User talk:I am Agent X

Welcome!
Hello, I am Agent X, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! lTopGunl (talk) 12:51, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

WP:PAK
Thanks man! Glad to join the Pakistani project. -- I am Agent   X  12:59, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Jinnah
This is quite serious. You have removed sourced information, and in doing so have explicitly supported another editor who 1) abandoned discussion, 2) has not bothered to look at the source, and 3) made unjustifiable "requrests" of other editors. Please explain. Gimmetoo (talk) 16:27, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Is mention of alcohol important? He asks for context. Nobody provided it. -- I am Agent   X  16:36, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
 * And you think the appropriate action is to not respond for 3 days, to not look at the source, and then to remove the material only because other editors have not done work for you? I don't consider that appropriate actions for an editor. Furthermore, both you and that editor have knowingly and consciously removed sourced material from an article without responding and without explanation on the talk page. Explain yourself. Gimmetoo (talk) 16:57, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I explained edit in summary. I have done it on talk page now. -- I am Agent   X  17:43, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
 * How can you state as a conclusion in your edit summary that it's "unimportant no context like Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington said"? If you don't know why it was significant (despite that being said in the discussion that ended 3 days ago), then the appropriate editorial decision is to look at the source and ask if you don't know, and not to remove sourced information out of ignorance. Again, if the issue was "context" (what the other "editor" said before removing the same sourced information), then the appropriate editorial response is to get the source, read it, and then either provide context or propose and discuss its removal. Gimmetoo (talk) 18:29, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Please support your source there. I will watch that page. -- I am Agent   X  12:55, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Attack page
Hello bro your name is on attack page list which blame you calling you sock. I have inform admin about it. you can comment too Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Darkness Shines/diffs --Highstakes00 (talk) 21:10, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for notifying man! Ridiculous. -- I am Agent   X  11:36, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/I am Agent X for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Darkness Shines (talk) 09:36, 31 May 2012 (UTC)