wikipedia to write about themselves. In addition, usernames like yours are disallowed under our username policy.
 * Why can't I edit Wikipedia?

Probably not, although if you can demonstrate a pattern of future editing in strict accordance with our neutral point of view policy, you may be granted this right. See Wikipedia's FAQ for Organizations for a helpful list of frequently asked questions by people in your position. Also, review the conflict of interest guidance to see the kinds of limitations you would have to obey if you did want to continue editing about your company, group, organization, or clients. If this does not fit in with your goals, then you will not be allowed to edit Wikipedia again.
 * Am I allowed to make these edits if I change my username?


 * What can I do now?

If you have no interest in writing about some other topic than your organization, group, company, or product, you may consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead. If you do intend to make useful contributions here about some other topic, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following:


 * Add the text on your user talk page.
 * Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:Listusers to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy.
 * Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 08:32, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Possible sock account: User talk:IDIPIA

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 08:33, 15 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Are you related in any way to User talk:IDIPIA? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 13:12, 15 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Please note that we only discuss in private by email what must be kept private. I feel that you do have a conflict of interest - and probably another account here too User:Tripat Deep. You certainly know that user well enough to have edited their user page. By the way, I've undone your two changes to Maria Chudakova. 'Titleholder' is quite acceptable without either a space or a hyphen, and the comma you inserted was not needed. Peridon (talk) 17:52, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
 * And, of course, there's the User:IDIPIA account as well. I've blocked Tripat Deep as a sockpuppet of IDIPIA which I feel certain this account is too. Peridon (talk) 17:59, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
 * I've gone through the edits of 'Tripat Deep' and removed a lot more quite unnecessary tiny changes, of the same type as I mentioned above. Peridon (talk) 18:09, 15 April 2015 (UTC)


 * One more, for the record: User:Tripatdua. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 18:10, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
 * I think that might be the oldest (so far...). Peridon (talk) 18:16, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Peridon Now will you help me with the solution just undo delete the pages and do editing as per need and rest tell me i will do it my self and will try my level best not to repeat any kind of this mistakes in future. You are king enough to review and check the page so just edit and undo delete it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by I (Dream,Plan & Achieve) (talk • contribs) 04:42, 16 April 2015‎


 * 1) There is no question of restoring the deleted pages that you created, as they were blatant attempts to use Wikipedia for promotion, telling the world what a good thing your web site is, and what a wonderful person you are. That is not what Wikipedia is for, and there are no two ways about it.
 * 2) You created this account (and others) in order to evade a block on another account. If you are blocked, that means you are not allowed to edit Wikipedia: it does not mean that you are welcome to edit as long as you change to a different account.
 * 3) There is no question of unblocking you as long as it seems that your intention is to do the same kind of thing that led to your being blocked, namely writing to tell the word all about yourself and your work, how wonderful your web site is, and so on. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 09:53, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

I have just checked the editing history of your accounts, and I have found another good reason why you should not be unblocked. Apart from your promotional editing, almost all of your editing has consisted of replacing perfectly good English with English which is ungrammatical or wrongly punctuated. This wastes time for other editors who have to go round correcting your mistakes. You clearly do not have a good enough grasp of English to edit an English language encyclopaedia. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 10:15, 16 April 2015 (UTC)