User talk:I Love Bridges 2

Welcome!
Welcome to Wikipedia, I Love Bridges 2! Thank you for your contributions. I am WereSpielChequers and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Questions or type at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes ( ~ ); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!  Ϣere Spiel  Chequers  23:38, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Blocked
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for block evasion - (user:I Love Bridges). If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JohnCD (talk) 21:10, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Permanent Block?
It seems to me as if "blocked indefinately" is the same thing as "blocked permanently" because I cannot locate my block expiration date/time. Is this true? If not, what does this all mean? I Love Bridges 2 (talk) 20:03, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes, indefinitely= permanently= forever. Joseph2302 (talk) 20:05, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Technically, is incorrect: you are blocked until you present an unblock request which convinces a reviewing administrator that unblocking you would be a benefit to the encyclopedia. However, since you say "I did not post the notices on Lordville-Equinunk Bridge", but these diffs from the history: 1, 2, 3, 4 tell a different story, we evidently cannot believe a word you say, so you are unlikely to be unblocked any time soon. JohnCD (talk) 20:50, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

You didn't answer my other question!
I am still waiting for an answer to my other question that was in my unblock request, which was how come my deletion request per CSD g7 on John Greenleaf Whittier Bridge was declined, even though the IP number who tagged it was me forgetting to log in. I Love Bridges 2 (talk) 18:39, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
 * If you don't log in, how are we to be sure it is you? In any case, that question was answered four days ago on Talk:John Greenleaf Whittier Bridge, but to repeat: just above the "Save page" button you clicked to post the article, it says: "By clicking the "Save page" button... you irrevocably agree to release your contribution". While you can request deletion, you cannot demand it, and since some of the content was useful and verifiable, that is being kept. JohnCD (talk) 20:57, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

So-called hoax on John Greenleaf Whittier Bridge
I reread Talk:John Greenleaf Whittier Bridge, which reminded me to mention something else. The Replacement section that was removed is not by any means a hoax! In fact, last summer, I walked the nearby Chain Bridge and saw the replacement under construction form the water myself. In fact, I even remeber seeing Whittier Bridge Replacement signs posted along I-95. If you don't trust me, then you should go to Amesbury Massachusetts and see for yourself, but I'm telling you, this is factual. I Love Bridges 2 (talk) 00:50, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
 * What someone says they saw is not enough, whether that someone is you or me, because the Verifiability policy is that "any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source." See also No original research. JohnCD (talk) 17:30, 28 March 2015 (UTC)